"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that
I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the
Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act
of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment
effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?

Calif Bill wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that
I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the
Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act
of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment
effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?




One can be sure that a spineless lump of defecation like Herring did
precisely as he was told.

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:03:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;
that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey
the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the
officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of
Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960
replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5
October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


Where did you fight, Doug, at the local school board meeting?
--
John H

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:28:29 -0500, HK wrote:

Calif Bill wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that
I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the
Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act
of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment
effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?




One can be sure that a spineless lump of defecation like Herring did
precisely as he was told.

You're so cool, Harry.
--
John H

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?



Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:03:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic;
that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will
obey
the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the
officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code
of
Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960
replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5
October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


Where did you fight, Doug, at the local school board meeting?
--
John H


How does that question relate to your apparent approval of armed robbery,
carried out by soldiers and cops?

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?



Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised.


Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H

On Feb 1, 6:34*pm, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:28:29 -0500, HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that
I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the
Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act
of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment
effective 5 October 1962).

......unless I'm John H.

And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?

One can be sure that a spineless lump of defecation like Herring did
precisely as he was told.

You're so cool, Harry.
--
John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Fighting with words is not cool.. I remember when I was a teen we used
to get drunk and box in the back yard, no gloves So one day this
friend of mine says to me wanna' go? I said ok cool and we headed for
the back yard. He was behind me when we were going down the back steps
and he says to me "hey, I hear you do a little boxing?" I said yeah a
little.. When I woke up from what I understand was a few seconds later
he was standing over me with a glass of "medicine" for me and he says,
"yeah, well I do street!" We all had a good laugh, I never turned my
back on him again....

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and
the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789,
with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?



Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in
this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised.


Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H


You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of
stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by
soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is
run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless
robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this.

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and
the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789,
with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?



Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in
this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised.


Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H


You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of
stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by
soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is
run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless
robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this.


You know it all, Doug.
--
John H