LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,515
Default TV off...bad storms...So, who won what last night?

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"hk" wrote in message
. ..




There is no need to speculate over how many might be dead if Saddam were
still in power. What's the point of that? The point is, Bush's actions
resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and for
what? For Bush's personal political reasons.


For many reasons beside any personal political reasons.

Many in Congress were calling to "disarm" Saddam during the Clinton
administration and many of the most vocal were Dems. (We've already
covered that and the "Intel" issue, yet the left continues to brush that
fact aside.) The primary issue was Saddam's increasing refusal to comply
with the UN resolutions agreed to and signed by Iraq after it was chased
out of Kuwait, with Saddam being allowed to stay in power.

Clinton's only action, other than parroting the above in speeches, was to
lob a bunch of cruise missiles that accomplished nothing. (Many believe
it was a "wag the dog" effort to distract media attention from his
personal problems with "that woman".) Who knows for sure?

The same Intel existed when Bush entered office. 9/11 put the US on a war
footing against terrorism. He immediately went after bin Laden, having to
first demolish the Taliban who were providing protection, and, receiving
the same Intel about Iraq, including the threats of nuclear and biological
WMDs that Clinton had, he made a case of it and demanded that Saddam
comply with the UN resolutions. This demand was made despite the UN's
weakness in doing anything to enforce their own resolutions. Saddam was
given plenty of opportunity to comply, but became more resistant, buying
time (to do what?). Even the chief UN weapons inspector, Kay, believed
WMDs existed at this time and was venting his frustration at Saddam's
stalling activities. (Kay later joined the anti-Bush conspiracy gang when
events cast a shadow on his own believability.)

Everything since then has been pure speculation by the conspiracy lovers.

That's what I think.

Eisboch



And yet, Bush never went after the country from which most of the 9/11 thugs
originated. Do you find anything wrong with that at all???


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A night before ........... Wm Shakespeare Smithers General 1 December 15th 05 07:20 PM
Security in Storms Joshua Slocum ASA 0 April 9th 05 11:48 PM
Night Vision Dennis Vogel ASA 11 August 1st 04 05:56 AM
Night Night, my little fishies! Bobsprit ASA 3 January 27th 04 04:03 AM
A Night to Remember Bobsprit ASA 2 July 19th 03 03:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017