On Feb 22, 8:52�am, wrote:


Is it me!?

No. It would be somebody whose actions were compelled by the dislike
of somebody else and who was so fixated on his or her nemesis
that it disrupted reality as commonly perceived by a healthy adult.

Folks who launch attack threads, particularly those who launch them
repeatedly and frequently, may begin to fit the general description.

On Feb 22, 1:30Â*pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 22, 8:52�am, wrote:



Is it me!?

No. It would be somebody whose actions were compelled by the dislike
of somebody else and who was so fixated on his or her nemesis
that it disrupted reality as commonly perceived by a healthy adult.

Folks who launch attack threads, particularly those who launch them
repeatedly and frequently, may begin to fit the general description.

Then stop.

On Feb 22, 10:54Â*am, wrote:
On Feb 22, 1:30Â*pm, Chuck Gould wrote:

On Feb 22, 8:52�am, wrote:

Is it me!?

No. It would be somebody whose actions were compelled by the dislike
of somebody else and who was so fixated on his or her nemesis
that it disrupted reality as commonly perceived by a healthy adult.

Folks who launch attack threads, particularly those who launch them
repeatedly and frequently, may begin to fit the general description.

Then stop.

Why, does it sound like someone here? :-)

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 22, 10:54 am, wrote:
On Feb 22, 1:30 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:

On Feb 22, 8:52�am, wrote:
Is it me!?
No. It would be somebody whose actions were compelled by the dislike
of somebody else and who was so fixated on his or her nemesis
that it disrupted reality as commonly perceived by a healthy adult.
Folks who launch attack threads, particularly those who launch them
repeatedly and frequently, may begin to fit the general description.
Then stop.

Why, does it sound like someone here? :-)


You're far too subtle for concrete boy. :-)

On Feb 22, 6:58Â*pm, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 22, 10:54 am, wrote:
On Feb 22, 1:30 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:

On Feb 22, 8:52�am, wrote:
Is it me!?
No. It would be somebody whose actions were compelled by the dislike
of somebody else and who was so fixated on his or her nemesis
that it disrupted reality as commonly perceived by a healthy adult.
Folks who launch attack threads, particularly those who launch them
repeatedly and frequently, may begin to fit the general description.
Then stop.

Why, does it sound like someone here? Â*:-)

You're far too subtle for concrete boy. :-)

Gee, Harry, your childish name calling certainly doesn't do much for
your bid to try and make everyone here believe you are refined and
cultured.....Now tell us more about that Zimmerman like lobster
boat......

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:30:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Feb 22, 8:52?am, wrote:


Is it me!?

No. It would be somebody whose actions were compelled by the dislike
of somebody else and who was so fixated on his or her nemesis
that it disrupted reality as commonly perceived by a healthy adult.

Folks who launch attack threads, particularly those who launch them
repeatedly and frequently, may begin to fit the general description.

What happens when someone has about 22 of those nemeses guys?
--
John H

On Feb 22, 3:30�pm, John H. wrote:


What happens when someone has about 22 of those nemeses guys?

The whole NG goes to hell.

As far as people who are so upset with somebody else that they have
their wife spending time paging through 40-50 year old issues of the
NYT looking for any mention of a "fire boat welcome", who can't let
any thread run very far without adding some nonsense about a
"Zimmerman-like lobsta boat", and who routinely launch a thread for
the express purpose of attacking another poster in the NG? There are
closer to two than to 22.

Most of the attack posters hide behind anonymous handles, and there is
no reason to believe that some of them aren't using a couple of sock
puppets to reinforce their hateful message.

Closer to 2 than 22, by far.

Obsessive: Those poor guys are consumed with their own disdain for
another person, probably beyond the point where it's healthy.

Compulsve: Several people post compulsively here, ("Hey, I just bought
a new bicycle, went out to dinner, visited a relative, got new tires
for the pickup, etc".....several times a week). But not all are
obsessed with a single subject or individual.

Nenesis fixation: Pretty obvious, just look at the content.

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:04:15 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Feb 22, 3:30?pm, John H. wrote:


What happens when someone has about 22 of those nemeses guys?

The whole NG goes to hell.

As far as people who are so upset with somebody else that they have
their wife spending time paging through 40-50 year old issues of the
NYT looking for any mention of a "fire boat welcome", who can't let
any thread run very far without adding some nonsense about a
"Zimmerman-like lobsta boat", and who routinely launch a thread for
the express purpose of attacking another poster in the NG? There are
closer to two than to 22.

Most of the attack posters hide behind anonymous handles, and there is
no reason to believe that some of them aren't using a couple of sock
puppets to reinforce their hateful message.

Closer to 2 than 22, by far.

Obsessive: Those poor guys are consumed with their own disdain for
another person, probably beyond the point where it's healthy.

Compulsve: Several people post compulsively here, ("Hey, I just bought
a new bicycle, went out to dinner, visited a relative, got new tires
for the pickup, etc".....several times a week). But not all are
obsessed with a single subject or individual.

Nenesis fixation: Pretty obvious, just look at the content.

I think it's much closer to 22, Chuck!
--
John H