"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

That's the beauty of the internet.. Your words are preserved for history
and can come back to bite you. Of course, if you always tell the truth, you
don't have to worry about what might be in the archives. You should try it
sometimes...that is, telling the truth.




"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 10:58:24 -0400, Harry Krause

wrote:

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Chris wrote:

"Jim" is a horse's ass.


And you're a piece of ****.

Make that a lying piece of ****.
In fact, the only time I know for sure you've told the truth is
when
you
admitted to being a socialist.



I don't recall "admitting" to being a socialist, feces-for-brains.
I'm
actually a moderate, yellow-dog Democrat. But I certainly find
very
little wrong with the brand of democratic socialism practiced in
some
northern European nations.


You *did* admit that you're a socialist. You just didn't use the
exact
words "I'm a Socialist". Maybe this will jar your memory:

Do you believe that the income tax system in the United States
should be
used
for redistribution of the wealth?


Harry's answer: "Yup"


And, indeed, our progressive tax system does redistribute wealth.


But awhile ago you defined "Socialism" as the "forced redistribution
of
wealth". Now, you say you support such a system. That makes you a
Socialist. You fit your very own definition!




K-ripes, are you really as simple-minded as you come across here, or is
it an act? I never defined socialism as "forced redistribution of
wealth." The current income tax system in the USA "forces"
redistribution of wealth. Are you claiming the USA is socialist?

Idiots like you should be forced to take an exam before being allowed to
vote. Or speak.

Harry, I hate to say it, 'cause I try to remain neutral, but you've been
'got'
by NYOB!

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


Yeah, sure, John...as if any of you righties individually or
collectively had the ability...




--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.





Oh, Puh-lease...why would you think I give a rat's butt what a fripping
no-name dentist and his gang of right-wing hooligans think about anything?

You're all trash, and gutless trash at that.

That seems to be your only retort when cornered in an debate.

But it is getting old. It is childish. And it only shows you are defeated.

Jim wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

That's the beauty of the internet.. Your words are preserved for history
and can come back to bite you. Of course, if you always tell the truth, you
don't have to worry about what might be in the archives. You should try it
sometimes...that is, telling the truth.




"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 10:58:24 -0400, Harry Krause

wrote:

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Chris wrote:

"Jim" is a horse's ass.


And you're a piece of ****.

Make that a lying piece of ****.
In fact, the only time I know for sure you've told the truth is
when
you
admitted to being a socialist.



I don't recall "admitting" to being a socialist, feces-for-brains.
I'm
actually a moderate, yellow-dog Democrat. But I certainly find
very
little wrong with the brand of democratic socialism practiced in
some
northern European nations.


You *did* admit that you're a socialist. You just didn't use the
exact
words "I'm a Socialist". Maybe this will jar your memory:

Do you believe that the income tax system in the United States
should be
used
for redistribution of the wealth?


Harry's answer: "Yup"


And, indeed, our progressive tax system does redistribute wealth.


But awhile ago you defined "Socialism" as the "forced redistribution
of
wealth". Now, you say you support such a system. That makes you a
Socialist. You fit your very own definition!




K-ripes, are you really as simple-minded as you come across here, or is
it an act? I never defined socialism as "forced redistribution of
wealth." The current income tax system in the USA "forces"
redistribution of wealth. Are you claiming the USA is socialist?

Idiots like you should be forced to take an exam before being allowed to
vote. Or speak.

Harry, I hate to say it, 'cause I try to remain neutral, but you've been
'got'
by NYOB!

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


Yeah, sure, John...as if any of you righties individually or
collectively had the ability...




--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.





Oh, Puh-lease...why would you think I give a rat's butt what a fripping
no-name dentist and his gang of right-wing hooligans think about anything?

You're all trash, and gutless trash at that.

That seems to be your only retort when cornered in an debate.

But it is getting old. It is childish. And it only shows you are defeated.


Naw, it simply shows I don't give a crap what you gutless wonders think
about anything, and that your "points" aren't worth a reasoned response.
You are mostly talking to each other, like the dittoheads you are. Only
one or two of you even have the cojones to use your real names. NOYB is
scared crapless that he might be outed.


--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:00:33 GMT, "Jim"
wrote:

That seems to be your only retort when cornered in an debate.

I seem to recall most others bringing something to the debate, other
than you, Jim. Your sole purpose here seems to be personally
attacking anyone you don't agree with. Do you have a position on
anything?

bb

bb wrote:

On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:00:33 GMT, "Jim"
wrote:

That seems to be your only retort when cornered in an debate.

I seem to recall most others bringing something to the debate, other
than you, Jim. Your sole purpose here seems to be personally
attacking anyone you don't agree with. Do you have a position on
anything?

bb


His position is " so he can hide behind his
skirts.

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.