|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"John H." wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:19:15 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title. Change the subject. Another loss. You're batting 1000. -- John H No, it wasn't a change of subject. However, it *did* challenge your ability to think of multiple ideas at once, while also staying focused on breathing. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:19:15 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title. Change the subject. Another loss. You're batting 1000. -- John H No, it wasn't a change of subject. However, it *did* challenge your ability to think of multiple ideas at once, while also staying focused on breathing. The last time I actually saw Herring, several years ago, he was gasping after washing down his boat. Looked like he needed a respirator. Seriously, Doug, what are you trying to extract from these fleegs? There's not much there, and if you expect them to multitask in their grey matter, you're reaching. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:19:15 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title. Change the subject. Another loss. You're batting 1000. -- John H No, it wasn't a change of subject. However, it *did* challenge your ability to think of multiple ideas at once, while also staying focused on breathing. \ Name your 5. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:19:44 -0500, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:19:15 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title. Change the subject. Another loss. You're batting 1000. -- John H No, it wasn't a change of subject. However, it *did* challenge your ability to think of multiple ideas at once, while also staying focused on breathing. The last time I actually saw Herring, several years ago, he was gasping after washing down his boat. Looked like he needed a respirator. Seriously, Doug, what are you trying to extract from these fleegs? There's not much there, and if you expect them to multitask in their grey matter, you're reaching. Giving Doug some help, Harry? He's in dire need! -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:19:15 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title. Change the subject. Another loss. You're batting 1000. -- John H No, it wasn't a change of subject. However, it *did* challenge your ability to think of multiple ideas at once, while also staying focused on breathing. \ Name your 5. Not until I get a response from Bert. You're welcome to name yours, though. Matter of fact, if even have more than one, you're a winner. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 17, 9:32*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:19 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family.. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure, as soon as you answer my questions.. ========================= You want me to explain why we should not sell weapons to our enemies? I will answer the question for you, but first, I need to know what sort of historical foundation of learning you already have. That will determine how I answer the question. So, which books? And, each week, what news sources do you pay very close attention to? Name them all.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I asked you first, just answer my questions, stop making excuses. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:00:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:03:46 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: snippage Wasn't necessary. Just let 'em fly home. Problem solved. -- John H Odd. If the Saudis aren't at fault, and their country shouldn't be invaded (as claimed by some apologists here), why would they need to skip town so fast? The president can be hustled off to a secret cave in an emergency. Don't you think we're capable of hiding his family's friends? Answered. Go to sleep. -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
Awww, fer pity sakes!
Can't some of you trim the fat off some of these posts? JoeSpareBedroom View profile More options Jan 17, 5:00 pm Newsgroups: rec.boats From: "JoeSpareBedroom" Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:00:51 GMT Local: Thurs, Jan 17 2008 5:00 pm Subject: Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:03:46 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:08:12 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:32:06 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:19 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure, as soon as you answer my questions.. ========================= You want me to explain why we should not sell weapons to our enemies? I will answer the question for you, but first, I need to know what sort of historical foundation of learning you already have. That will determine how I answer the question. So, which books? And, each week, what news sources do you pay very close attention to? Name them all. While you're at it, were any non-military planes allowed to fly out of the US after all aircraft were grounded following 9/11? Which ones? Who was on them? Members of the Saudi royal family, for their protection. So what? -- John H Kennebunkport or Camp David can't be secured enough to protect people like that? Wasn't necessary. Just let 'em fly home. Problem solved. -- John H Odd. If the Saudis aren't at fault, and their country shouldn't be invaded (as claimed by some apologists here), why would they need to skip town so fast? The president can be hustled off to a secret cave in an emergency. Don't you think we're capable of hiding his family's friends? |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:53:14 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
Awww, fer pity sakes! Can't some of you trim the fat off some of these posts? JoeSpareBedroom View profile More options Jan 17, 5:00 pm Newsgroups: rec.boats From: "JoeSpareBedroom" Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:00:51 GMT Local: Thurs, Jan 17 2008 5:00 pm Subject: Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:03:46 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: Where did you find this? If you'd responded to my post of three hours earlier, you'd have seen it well trimmed. -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"John H." wrote in message
... Where did you find this? If you'd responded to my post of three hours earlier, you'd have seen it well trimmed. -- John H Tim views & posts from google, which makes things difficult for him. Whenever a user is totally lost in the thread, you can bet they're viewing the NG via google or worse, webtv. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... Where did you find this? If you'd responded to my post of three hours earlier, you'd have seen it well trimmed. -- John H Tim views & posts from google, which makes things difficult for him. Whenever a user is totally lost in the thread, you can bet they're viewing the NG via google or worse, webtv. Is there still "web tv"? |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"HK" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Where did you find this? If you'd responded to my post of three hours earlier, you'd have seen it well trimmed. -- John H Tim views & posts from google, which makes things difficult for him. Whenever a user is totally lost in the thread, you can bet they're viewing the NG via google or worse, webtv. Is there still "web tv"? Yes, believe it or not. Posts from its users often look like this. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:19:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Where did you find this? If you'd responded to my post of three hours earlier, you'd have seen it well trimmed. -- John H Tim views & posts from google, which makes things difficult for him. Whenever a user is totally lost in the thread, you can bet they're viewing the NG via google or worse, webtv. Oh. -- Red Herring |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On 16-Jan-2008, HK wrote: Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years That's not bad news for the GOP or the other party of federal predators. That means your rulers, or keepers, if you prefer. It's continued bad news for the sheep (and other forms of virtual livestock) that will shuffle to the polls and cast votes for much more of the same. Change? Hahahahahahhaha - a change in who is sticking it up your rears. What difference does it make which syndicate of scum and predators holds the long end of the stick?? The population of the US is responsible for the demise of what was the United States. Watch in November ..... same old sh&%, different names. The sheep are screwed again, not the rulers. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 18, 8:19*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... Where did you find this? If you'd responded to my post of three hours earlier, you'd have seen it well trimmed. -- John H Tim views &postsfrom google, which makes things difficult for him. Whenever a user is totally lost in the thread, you can bet they're viewing the NG via google or worse, webtv. I've never been to webtv... but I've "been to Oklahoma...." Yes, Google is simple, and a pain sometimes, but its FREE! |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"Tim" wrote in message
... On Jan 18, 8:19 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Where did you find this? If you'd responded to my post of three hours earlier, you'd have seen it well trimmed. -- John H Tim views &postsfrom google, which makes things difficult for him. Whenever a user is totally lost in the thread, you can bet they're viewing the NG via google or worse, webtv. I've never been to webtv... but I've "been to Oklahoma...." Yes, Google is simple, and a pain sometimes, but its FREE! ========================= That's exactly what it's worth, based on irrefutable evidence. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 18, 8:31*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. Where did you find this? If you'd responded to my post of three hours earlier, you'd have seen it well trimmed. -- John H Tim views & posts from google, which makes things difficult for him. Whenever a user is totally lost in the thread, you can bet they're viewing the NG via google or worse, webtv. Is there still "web tv"? Yes, believe it or not. Posts from its users often look like this.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And if you hit the "show quoted text" , unfortunately you get everything you've asked for. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...953?scoring=d& |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 20, 4:56*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
That's exactly what it's worth, based on irrefutable evidence. You mean.. it's actually worth THAT much??? |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"Tim" wrote in message
... On Jan 20, 4:56 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: That's exactly what it's worth, based on irrefutable evidence. You mean.. it's actually worth THAT much??? =============== Doesn't your ISP offer newsgroup access? |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 20, 4:59*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 20, 4:56 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: That's exactly what it's worth, based on irrefutable evidence. You mean.. it's actually worth THAT much??? =============== Doesn't your ISP offer newsgroup access? Oh heck no. Not out here in BF Egypt. Oh it probably does, butThe guy that owns the ISP is a farmer, and I maintain his eguipment. So technically i get it free, but not free. Well, lets say, it's "payent in kind". and he doesn't have a huge set up anyhow. He does offer high speed 'net service at below the normal rates to his customers, but it's bare bones stuff. a'la carte. you want it you get it. But there's plenty of anti virus stuff out there for nothing as well,a nd even though I don't hardly use AOL anymore I'm on their "free edition" because I'm going though a seperate provider (I'm suprised they haven't tanked already). I do get some additional protection using their anti-bug stuff rovided w/AOL, and there's a bunch of other independant anti-bug stuff out there too! So, I don't want to say I'm "cheap" but seeing I don't really use the 'net for business, If I can save a buck, I'll do it. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:11:48 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Jan 20, 4:59*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 20, 4:56 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: That's exactly what it's worth, based on irrefutable evidence. You mean.. it's actually worth THAT much??? =============== Doesn't your ISP offer newsgroup access? Oh heck no. Not out here in BF Egypt. Oh it probably does, butThe guy that owns the ISP is a farmer, and I maintain his eguipment. So technically i get it free, but not free. Well, lets say, it's "payent in kind". and he doesn't have a huge set up anyhow. He does offer high speed 'net service at below the normal rates to his customers, but it's bare bones stuff. a'la carte. you want it you get it. But there's plenty of anti virus stuff out there for nothing as well,a nd even though I don't hardly use AOL anymore I'm on their "free edition" because I'm going though a seperate provider (I'm suprised they haven't tanked already). I do get some additional protection using their anti-bug stuff rovided w/AOL, and there's a bunch of other independant anti-bug stuff out there too! So, I don't want to say I'm "cheap" but seeing I don't really use the 'net for business, If I can save a buck, I'll do it. That's not cheap - that's miserly. :) With all that "free" stuff, you'd think you could at least get a decent news server. Hell, there are free servers out there - use one of them. This is one of the better ones - it's the descendant of the old Berlin news server. http://news.datemas.de/ Here's a list. http://ecalame.tripod.com/free.html Google sucks. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"Tim" wrote in message
... On Jan 20, 4:59 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 20, 4:56 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: That's exactly what it's worth, based on irrefutable evidence. You mean.. it's actually worth THAT much??? =============== Doesn't your ISP offer newsgroup access? Oh heck no. Not out here in BF Egypt. Oh it probably does, butThe guy that owns the ISP is a farmer, and I maintain his eguipment. So technically i get it free, but not free. Well, lets say, it's "payent in kind". and he doesn't have a huge set up anyhow. He does offer high speed 'net service at below the normal rates to his customers, but it's bare bones stuff. a'la carte. you want it you get it. But there's plenty of anti virus stuff out there for nothing as well,a nd even though I don't hardly use AOL anymore I'm on their "free edition" because I'm going though a seperate provider (I'm suprised they haven't tanked already). I do get some additional protection using their anti-bug stuff rovided w/AOL, and there's a bunch of other independant anti-bug stuff out there too! So, I don't want to say I'm "cheap" but seeing I don't really use the 'net for business, If I can save a buck, I'll do it. =================== You just explained so many things....much more than you intended to. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:11:48 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: So, I don't want to say I'm "cheap" but seeing I don't really use the 'net for business, If I can save a buck, I'll do it. Not that it matters to you, but some are filtering gmail to keep from seeing all the spam that emanates from there. Sort of like a spam bozo bin. Only reason I haven't done it is I might not see what you and Chuck have to say. Unacceptable. --Vic |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 20, 5:32*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: That's not cheap - that's miserly. *:) "Miserly?" or "Misery?" or both??? |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
Tim wrote:
On Jan 20, 5:32 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: That's not cheap - that's miserly. :) "Miserly?" or "Misery?" or both??? Should be an interesting boating season with dockside gas close to $4 a gallon. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 20, 6:06*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:11:48 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: So, I don't want to say I'm "cheap" but seeing I don't really use the 'net for business, If I can save a buck, I'll do it. Not that it matters to you, but some are filtering gmail to keep from seeing all the spam that emanates from there. Sort of like a spam bozo bin. Only reason I haven't done it is I might not see what you and Chuck have to say. *Unacceptable. --Vic I check the g-bozo bin every day and hardly ever does it catch anything of value. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
HK wrote:
Tim wrote: On Jan 20, 5:32 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: That's not cheap - that's miserly. :) "Miserly?" or "Misery?" or both??? Should be an interesting boating season with dockside gas close to $4 a gallon. Harry, If you can't afford the gas for 20 hrs of boating in a year, it is time to sell the boat and shoot more beer cans. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 20, 5:43*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
You just explained so many things....much more than you intended to. Like what, Doug? What did I explain that I didn't want to? |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"Tim" wrote in message
... On Jan 20, 5:43 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: You just explained so many things....much more than you intended to. Like what, Doug? What did I explain that I didn't want to? ================ I said "intended", not "wanted". Be a linguist for a minute. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 21, 5:25*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 20, 5:43 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: You just explained so many things....much more than you intended to. Like what, Doug? What did I explain that I didn't want to? ================ I said "intended", not "wanted". Be a linguist for a minute. OK, I'll bit, what did I say that I didn't intend to? trying to start an arguement, or just makeing a comment to belittle me, or something like that? |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
Tim wrote:
On Jan 21, 5:25 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 20, 5:43 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: You just explained so many things....much more than you intended to. Like what, Doug? What did I explain that I didn't want to? ================ I said "intended", not "wanted". Be a linguist for a minute. OK, I'll bit, what did I say that I didn't intend to? trying to start an arguement, or just makeing a comment to belittle me, or something like that? You have way more patience than I do. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:12:55 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Jan 21, 5:25*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 20, 5:43 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: You just explained so many things....much more than you intended to. Like what, Doug? What did I explain that I didn't want to? ================ I said "intended", not "wanted". Be a linguist for a minute. OK, I'll bit, what did I say that I didn't intend to? trying to start an arguement, or just makeing a comment to belittle me, or something like that? It's what Doug does. -- Red Herring |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com