BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/...delegates.html



Well, you've convinced me...I definitely will NOT vote for ANY
Republicans this fall. Thanks.

If it was anyone else I would be shocked that they condone the
buying and selling of the Democrat nomination.

Now I understand why you have "SuperDelegates!"


Are you really stupid enough to believe that "campaign
contributions" don't take place on the Republican side?


We don't have superdelegates for sale. Why does the Democrat party
have superdelegates?


What do you care? You aren't voting for Democratic candidates. BTW,
I notice that John McCain has now flip-flopped on waterboarding.
Didn't take long for the whore element of the GOP to beat him into
submission.

I think it is hilarious that the Democrat party, wanting to be known
as the Democratic party, has an undeomcratic process for determining
their presidential nominee.

Pretty soon we will have him chasing ILLEGAL aliens of all ethnic,
cultural and national origin from the USA bat to their home countries.

Then we can work on making the "Bush" tax cuts permanent.

SC justices like Alito.

But, we are not going to pay delegates to vote for or against him.



Your GOP thugs can pressure McCain anyway you like. The more you drive
him to the right, the worse your election results will be.

Go for it.

Principal over expediency.

In 1980 I could have voted for Carter to protect my cushie government
job but, I went for principal and pulled the lever for Ronald Wilson
Reagan, God bless his soul.



That would be principle, dummy. Two different words. If you had stayed
in high school, you might have learned the meaning of the two words.

Hey, I don't give a damn how far to the right McCain has to go to
placate the right-wing lunatics in the GOP. The further right he goes,
the worse he does. As for "principle," that is something you far
righties wouldn't recognize if you fell into a barrel of it.

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:50:48 -0500, HK wrote:

BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/...delegates.html



Well, you've convinced me...I definitely will NOT vote for ANY
Republicans this fall. Thanks.

If it was anyone else I would be shocked that they condone the
buying and selling of the Democrat nomination.

Now I understand why you have "SuperDelegates!"


Are you really stupid enough to believe that "campaign
contributions" don't take place on the Republican side?


We don't have superdelegates for sale. Why does the Democrat party
have superdelegates?


What do you care? You aren't voting for Democratic candidates. BTW,
I notice that John McCain has now flip-flopped on waterboarding.
Didn't take long for the whore element of the GOP to beat him into
submission.

I think it is hilarious that the Democrat party, wanting to be known
as the Democratic party, has an undeomcratic process for determining
their presidential nominee.

Pretty soon we will have him chasing ILLEGAL aliens of all ethnic,
cultural and national origin from the USA bat to their home countries.

Then we can work on making the "Bush" tax cuts permanent.

SC justices like Alito.

But, we are not going to pay delegates to vote for or against him.



Your GOP thugs can pressure McCain anyway you like. The more you drive
him to the right, the worse your election results will be.

Go for it.

Principal over expediency.

In 1980 I could have voted for Carter to protect my cushie government
job but, I went for principal and pulled the lever for Ronald Wilson
Reagan, God bless his soul.



That would be principle, dummy. Two different words. If you had stayed
in high school, you might have learned the meaning of the two words.

Hey, I don't give a damn how far to the right McCain has to go to
placate the right-wing lunatics in the GOP. The further right he goes,
the worse he does. As for "principle," that is something you far
righties wouldn't recognize if you fell into a barrel of it.

Didn't you mean 'most of you righties'?
--
John H