Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
GI Bill
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:01:14 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:22:34 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: Saw Jim Webb on C-Span a while ago talking about his and Chuck Hagel's attempt to get the GI Bill back to where it was before Reagan. I think the guys putting their lives on the line for us in Iraq and Afghanistan deserve that. Webb said the educational benefits of that bill returned 7 to 1 (tax revenues vs costs.) I'm sure it did in my case. Probably more. Republicans in the Senate are generally not supporting it. Creeps. Once again, the Korean and Vietnam vets get it tucked straight up the ass. Moron. By now, I'd think the Korean and Vietnam vets would have used whatever GI Bill education benefits they wanted to use. Webb makes it sound as though the current crop of folks leaving the military get nothing. They will receive about $1100 per month. Tuition at George Mason University is $3420 for a full time student taking 12-16 hours. That doesn't seem like such a bad deal to me. -- John H |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
GI Bill
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:32:10 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:01:14 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:22:34 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: Saw Jim Webb on C-Span a while ago talking about his and Chuck Hagel's attempt to get the GI Bill back to where it was before Reagan. I think the guys putting their lives on the line for us in Iraq and Afghanistan deserve that. Webb said the educational benefits of that bill returned 7 to 1 (tax revenues vs costs.) I'm sure it did in my case. Probably more. Republicans in the Senate are generally not supporting it. Creeps. Once again, the Korean and Vietnam vets get it tucked straight up the ass. Moron. By now, I'd think the Korean and Vietnam vets would have used whatever GI Bill education benefits they wanted to use. Webb makes it sound as though the current crop of folks leaving the military get nothing. They will receive about $1100 per month. Tuition at George Mason University is $3420 for a full time student taking 12-16 hours. That doesn't seem like such a bad deal to me. My understanding of current GI bill is that you have to contribute if you want ed benefits. I seem to remember when they changed it it was quite a downgrade from what I had. Of course pay was quite a bit higher too, so the bite maybe wasn't as bad as it looked to me. --Vic |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
GI Bill
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:35:49 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:32:10 -0500, John H. wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:01:14 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:22:34 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: Saw Jim Webb on C-Span a while ago talking about his and Chuck Hagel's attempt to get the GI Bill back to where it was before Reagan. I think the guys putting their lives on the line for us in Iraq and Afghanistan deserve that. Webb said the educational benefits of that bill returned 7 to 1 (tax revenues vs costs.) I'm sure it did in my case. Probably more. Republicans in the Senate are generally not supporting it. Creeps. Once again, the Korean and Vietnam vets get it tucked straight up the ass. Moron. By now, I'd think the Korean and Vietnam vets would have used whatever GI Bill education benefits they wanted to use. Webb makes it sound as though the current crop of folks leaving the military get nothing. They will receive about $1100 per month. Tuition at George Mason University is $3420 for a full time student taking 12-16 hours. That doesn't seem like such a bad deal to me. My understanding of current GI bill is that you have to contribute if you want ed benefits. I seem to remember when they changed it it was quite a downgrade from what I had. Of course pay was quite a bit higher too, so the bite maybe wasn't as bad as it looked to me. --Vic Yes, the contribution is $100 per month for the first 12 months. That was instituted to get soldiers 'vested' and interested so they would actually use the benefits. So they pay $1200 and in return get a little over $39,600. Not a bad investment, if they use it. -- John H |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
GI Bill
"John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:35:49 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: My understanding of current GI bill is that you have to contribute if you want ed benefits. I seem to remember when they changed it it was quite a downgrade from what I had. Of course pay was quite a bit higher too, so the bite maybe wasn't as bad as it looked to me. --Vic Yes, the contribution is $100 per month for the first 12 months. That was instituted to get soldiers 'vested' and interested so they would actually use the benefits. So they pay $1200 and in return get a little over $39,600. Not a bad investment, if they use it. -- John H I have a hazy memory of it working that way when I entered the service, so it was in effect in 1968. We signed some paperwork (with significant encouragement to do so) authorizing the deduction from our pay when we entered boot camp. Eisboch |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
GI Bill
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:57:19 -0500, John H.
wrote: Yes, the contribution is $100 per month for the first 12 months. That was instituted to get soldiers 'vested' and interested so they would actually use the benefits. So they pay $1200 and in return get a little over $39,600. Not a bad investment, if they use it. That's a lot better than I understood it to be back when. --Vic |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
GI Bill
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:35:49 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:32:10 -0500, John H. wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:01:14 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:22:34 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: Saw Jim Webb on C-Span a while ago talking about his and Chuck Hagel's attempt to get the GI Bill back to where it was before Reagan. I think the guys putting their lives on the line for us in Iraq and Afghanistan deserve that. Webb said the educational benefits of that bill returned 7 to 1 (tax revenues vs costs.) I'm sure it did in my case. Probably more. Republicans in the Senate are generally not supporting it. Creeps. Once again, the Korean and Vietnam vets get it tucked straight up the ass. Moron. By now, I'd think the Korean and Vietnam vets would have used whatever GI Bill education benefits they wanted to use. Webb makes it sound as though the current crop of folks leaving the military get nothing. They will receive about $1100 per month. Tuition at George Mason University is $3420 for a full time student taking 12-16 hours. That doesn't seem like such a bad deal to me. My understanding of current GI bill is that you have to contribute if you want ed benefits. I seem to remember when they changed it it was quite a downgrade from what I had. Of course pay was quite a bit higher too, so the bite maybe wasn't as bad as it looked to me. --Vic Yes, the contribution is $100 per month for the first 12 months. That was instituted to get soldiers 'vested' and interested so they would actually use the benefits. So they pay $1200 and in return get a little over $39,600. Not a bad investment, if they use it. $1200 buys a portion of a car, lots of beer, some tattoos and you can date the colonel's daughter. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
GI Bill
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: .. Once again, the Korean and Vietnam vets get it tucked straight up the ass. Moron. Tucked? how about "CRAMMED!" |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
GI Bill
On Feb 13, 11:43*am, Tim wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: . Once again, the Korean and Vietnam vets get it tucked straight up the ass. Moron. Tucked? how about "CRAMMED!" Or replace the "t" with an "f"...... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bill the new guy | ASA | |||
S-786 NWS bill | Cruising | |||
Hey, Bill | ASA | |||
Hey Bill | ASA |