On Feb 26, 7:12*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:40:25 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:



http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=4344326&page=1

You know what I've noticed about images of Obama?

He has a set of jug ears - nothing wrong with that, but if you look at
images of him head on, they are photoshopped to flatten them out.

I first noticed this yesterday when I got my US News and World
magazine - I checked images in Time and Newsweek - they all need to
get the same photo editor because the differences in how they treat
his ears are markable. *:)

Another thing they do is thin out his nose - what that means, I don't
know - again, it's just something I noticed - nothing wrong with it -
happens all the time, but the problem is that different editors do it
in different ways.

You'd figure they would come up with a template and pass it around.

It will be intersting to watch the "debate" tonight - be the first one
I watched this season.

Kinda like the mid 70's the tabloid andGlam- mags wold try to give the
Farah Fawcett photos "cleavage" where there was none.

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:31:33 -0800, Tim wrote:


Kinda like the mid 70's the tabloid andGlam- mags wold try to give the
Farah Fawcett photos "cleavage" where there was none.

Maybe they were before and after her implants?

wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:31:33 -0800, Tim wrote:


Kinda like the mid 70's the tabloid andGlam- mags wold try to give the
Farah Fawcett photos "cleavage" where there was none.

Maybe they were before and after her implants?

Who the hell carried about her cleavage, it was her nips that got my
attention.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:31:33 -0800, Tim wrote:


Kinda like the mid 70's the tabloid andGlam- mags wold try to give the
Farah Fawcett photos "cleavage" where there was none.

Maybe they were before and after her implants?

Who the hell carried about her cleavage, it was her nips that got my
attention.

You're too small minded, Reggie.

Think BIG!

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:05:16 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:14:25 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:



Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:31:33 -0800, Tim wrote:


Kinda like the mid 70's the tabloid andGlam- mags wold try to give the
Farah Fawcett photos "cleavage" where there was none.

Maybe they were before and after her implants?

Who the hell carried about her cleavage, it was her nips that got my
attention.

You're too small minded, Reggie.

Think BIG!

You must be a "hair" man. That was the biggest thing Farah had

Nope.

Her hair dude, her hair.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:05:16 -0500, wrote:


You must be a "hair" man. That was the biggest thing Farah had

Nope.

Her hair dude, her hair.

That reminds me of the old one-liner.

The reason blonds have that tall hair is to hide the valve stem.