|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"HK" wrote in message ... Canuck57 wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Inflation Rate Is Worst in 17 Years WASHINGTON (AP) -- Higher costs for energy and food last year pushed inflation up by the largest amount in 17 years, even though prices generally remained tame outside of those two areas. Meanwhile, industrial output was flat in December, more evidence of a significant slowdown in the economy. Consumer prices rose by 4.1 percent for all of 2007, up sharply from a 2.5 percent increase in 2006, the Labor Department said Wednesday. Consumers felt the pain when they filled up their gas tanks or shopped for groceries. Prices for both energy and food shot up by the largest amount since 1990. I'm tellin' ya....we should've invaded Saudi Arabia instead of eye-rock, and just taken their damned oil. At least we could've been honest about that mission. Put the whole damned country under new management. Speaking of SA, did you see our fearless leader begging in the Middle East for the Saudis to drill more? If memory serves, oil was around $25 a barrel when President Idiot presumed office in 2001. I was busy getting a stomach ache over the real reason for his visit: To tell them we were happy to sell them more weapons. It's not a matter of *if* we'll regret that at some point in the future, it's a matter of *when*. We have to sell the Saudis the weaponry, else they'll cut back on oil. Why not just pull out. Let some fanatic get power hungry and when Saudi gets it's control of government is threatened let them pay a trillion or two for the services if the USA to intervene? The problem is that there are arms sales whores all over the world, and the purveyors have no interest in breaking the cycle. The Saudis have the bucks and the oil to buy whatever they want from whomever they want. But do they have the guts to go out and fight for their freedom? I suspect raising a trillion would be more their style. I really thought that after the debacle in Vietnam, we might have learned some lessons about proliferating weaponry and warfare. Nah. Agreed. If your going to fight a war, go in, do it then get out. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Inflation Rate Is Worst in 17 Years WASHINGTON (AP) -- Higher costs for energy and food last year pushed inflation up by the largest amount in 17 years, even though prices generally remained tame outside of those two areas. Meanwhile, industrial output was flat in December, more evidence of a significant slowdown in the economy. Consumer prices rose by 4.1 percent for all of 2007, up sharply from a 2.5 percent increase in 2006, the Labor Department said Wednesday. Consumers felt the pain when they filled up their gas tanks or shopped for groceries. Prices for both energy and food shot up by the largest amount since 1990. I'm tellin' ya....we should've invaded Saudi Arabia instead of eye-rock, and just taken their damned oil. At least we could've been honest about that mission. Put the whole damned country under new management. Speaking of SA, did you see our fearless leader begging in the Middle East for the Saudis to drill more? If memory serves, oil was around $25 a barrel when President Idiot presumed office in 2001. I remember the discussion earlier of high oil prices being blamed on the speculators in the trading pits. No fair bringing up last month's talking points. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:39:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: A sword on his shoulder??? Oh no....a re-run of the flight suit on the aircraft carrier pose. He was marching with the slimey Saudis in some sort of procession. You think maybe he was being inducted into the local masonic lodge? He was doing nothing more than following the protocol and tradition of the country he was visiting and in accordance with the cultural advisors that tell him what to do. Any POTUS would be doing the same thing. You guys are too much sometimes. Eisboch Careful, you'll be joining us in Bozo's Bin. -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jan 16, 11:09�am, John H. wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:07:18 -0500, HK wrote: Inflation Rate Is Worst in 17 Years WASHINGTON (AP) -- Higher costs for energy and food last year pushed inflation up by the largest amount in 17 years, even though prices generally remained tame outside of those two areas. Meanwhile, industrial output was flat in December, more evidence of a significant slowdown in the economy. Consumer prices rose by 4.1 percent for all of 2007, up sharply from a 2.5 percent increase in 2006, the Labor Department said Wednesday. Consumers felt the pain when they filled up their gas tanks or shopped for groceries. Prices for both energy and food shot up by the largest amount since 1990. One must wonder, "Where is Chuck?" HEY CHUCK! Isn't this 'political horse ****'? -- John H Yeah. And I'm doing my best not to participate in it, thank you. I slip once in a while, but there's a huge difference between hoping to find some boating related discussion at this site and cranking out one troll-post after another. Wonder what they'd think over on the "libs.r.us" or "bush.for.king" sites if I just started posting a bunch of boating related threads? My bet is that would be just as silly and out of place as all the political trolls are on this boating site. Yeah, yeah. "You can ignore them". That's like trying to ignore the litter after the recycling truck rolls over at the corner. :-) Chuck the amazing thing is that you don't chastise Harry or other lefties when they start spewing political crap. Something about turning a blind eye. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"John H." wrote in message
... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message om... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Inflation Rate Is Worst in 17 Years WASHINGTON (AP) -- Higher costs for energy and food last year pushed inflation up by the largest amount in 17 years, even though prices generally remained tame outside of those two areas. Meanwhile, industrial output was flat in December, more evidence of a significant slowdown in the economy. Consumer prices rose by 4.1 percent for all of 2007, up sharply from a 2.5 percent increase in 2006, the Labor Department said Wednesday. Consumers felt the pain when they filled up their gas tanks or shopped for groceries. Prices for both energy and food shot up by the largest amount since 1990. Actually the opening line was: 'Under Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat controlled Congress' Sorry, Bilious, but the Democrats do not control Congress. They have simple majorities. When you control Congress, you have supermajorities, enough votes in your own party to control legislation and to overturn presidential vetoes. Simple majority seems to work just fine when electing people to office. Why doesn't it work when congress votes? Could it be that there are some democrats who don't want to go in the direction of Pelosi and Reid? Not to worry. Next January, the Democrats will control the White House and increase their simple majorities in Congress. We will see. Unless your write-in campaign for Zell Miller or some other lunatic succeeds. We have 10 months to go before citizens are allowed to vote. What economic policies there are in place now are those of the Bush Administration. And.... Bad news for the GOP. So sad. What is the bad news. The people put the Democrat's in charge of congress and they couldn't get anything done, except changing the menu in the cafeteria. That is going to impress a lot of people. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@giganews. com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"John H." wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@giganews .com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@giganew s.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: A sword on his shoulder??? Oh no....a re-run of the flight suit on the aircraft carrier pose. He was marching with the slimey Saudis in some sort of procession. You think maybe he was being inducted into the local masonic lodge? He was doing nothing more than following the protocol and tradition of the country he was visiting and in accordance with the cultural advisors that tell him what to do. Any POTUS would be doing the same thing. You guys are too much sometimes. Eisboch Sorry, but I cannot envision President Hillary walking hand in hand with the slimey Saudis and carrying a sword on her soldier. Or President Barack. The fact is, Bush is a toady of the Saudis. Look Harry misspelled a word. But, I won't be an asshole and point it out. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Those items are built in a couple of somebody's home districts. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"John H." wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gigane ws.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. |
The Harry and Joe circle jerk continues..
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:34:53 -0800 (PST),
wrote: On Jan 16, 4:32*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "D.Duck" wrote in message ... "Joe" is Doug, a fairly typical upstate New Yorker. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. A re-run of Iraq, huh? Eisboch |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. A re-run of Iraq, huh? Eisboch Sorry. Screwed up the cut. Attribute to John H. is in error. Eisboch |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gigan ews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:12:38 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. A re-run of Iraq, huh? Eisboch Sorry. Screwed up the cut. Attribute to John H. is in error. Eisboch No sweat. -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:32:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
To participate here you need to be unbalanced. Heh. The basic problem on this group is too many northern boaters with nothing to do for 6 months of the year (with apologies to those doing January sea trials in New England). Posted at anchor near Big Pine Key, FL |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:32:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: To participate here you need to be unbalanced. Heh. The basic problem on this group is too many northern boaters with nothing to do for 6 months of the year (with apologies to those doing January sea trials in New England). Posted at anchor near Big Pine Key, FL Perhaps you can wade ashore and pick up a pie at Key West Key Lime Pie. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:05:10 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: The basic problem on this group is too many northern boaters with nothing to do for 6 months of the year Damn Yankees. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
JimH wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:32:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: To participate here you need to be unbalanced. Heh. The basic problem on this group is too many northern boaters with nothing to do for 6 months of the year (with apologies to those doing January sea trials in New England). Posted at anchor near Big Pine Key, FL So it looks like you are getting as far away from home on this trip as you did on the previous trip up north (Spring to Fall). Why the need to get out of Dodge just after getting home? ;-) Threats from neighbors. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 16, 5:32*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... Chuck, just be fair and balanced. That's all. -- John H To participate here you need to be unbalanced. Eisboch Mentally. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 16, 5:49*pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: A sword on his shoulder??? *Oh no....a re-run of the flight suit on the aircraft carrier pose. He was marching with the slimey Saudis in some sort of procession. You think maybe he was being inducted into the local masonic lodge? He was doing nothing more than following the protocol and tradition of the country he was visiting and in accordance with the cultural advisors that tell him what to do. Any POTUS would be doing the same thing. You guys are too much sometimes. Eisboch Sorry, but I cannot envision President Hillary walking hand in hand with the slimey Saudis and carrying a sword on her soldier. Or President Barack. The fact is, Bush is a toady of the Saudis.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No she'd have to have her face hidden |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 16, 5:49*pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: A sword on his shoulder??? *Oh no....a re-run of the flight suit on the aircraft carrier pose. He was marching with the slimey Saudis in some sort of procession. You think maybe he was being inducted into the local masonic lodge? He was doing nothing more than following the protocol and tradition of the country he was visiting and in accordance with the cultural advisors that tell him what to do. Any POTUS would be doing the same thing. You guys are too much sometimes. Eisboch Sorry, but I cannot envision President Hillary walking hand in hand with the slimey Saudis and carrying a sword on her soldier. Or President Barack. The fact is, Bush is a toady of the Saudis.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Was Bubba a "toady" of Israel when he showed up there wearing a Jewish kippah or yarmulke on his head? After all he claims to be a Southern Baptist. http://blog.balder.org/billeder-blog...raeli-Flag.jpg I agree with Richard. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"Eisboch" wrote in message
... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. A re-run of Iraq, huh? Eisboch Actually, I said that. I suggested turning Saudi Arabia into Puerto Rico. We built the country with our money. It's ours. Incinerate every living resident of the country. On television. Line the borders 10 miles deep with land mines every 36 inches. Take their oil Capisce? |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"John H." wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4ax. com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@giga news.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... Not to worry. Next January, the Democrats will control the White House and increase their simple majorities in Congress. Unless your write-in campaign for Zell Miller or some other lunatic succeeds. What economic policies there are in place now are those of the Bush Administration. Bad news for the GOP. So sad. They control congress. They have a majority. They "can". But they don't. Eisboch That is very true. May be why Congress has a lower approval rating than the POTUS. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:01:52 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Jan 16, 5:49*pm, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: A sword on his shoulder??? *Oh no....a re-run of the flight suit on the aircraft carrier pose. He was marching with the slimey Saudis in some sort of procession. You think maybe he was being inducted into the local masonic lodge? He was doing nothing more than following the protocol and tradition of the country he was visiting and in accordance with the cultural advisors that tell him what to do. Any POTUS would be doing the same thing. You guys are too much sometimes. Eisboch Sorry, but I cannot envision President Hillary walking hand in hand with the slimey Saudis and carrying a sword on her soldier. Or President Barack. The fact is, Bush is a toady of the Saudis.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Was Bubba a "toady" of Israel when he showed up there wearing a Jewish kippah or yarmulke on his head? After all he claims to be a Southern Baptist. http://blog.balder.org/billeder-blog...raeli-Flag.jpg I agree with Richard. Well, that's good and all, but the bozo's bin is getting crowded! -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4ax .com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gig anews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
"John H." wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 17, 8:54*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. * You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. *On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
wrote in message
... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember? |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 17, 9:08*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
wrote in message
... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 17, 9:19*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television.. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure, as soon as you answer my questions.. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
wrote in message
... On Jan 17, 9:19 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure, as soon as you answer my questions.. ========================= You want me to explain why we should not sell weapons to our enemies? I will answer the question for you, but first, I need to know what sort of historical foundation of learning you already have. That will determine how I answer the question. So, which books? And, each week, what news sources do you pay very close attention to? Name them all. |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:54:09 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax .com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4 ax.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@g iganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period. They're our allies. You've gone through about three different arguments today, making yourself look the fool. Maybe you should just stop. -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:19:15 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:po6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com... On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title. Change the subject. Another loss. You're batting 1000. -- John H |
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com