Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:13:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message m... "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:11:57 -0000, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:19:48 -0500, Eisboch wrote: Have you ever considered that bin Laden, as an individual, is *not* important. What is important is the world-wide, religiously based uprising against anything or anybody not believing in fundamental Islam. Bin Laden may be a vocal centerpiece and symbol, but he by himself is not that important. If you are saying the jihad will go on without bin Laden, I wouldn't disagree, but that doesn't make bin Laden unimportant. He's more than a symbol. He's the man behind the murder of 3,000 Americans, and the fact that he is still breathing free air says something quite profound about us, doesn't it? Yeah, it says we decided not to invade Pakistan. I agree. The politics and logistics of the "hunt" is very complex. There's always the danger of causing more chaos in the world than that already existing. If GWB acted like the "cowboy" that his critics claim he is, he would have ignored Pakistan's soveriency claims and sent the troops in to capture or kill bin Laden. It may have accomplished a short term goal but would have set off another major crisis. Psssst! Can I tell you a little secret? GWB already ignores the sovereignty of other countries. Please don't say silly things about how we should respect the sovereignty of other countries. If you insist on saying silly things like that, then you need to explain how the invasion of Iraq fits your definition of respecting sovereignty. Iraq was a threat. Pakistan is an ally. Hard to believe you can't see a difference. -- John H |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Democrats behaving like democrats. | General | |||
Go Democrats! | ASA | |||
Don't Know leads the Democrats | ASA | |||
Bad news for Democrats | ASA |