About Us

Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_]

wrote:
On Jan 14, 6:32 am, HK wrote:
CalifBill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/398dcm
For the pussyboaters.
Trying to cure their defects?
Not in this case. Everyone I have encountered in person on the water or
at the dealer expos or in the actual boater discussion groups has either
not opted for the damned dam (!) or has removed it because it is
unnecessary. Except for one guy, that is. The top of the transom at the
motor cutout already is 25" minimum, and the dam adds about 11" to that.

Two of my last three small boats had "motor well" transoms. The third
was an open 20" transom. If a large stern wave wants to come aboard, it
fills up the well and flows right over it into the cockpit, and then the
issue is getting rid of the water in a hurry. Same if you take a greenie
over the bow. The issue is to get rid of the water, fast. If you have a
a "motor well" transom and only a pair of bitty scuppers to drain the
cockpit, well, you might have an ocean of trouble in your boat.

Typically, when a wave hits the stern, the stern simply rises. Sometimes
you might get a little water aboard. If you do, the scuppers drain it.
That's been my experience for more than 50 years. I rarely boat on small
inland lakes, but if most of my experience was on small, protected
bodies of water, I might be afraid of the ocean, too.

How much ocean fishing do you do, Harry? You're quite a long ways from
the ocean.

Even when he lived next to the ocean, he spent very little time in his boat.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
A Parker for SW Tom	HK	General	7	January 10th 08 01:57 PM
A little more on the Parker 34...	HK	General	15	November 26th 07 02:52 AM
The 51' Parker	Chuck Gould	General	1	August 19th 06 10:06 AM
Battery heresy	Roger Long	Cruising	36	March 18th 05 01:50 PM

Menu

About Us