On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:22:08 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Feb 8, 9:26*pm, BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 5, 1:53 pm, John H. wrote:
Sorry I didn't answer your last to me, but I was just laughing too hard!
--
John H

You can't even figure out the primary function of a bomber!

It's primary purpose is a weapons delivery platform.

It can also be used as a threat, in some cases making the use as a
delivery system unnecessary..

Both comments are true, but the peaceniks among us implied we never had use
for either a threat or a platform, that the plane was a 'waste of money'.
--
John H

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:22:08 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Feb 8, 9:26 pm, BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 5, 1:53 pm, John H. wrote:
Sorry I didn't answer your last to me, but I was just laughing too
hard!
--
John H

You can't even figure out the primary function of a bomber!

It's primary purpose is a weapons delivery platform.

It can also be used as a threat, in some cases making the use as a
delivery system unnecessary..

Both comments are true, but the peaceniks among us implied we never had
use
for either a threat or a platform, that the plane was a 'waste of money'.
--
John H

Let's ban all weapons world wide. In future wars we'll just have name
calling attacks.

Now we have to find someone judge the "battles" and declare a winner.

Volunteers?

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 08:10:16 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:22:08 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Feb 8, 9:26 pm, BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 5, 1:53 pm, John H. wrote:
Sorry I didn't answer your last to me, but I was just laughing too
hard!
--
John H

You can't even figure out the primary function of a bomber!

It's primary purpose is a weapons delivery platform.

It can also be used as a threat, in some cases making the use as a
delivery system unnecessary..

Both comments are true, but the peaceniks among us implied we never had
use
for either a threat or a platform, that the plane was a 'waste of money'.
--
John H

Let's ban all weapons world wide. In future wars we'll just have name
calling attacks.

Now we have to find someone judge the "battles" and declare a winner.

Volunteers?


If we let the best of the name-callers amongst us be the judge, we'd all
better learn Spanish followed by Chinese.
--
John H

On Feb 9, 8:00*am, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:22:08 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Feb 8, 9:26*pm, BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 5, 1:53 pm, John H. wrote:
Sorry I didn't answer your last to me, but I was just laughing too hard!
--
John H

You can't even figure out the primary function of a bomber!

It's primary purpose is a weapons delivery platform.

It can also be used as a threat, in some cases making the use as a
delivery system unnecessary..

Both comments are true, but the peaceniks among us implied we never had use
for either a threat or a platform, that the plane was a 'waste of money'.
--
John H

For the most part the Peacenicks are neither peacful or informed.. who
really cares what they think, Give them a bottle and a pacifier and
get back to work...