JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:01:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...

3. A beginning of a real program to provide access to health
insurance
for all.
This one and number 6 go well together. Let's see...double the tax rates
anyone?
Guess how much I pay for health insurance, John. Just me, not a family
plan.

Stupid question. Look at you.


Stupid response, but I understand why you are terrified of answering the
question.



4. An end to the anti-abortion b.s. legislation and possible Supreme
Court decisions with the first appointment or two to that court.
Hell, baby killing is nothing! Not giving terrorists their
'constitutional'
rights is horrid.

The abortion issue is actually not something politicians care about or
want
to deal with. They use it as a tool, a wedge. It's a good tool because it
involves babies and religion, so it makes for fabulously emotional
debates.
But, it will never EVER be an issue that anyone agrees on. Same with gun
control, although that's even stickier because all anyone can do with that
is debate the meaning of one sentence in the 2nd amendment.

You need to tell Harry. It sounds like an issue that should be left to the
states.

The gun control issue should reach a head in June, when the Supreme Court
get to the DC issue.
--
John H

It's probably settle nothing, except maybe for questions about the specific
law in DC. Not anywhere else, though.





The abortion issue is only an issue to anti-abortionists. I suggest they
not get one, and if their teen-aged daughters get knocked up, why, let
those daughters bear the consequences along with the child.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:01:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...

3. A beginning of a real program to provide access to health
insurance
for all.
This one and number 6 go well together. Let's see...double the tax rates
anyone?
Guess how much I pay for health insurance, John. Just me, not a family
plan.

Stupid question. Look at you.


Stupid response, but I understand why you are terrified of answering the
question.



4. An end to the anti-abortion b.s. legislation and possible Supreme
Court decisions with the first appointment or two to that court.
Hell, baby killing is nothing! Not giving terrorists their
'constitutional'
rights is horrid.

The abortion issue is actually not something politicians care about or
want
to deal with. They use it as a tool, a wedge. It's a good tool because it
involves babies and religion, so it makes for fabulously emotional
debates.
But, it will never EVER be an issue that anyone agrees on. Same with gun
control, although that's even stickier because all anyone can do with that
is debate the meaning of one sentence in the 2nd amendment.

You need to tell Harry. It sounds like an issue that should be left to the
states.

The gun control issue should reach a head in June, when the Supreme Court
get to the DC issue.
--
John H

It's probably settle nothing, except maybe for questions about the specific
law in DC. Not anywhere else, though.

It will provide the current judicial view on the 2nd amendment which
will be followed by the federal courts across the country.

"John H." wrote in message
...
snip..
Open borders? Legal Latinos aren't 'demonized'. Illegal aliens, whether
Latino or not, should not be here.

And much more.

snip
John H

You'd be well served to quit demonizing Latinos and spend that time learning
Spanish.
Your future may depend on it.

Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
snip..
Open borders? Legal Latinos aren't 'demonized'. Illegal aliens, whether
Latino or not, should not be here.

And much more.

snip
John H

You'd be well served to quit demonizing Latinos and spend that time learning
Spanish.
Your future may depend on it.




I wonder if any of his grandchildren are old enough or strong enough to
push his wheelchair down the street for his Latino neighbors' upcoming
barbecue?

I'm sure they'd love to welcome the guy that puts down their existence
and mistaught their children.

On Feb 13, 10:12*am, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:01:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
.. .

3. A beginning of a real program to provide access to health insurance
for all.

This one and number 6 go well together. Let's see...double the tax rates
anyone?

Guess how much I pay for health insurance, John. Just me, not a family plan.

Stupid question. Look at you.


LOL

On Feb 13, 10:18*am, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:01:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...

3. A beginning of a real program to provide access to health
insurance
for all.
This one and number 6 go well together. Let's see...double the tax rates
anyone?
Guess how much I pay for health insurance, John. Just me, not a family
plan.

Stupid question. Look at you.

Stupid response, but I understand why you are terrified of answering the
question.

4. An end to the anti-abortion b.s. legislation and possible Supreme
Court decisions with the first appointment or two to that court.
Hell, baby killing is nothing! Not giving terrorists their
'constitutional'
rights is horrid.

The abortion issue is actually not something politicians care about or
want
to deal with. They use it as a tool, a wedge. It's a good tool because it
involves babies and religion, so it makes for fabulously emotional
debates.
But, it will never EVER be an issue that anyone agrees on. Same with gun
control, although that's even stickier because all anyone can do with that
is debate the meaning of one sentence in the 2nd amendment.

You need to tell Harry. It sounds like an issue that should be left to the
states.

The gun control issue should reach a head in June, when the Supreme Court
get to the DC issue.
--
John H

It's probably settle nothing, except maybe for questions about the specific
law in DC. Not anywhere else, though.

The abortion issue is only an issue to anti-abortionists. I suggest they
not get one, and if their teen-aged daughters get knocked up, why, let
those daughters bear the consequences along with the child.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yup, even if she was a minor raped by a family memeber or other
adult.. Yup, it's her fault, let's punish her, but not the adult who
was only excercising his free will, taking her for an abortion. Well,
unless that adult happens to be a parent, then they have no say..

HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:01:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...

3. A beginning of a real program to provide access to health
insurance
for all.
This one and number 6 go well together. Let's see...double the tax
rates
anyone?
Guess how much I pay for health insurance, John. Just me, not a
family plan.

Stupid question. Look at you.


Stupid response, but I understand why you are terrified of answering
the question.



4. An end to the anti-abortion b.s. legislation and possible
Supreme
Court decisions with the first appointment or two to that court.
Hell, baby killing is nothing! Not giving terrorists their
'constitutional'
rights is horrid.

The abortion issue is actually not something politicians care about
or want
to deal with. They use it as a tool, a wedge. It's a good tool
because it
involves babies and religion, so it makes for fabulously emotional
debates.
But, it will never EVER be an issue that anyone agrees on. Same with
gun
control, although that's even stickier because all anyone can do
with that
is debate the meaning of one sentence in the 2nd amendment.

You need to tell Harry. It sounds like an issue that should be left
to the
states.

The gun control issue should reach a head in June, when the Supreme
Court
get to the DC issue.
--
John H

It's probably settle nothing, except maybe for questions about the
specific law in DC. Not anywhere else, though.




The abortion issue is only an issue to anti-abortionists. I suggest they
not get one, and if their teen-aged daughters get knocked up, why, let
those daughters bear the consequences along with the child.

Why do you deny the death penalty for convicted murders and rapists but,
an unborn child can be subjected to the death penalty anytime the mother
wants. The its her body argument falls apart when someone is charged for
the killing of a mother and her fetus. The hypocrisy of the pro-abortion
crowd is constantly visible.

wrote:
On Feb 13, 10:18 am, HK wrote:



The abortion issue is only an issue to anti-abortionists. I suggest they
not get one, and if their teen-aged daughters get knocked up, why, let
those daughters bear the consequences along with the child.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yup, even if she was a minor raped by a family memeber or other
adult.. Yup, it's her fault, let's punish her, but not the adult who
was only excercising his free will, taking her for an abortion. Well,
unless that adult happens to be a parent, then they have no say..




D'oh. I suppose the irony went right over your head, as usual.

I favor an unrestricted right to access a safe abortion by any female
who seeks one, with the decision entirely up to the female and her
medical advisor. I support Roe v. Wade, which states, briefly:

a woman and her doctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during
the first trimester,

state governments can restrict abortion access after the first trimester
with laws intended to protect the woman's health, and,

abortions after fetal viability must be available if the woman's health
or life are at risk; state governments can prohibit other abortions.


President Clinton or President Obama will guard those rights. President
McCain will not. I will not be voting for John McCain.

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:18:19 -0500, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:01:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...

3. A beginning of a real program to provide access to health
insurance
for all.
This one and number 6 go well together. Let's see...double the tax rates
anyone?
Guess how much I pay for health insurance, John. Just me, not a family
plan.

Stupid question. Look at you.


Stupid response, but I understand why you are terrified of answering the
question.



4. An end to the anti-abortion b.s. legislation and possible Supreme
Court decisions with the first appointment or two to that court.
Hell, baby killing is nothing! Not giving terrorists their
'constitutional'
rights is horrid.

The abortion issue is actually not something politicians care about or
want
to deal with. They use it as a tool, a wedge. It's a good tool because it
involves babies and religion, so it makes for fabulously emotional
debates.
But, it will never EVER be an issue that anyone agrees on. Same with gun
control, although that's even stickier because all anyone can do with that
is debate the meaning of one sentence in the 2nd amendment.

You need to tell Harry. It sounds like an issue that should be left to the
states.

The gun control issue should reach a head in June, when the Supreme Court
get to the DC issue.
--
John H

It's probably settle nothing, except maybe for questions about the specific
law in DC. Not anywhere else, though.





The abortion issue is only an issue to anti-abortionists.

That's a classic, Harry. Killing babies is an issue only to those who
believe murder is wrong.

I suggest they
not get one, and if their teen-aged daughters get knocked up, why, let
those daughters bear the consequences along with the child.

Adoption. Killing the baby violates the rights of the baby.
--
John H

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:12:56 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:01:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...

3. A beginning of a real program to provide access to health
insurance
for all.

This one and number 6 go well together. Let's see...double the tax rates
anyone?

Guess how much I pay for health insurance, John. Just me, not a family
plan.

Stupid question. Look at you.


Stupid response, but I understand why you are terrified of answering the
question.



4. An end to the anti-abortion b.s. legislation and possible Supreme
Court decisions with the first appointment or two to that court.

Hell, baby killing is nothing! Not giving terrorists their
'constitutional'
rights is horrid.


The abortion issue is actually not something politicians care about or
want
to deal with. They use it as a tool, a wedge. It's a good tool because it
involves babies and religion, so it makes for fabulously emotional
debates.
But, it will never EVER be an issue that anyone agrees on. Same with gun
control, although that's even stickier because all anyone can do with that
is debate the meaning of one sentence in the 2nd amendment.


You need to tell Harry. It sounds like an issue that should be left to the
states.

The gun control issue should reach a head in June, when the Supreme Court
get to the DC issue.
--
John H

It's probably settle nothing, except maybe for questions about the specific
law in DC. Not anywhere else, though.


You're suggesting I'm terrified to take a guess? Here's a guess. I 'guess'
that you pay $3200/month in health insurance. From what I've seen and read,
that would be a reasonable amount.
--
John H