BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

JoeSpareBedroom

"BAR" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:42:11 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message . ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message . ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

Psssst! Can I tell you a little secret? GWB already ignores the
sovereignty of other countries. Please don't say silly things
about how we should respect the sovereignty of other countries. If
you insist on saying silly things like that, then you need to
explain how the invasion of Iraq fits your definition of
respecting sovereignty.

Excuse me. I paid for this computer. I'll say any silly thing I
want.

Eisboch

Really, I need to understand this better. So far, I've interpreted
your words to mean the following:

"We should respect the sovereignty of other nations, except when we
don't feel like it."

Is that it?
I am not certain what Eisboch meant, but I would say you should
definitely respect the sovereignty of your allies, if you want to
keep them your allies. Pakistan's govt. is doing a real balancing
act, supporting the US, and trying to control the Muslim extremist in
their country. It really doesn't seem to be that hard to understand.

Quiet, Reggie. My question was directed as Eisboch. Don't presume to
be able to explain what he meant.
Joe,
Try to read my post again. I said i am not sure, but then told you
what I think.
I didn't ask for your input. The question was addressed to Eisboch.

This is usenet. If you want to specifically address just one person,
you really should take it to email.

Dougie Kanter needs the audience, it is what gets him up in the morning.

You still haven't explained the specific measures you believe have prevented
further attacks here. I know you've got nothing, but at least you could
pretend to have a decent handful of facts.