![]() |
Install or not install...
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:42:01 -0500, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:03:58 -0500, HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:57:37 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: I can understand why people are atheist, agnostic and deists. How do you feel about worshippers of Transcendental Meditative Catholic Buddhist Fundamentalist Evolutionary Space Monkeys? I don't care if they have sex with their monkeys, so long as they don't try to shovel their religious beliefs onto my secular society. No ayatollahs need apply. But you believe that it's perfectly ok to impose your secular beliefs on me correct? But I don't. Got 'cha. And no, I don't. I said I got 'cha - jeeze... :) If you (and I don't mean you) don't want to help a woman friend get an abortion, why...don't. Got it? Ah, but if I were an OB/GYN, as I understand the law via a DIL who is an OB/GYN (and I readily admit that may be state law, not Federal), I'd be required to do that even if it were against my personal religious belief. |
Install or not install...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... These same "folks" are perfectly OK with the honor of seeing our soldiers die while invading the wrong country. Human life is sacred. Horse ****. An unborn child has no control or choice and the decision is made by others based on what *they* think. A volunteer soldier is one by *his/her* choice and understands (or should) the risks and requirements of the job. Eisboch Once a soldier's in the service, he has a choice of going where he's told, or getting in trouble, right? That's not a choice, unless AWOL is considered a good choice. You obviously don't understand the concept of a military. You don't pick and choose your duty and that is clearly understood before you raise your right hand. You are required to obey any "lawful" order. So there's your debate ... is being ordered to Iraq a lawful order or not. If our banana heads in Congress can't determine that, how the hell does a lowly Private decide? Eisboch The soldier joins by choice. The soldier has no legal choice about the mission he might end up with. He could end up spending the whole time in service training for a war that never happens. Or, he could be sent into the wrong mission. At that moment, he is no different from the unborn child. He has no choice. |
Install or not install...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... These same "folks" are perfectly OK with the honor of seeing our soldiers die while invading the wrong country. Human life is sacred. Horse ****. An unborn child has no control or choice and the decision is made by others based on what *they* think. A volunteer soldier is one by *his/her* choice and understands (or should) the risks and requirements of the job. Eisboch Once a soldier's in the service, he has a choice of going where he's told, or getting in trouble, right? That's not a choice, unless AWOL is considered a good choice. You obviously don't understand the concept of a military. You don't pick and choose your duty and that is clearly understood before you raise your right hand. You are required to obey any "lawful" order. So there's your debate ... is being ordered to Iraq a lawful order or not. If our banana heads in Congress can't determine that, how the hell does a lowly Private decide? Eisboch The soldier joins by choice. The soldier has no legal choice about the mission he might end up with. He could end up spending the whole time in service training for a war that never happens. Or, he could be sent into the wrong mission. At that moment, he is no different from the unborn child. He has no choice. Strange logic. A soldier joins by choice fully understanding (theoretically anyway) that he/she will have very limited choices during the duration of his/her service. Military service includes a suspension of many "rights" that a civilian has and military personnel know that going in. An unborn child knows nothing and can't make a choice. Eisboch |
Install or not install...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... These same "folks" are perfectly OK with the honor of seeing our soldiers die while invading the wrong country. Human life is sacred. Horse ****. An unborn child has no control or choice and the decision is made by others based on what *they* think. A volunteer soldier is one by *his/her* choice and understands (or should) the risks and requirements of the job. Eisboch Once a soldier's in the service, he has a choice of going where he's told, or getting in trouble, right? That's not a choice, unless AWOL is considered a good choice. You obviously don't understand the concept of a military. You don't pick and choose your duty and that is clearly understood before you raise your right hand. You are required to obey any "lawful" order. So there's your debate ... is being ordered to Iraq a lawful order or not. If our banana heads in Congress can't determine that, how the hell does a lowly Private decide? Eisboch The soldier joins by choice. The soldier has no legal choice about the mission he might end up with. He could end up spending the whole time in service training for a war that never happens. Or, he could be sent into the wrong mission. At that moment, he is no different from the unborn child. He has no choice. Strange logic. A soldier joins by choice fully understanding (theoretically anyway) that he/she will have very limited choices during the duration of his/her service. Military service includes a suspension of many "rights" that a civilian has and military personnel know that going in. An unborn child knows nothing and can't make a choice. Eisboch Oh well. The analogy makes sense to me. |
Install or not install...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:58:56 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: BAR wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: BAR wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:57:37 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: I can understand why people are atheist, agnostic and deists. How do you feel about worshippers of Transcendental Meditative Catholic Buddhist Fundamentalist Evolutionary Space Monkeys? If you weren't a fundamentalist it might be attractive. I don't understand your response. I am sure it is me, but please explain. I don't believe that the Evolutionary Space Monkeys intended their sacred texts to be literally followed, it is more a guide to enlightenment. That is one school of thought, but I disagree it is a historical document that should be literally followed. Monkeys can't write, therefore there are no documents - historical or otherwise. You are wrong, it has been translated and written.+ + |
Install or not install...
Vic Smith wrote:
People who do a lot of writing often prefer WordPerfect. I prefer notepad. Nedit works for me. |
Install or not install...
"HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:03:58 -0500, HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:57:37 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: I can understand why people are atheist, agnostic and deists. How do you feel about worshippers of Transcendental Meditative Catholic Buddhist Fundamentalist Evolutionary Space Monkeys? I don't care if they have sex with their monkeys, so long as they don't try to shovel their religious beliefs onto my secular society. No ayatollahs need apply. But you believe that it's perfectly ok to impose your secular beliefs on me correct? But I don't. And no, I don't. If you (and I don't mean you) don't want to help a woman friend get an abortion, why...don't. Got it? These same "folks" are perfectly OK with the honor of seeing our soldiers die while invading the wrong country. Human life is sacred. Horse ****. They keep missing the point. *I don't care* what their religious beliefs or practices are, so long as I don't have to hear about them, read about them, deal with them, stumble across them, or see my tax dollars go to pay for any of them. From what I have seen here, one conclusion I can draw is that the less one follows the teachings of Jesus, the more likely one is to proclaim one's Christianity. Maybe some do not want to here about your lobsta boat. But just like those who profess a religious preference, they also have free speech. |
Install or not install...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:36:25 -0800, "Calif Bill" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:58:56 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: BAR wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: BAR wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:57:37 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: I can understand why people are atheist, agnostic and deists. How do you feel about worshippers of Transcendental Meditative Catholic Buddhist Fundamentalist Evolutionary Space Monkeys? If you weren't a fundamentalist it might be attractive. I don't understand your response. I am sure it is me, but please explain. I don't believe that the Evolutionary Space Monkeys intended their sacred texts to be literally followed, it is more a guide to enlightenment. That is one school of thought, but I disagree it is a historical document that should be literally followed. Monkeys can't write, therefore there are no documents - historical or otherwise. But that does not seem right. As an infinite number of monkeys could produce Shakespeare, why not tennents of ESM.s? Those are Transcendental Meditative Catholic Buddhist Fundamentalist Evolutionary Earth Monkeys. Transcendental Meditative Catholic Buddhist Fundamentalist Evolutionary Space Monkeys are telepathic - no need to write. Can't they just hire a professional writer, maybe a part time union flack, to put the info down on paper? They just telepath it into the flacks brain. |
Install or not install...
HK wrote:
But I don't. And no, I don't. If you (and I don't mean you) don't want to help a woman friend get an abortion, why...don't. Got it? Well SWS did he explain it slow enough so you can "get it". Now, if you don't want to help kill my neighbor don't help, but stop your bitching when someone else does help me. Got it? |
Install or not install...
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:55:25 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:46:02 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message You mean the paper stickums or a computer version? If it's on the PC, where can I get it, and what do you use it for? I could use some "reminder" type deal. Putting a string on my finger hurts after a while. --Vic http://www.3m.com/us/office/postit/d...tal_notes.html Thanks! I've installed the trial version. --Vic Please report back about how you like it. I didn't. It's gone. --Vic |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com