Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT We aren't protected
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962). ......unless I'm John H. And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order? Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in this discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens. I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised. Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later referred to as right wing trash or some such thing. Is it that hard to keep your stories straight? -- John H You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this. You know it all, Doug. -- John H What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone again that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai. |
#32
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT We aren't protected
"John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:28:29 -0500, HK wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962). ......unless I'm John H. And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order? One can be sure that a spineless lump of defecation like Herring did precisely as he was told. You're so cool, Harry. -- John H That's rich John. A draft dodger using the word spineless on another person. |
#33
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT We aren't protected
"HK" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962). ......unless I'm John H. And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order? One can be sure that a spineless lump of defecation like Herring did precisely as he was told. sort of like you an Ullico? |
#34
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT We aren't protected
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962). ......unless I'm John H. And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order? Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in this discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens. I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised. Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later referred to as right wing trash or some such thing. Is it that hard to keep your stories straight? -- John H You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this. You know it all, Doug. -- John H What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone again that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai. You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from Harry? -- John H |
#35
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT We aren't protected
"John H." wrote in message
... On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962). ......unless I'm John H. And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order? Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in this discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens. I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised. Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later referred to as right wing trash or some such thing. Is it that hard to keep your stories straight? -- John H You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this. You know it all, Doug. -- John H What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone again that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai. You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from Harry? -- John H Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you pegged. When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first load to go. If I lived closer, I'd be honored to help. |
#36
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT We aren't protected
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962). ......unless I'm John H. And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order? Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in this discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens. I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised. Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later referred to as right wing trash or some such thing. Is it that hard to keep your stories straight? -- John H You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this. You know it all, Doug. -- John H What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone again that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai. You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from Harry? -- John H Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you pegged. When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first load to go. If I lived closer, I'd be honored to help. Hehehe. You go, guy! |
#37
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT We aren't protected
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:45:20 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message .. . "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962). ......unless I'm John H. And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order? Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in this discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens. I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised. Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later referred to as right wing trash or some such thing. Is it that hard to keep your stories straight? -- John H You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this. You know it all, Doug. -- John H What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone again that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai. You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from Harry? -- John H Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you pegged. When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first load to go. If I lived closer, I'd be honored to help. RM second to the L to you. -- John H |
#38
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT We aren't protected
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:53:28 -0500, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962). ......unless I'm John H. And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order? Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in this discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens. I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised. Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later referred to as right wing trash or some such thing. Is it that hard to keep your stories straight? -- John H You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this. You know it all, Doug. -- John H What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone again that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai. You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from Harry? -- John H Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you pegged. When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first load to go. If I lived closer, I'd be honored to help. Hehehe. You go, guy! My gosh, two of you! Now let's see, just what am I supposed to point at the front door - a pistol? 30-30? 12 Gauge? Oh my, I can't remember. -- John H |
#39
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT We aren't protected
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:53:28 -0500, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962). ......unless I'm John H. And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order? Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in this discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens. I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised. Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later referred to as right wing trash or some such thing. Is it that hard to keep your stories straight? -- John H You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this. You know it all, Doug. -- John H What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone again that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai. You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from Harry? -- John H Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you pegged. When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first load to go. If I lived closer, I'd be honored to help. Hehehe. You go, guy! My gosh, two of you! Now let's see, just what am I supposed to point at the front door - a pistol? 30-30? 12 Gauge? Oh my, I can't remember. Harry used to be the guy who said only those with tiny dicks owned handguns. I am not sure why Harry likes to talk about male genitalia so much, nor why he decided he need to shot beer cans and stumps. I would think someone who considered himself an environmentalist, would not want to spread lead all over the wilderness negatively impacting the wildlife. But then again, we are talking about Harry. Now he is high fiveing someone who is endorsing the concept of genocide for those with different political philosophy. |
#40
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT We aren't protected
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. .. John H. wrote: On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:53:28 -0500, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962). ......unless I'm John H. And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order? Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in this discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens. I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised. Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later referred to as right wing trash or some such thing. Is it that hard to keep your stories straight? -- John H You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this. You know it all, Doug. -- John H What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone again that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai. You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from Harry? -- John H Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you pegged. When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first load to go. If I lived closer, I'd be honored to help. Hehehe. You go, guy! My gosh, two of you! Now let's see, just what am I supposed to point at the front door - a pistol? 30-30? 12 Gauge? Oh my, I can't remember. Harry used to be the guy who said only those with tiny dicks owned handguns. I am not sure why Harry likes to talk about male genitalia so much, nor why he decided he need to shot beer cans and stumps. I would think someone who considered himself an environmentalist, would not want to spread lead all over the wilderness negatively impacting the wildlife. But then again, we are talking about Harry. Now he is high fiveing someone who is endorsing the concept of genocide for those with different political philosophy. Political philosophy??? Since when is approving of armed robbery a political philosophy? Try that line if you're ever being interviewed for jury duty. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Protected waters! | ASA | |||
New Permits will allow Longlining in Protected Areas | General | |||
Marine Protected Areas (MPA's) | General | |||
REQ: Crack MAXSEA V10 (Dongle protected) | ASA |