| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eat Me, Trolls wrote:
The way you troll him...you'd think he had ****ed your wife..AND daughter. It has been suggested that Reggie have a DNA match with his children. They're not really his, but his wife told him they were. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 27, 10:18*am, hkrause wrote:
Eat Me, Trolls wrote: The way you troll him...you'd think he had ****ed your wife..AND daughter. It has been suggested that Reggie have a DNA match with his children. They're not really his, but his wife told him they were. There are only two people here in rec.boats that would stoop so low as to say ****ty things about someone's family. You and JimH. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 28, 10:59*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote: wrote: On Feb 27, 10:18 am, hkrause wrote: Eat Me, Trolls wrote: The way you troll him...you'd think he had ****ed your wife..AND daughter. It has been suggested that Reggie have a DNA match with his children. They're not really his, but his wife told him they were. There are only two people here in rec.boats that would stoop so low as to say ****ty things about someone's family. You and JimH. I don't take anything said in rec.boats personally. *It didn't offend me, my wife or my children. Oh, I understand, but you have to admit, someone who would do that is the lowest form of pond scum there is. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 28, 1:50*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote: wrote: On Feb 28, 10:59 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: wrote: On Feb 27, 10:18 am, hkrause wrote: Eat Me, Trolls wrote: The way you troll him...you'd think he had ****ed your wife..AND daughter. It has been suggested that Reggie have a DNA match with his children. They're not really his, but his wife told him they were. There are only two people here in rec.boats that would stoop so low as to say ****ty things about someone's family. You and JimH. I don't take anything said in rec.boats personally. *It didn't offend me, my wife or my children. Oh, I understand, but you have to admit, someone who would do that is the lowest form of pond scum there is. What I have noticed is JimH loves to make fun of others family members, especially yours, then freaks out when someone doesn't make a personal wish of good luck to his son who has joined the marines. *That is another example of why you should not take rec.boats too seriously. I learned a long time ago, not to take anything said in rec.boats as anything more than bits and bites running through the internet. If you take it too seriously, you could end up like Harry living a fantasy life in rec.boats. *I loved his latest fantasy story about going to the "Del" so he could make a presentation on how to defeat the republicans, and he didn't realize that the Union his wife works for was having a convention at the exact same hotel. *I wonder why the hotel room was registered in his wife's name? * - Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - Right you are! And just like JimH, when he's outed, he disappears! I wonder why the hotel room was registered in his wife's name after he said that he went there with a partner, and that the room was in HIS name...... |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
BAR wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: A. I loved his latest fantasy story about going to the "Del" so he could make a presentation on how to defeat the republicans, B. and he didn't realize that the Union his wife works for was having a convention at the exact same hotel. C. I wonder why the hotel room was registered in his wife's name? ![]() D. Her union was paying for the trip. A. I made no such claim. This is yet another of Reggie's lies. I did attend a conference on that subject, though, and made a suggestion that got a few laughs. Neither the conference I attended nor my presentation had anything to do with a trade union. B. There was no convention. There was a meeting. That's all it was, as I told ReggieTurd, but of course he persists in spreading his bullsh*t, and then repeating it a zillion times. That's our boy, ReggieTurd. C. Because *she* made the reservation. D. No union paid for my trip. I find it humorous that "Reggie," the poster here with no actual life, no real name, no evidence of boat ownership, no evidence of a wife, no evidence of kids, no evidence of a job, gets his jollies sniffing up the butts of posters who do have actual lives, real names, real boats, real families, and real jobs. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
BAR wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: wrote: On Feb 28, 10:59 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: wrote: On Feb 27, 10:18 am, hkrause wrote: Eat Me, Trolls wrote: The way you troll him...you'd think he had ****ed your wife..AND daughter. It has been suggested that Reggie have a DNA match with his children. They're not really his, but his wife told him they were. There are only two people here in rec.boats that would stoop so low as to say ****ty things about someone's family. You and JimH. I don't take anything said in rec.boats personally. It didn't offend me, my wife or my children. Oh, I understand, but you have to admit, someone who would do that is the lowest form of pond scum there is. What I have noticed is JimH loves to make fun of others family members, especially yours, then freaks out when someone doesn't make a personal wish of good luck to his son who has joined the marines. That is another example of why you should not take rec.boats too seriously. You forgot to capitalize Marines ![]() I learned a long time ago, not to take anything said in rec.boats as anything more than bits and bites running through the internet. If you take it too seriously, you could end up like Harry living a fantasy life in rec.boats. I loved his latest fantasy story about going to the "Del" so he could make a presentation on how to defeat the republicans, and he didn't realize that the Union his wife works for was having a convention at the exact same hotel. I wonder why the hotel room was registered in his wife's name? ![]() Her union was paying for the trip. grin, it really is obvious isn't it. When I asked the front desk at the "del" what conventions they had going on, they told me the Bricklayers Union, I asked if K. G. (Harry's wife) was registered, which she was it became obvious that Harry was tagging along on his wife's meeting. When I told Harry that he wasn't registered, I was hoping I could get to come up with another lie, but he didn't bite. It was funny that he still pretended not to know the Bricklayers were having a convention at the same hotel he was conducting his "political presentation". |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Yo - Harry... | General | |||
| Hey Harry... | General | |||
| Hi Harry....... | General | |||
| New Harry Lie | General | |||