"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news "WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:09:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"BAR" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
have lost touch with America, read this.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0108/7888.html

Unbelievable.

The Bush legacy includes 9-11, the Katrina aftermath, torture,
secret energy policies, Halliburton, signing statements,
Gonzales,
no WMDs, Blackwater, 4,000 US troops dead, tens of thousands
seriously
wounded or ill, recession, housing meltdown, 40 million without
health
insurance, incredible national debt.

And not one successful attack on the US by Followers of Islam.


Every observer of recent history attributes the lack of attacks to
something
else.

What a stupid statement.


OK - maybe you're right. Why do you think it's a stupid statement?
I've spoken at length to 5 observers. They each attribute the lack of
attacks to a different aspect of our efforts against terrorists.

Why do you think it's a stupid statement?

What/who are observers?


People just like you. Do have an opinion, or are you completely without
any thoughts at all about why we haven't been attacked here since 9/11?

Yes I have an opinion but I surely wouldn't post it here and be
ridiculed by the likes of you.



I promise I won't ridicule you when you post your thoughts on why we
haven't been attacked here since 9/11. Let's do this a step at a time. In
your opinion, is there more than one reason?


Sorry, not getting sucked in to provide entertainment for you.


If you think I'd ridicule your reasons, then your reasons must be worthy of
ridicule. You pretty much said so yourself.

Actually, there are a few reasons we haven't been attacked. Only one of them
is truly worthy of ridicule. We'll discuss this after Bertie chimes in
later.