Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:25:34 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:07:15 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Feb 10, 9:15?am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:06:06 -0800, Chuck Gould wrote: Compare the average level of educational achievement on, say, the left coast with the average education in customarily red states like Mississippi, Alabama, Missouri. Then reevaluate. Thanks. It's worse than that: http://www.thebluestate.com/2005/10/...06_smarte.html Note, the 21 states that spend the least on education, are all red. I always get a kick out of the rationalization that education (or money spent on it) ?automatically implies"smartness" in people. There's a lot of stupid people with years of advanced degrees, just as there are many "smart" people with limited education. Eisboch I agree with you entirely. The basis for even considering education in the discussion was a claim that D's oppose "No Child Left Behind", and thaty they do so because if the amount of education were increased across the country the number of people supporting the D's would decrease. Talk to middle and high school teachers about NCLB and see what they say about the system. It's a total disaster. And in states that require mainstreaming of those children who are developmentally, physically, mentally or emotionally "challenged", it's almost impossible to achieve the standards required by NCLB. How one thinks education is a state function is beyond me, other than for the establishment of overall standards. Using the challenged as an example of why NCLB doesn't work makes very little sense. In states with a very strong teachers' union, NCLB doesn't work. Why? Because the unions don't like their teachers having to meet standards. To say that standards shouldn't be used to judge the educational process makes absolutely no sense. To say that children shouldn't be taught a curriculum which enables them to meet the standards makes even less sense. To say that children shouldn't be tested to ensure they meet the standards makes the least sense of all. -- John H |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Winners and Losers | ASA | |||
Liberals are *LOSERS* | General | |||
HEY LOSERS | General | |||
A lot of losers | General | |||
Get Ready, Losers! | ASA |