Actually, Harry, I credit the tax cut for a very recent increase in
patients' disposable income...leading to a sharp increase in spending on
dental care vs. last summer. The increase in productivity is the reason I
needed to expand my staff.
As for me supplying my name and phone number, here are my terms:
1) I get at least 3 paragraphs of space in your article to share my views
(in full, and unedited of course)
2) I get a chance to review the entire article, and *OK* any portion dealing
with me and my practice, prior to publication
3) You contact the Collier County Dental Association with a synopsis about
the theme of your article, and they'll pass it along to me. The contact
should be made on official letterhead of the organization that will do the
publishing, and should be signed by you. This would mean you are who you say
you are and you're acting in good faith.
Sound fair?
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
bb wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 17:58:42 -0400, JohnH
wrote:
The fact that redistribution occurs now doesn't mean
it's not a socialist concept. If you, and other socialists, had your
way
the
redistribution would approach equality across the board.
Isn't the distribution of wealth going the other way, fast? I think
we've got a situation where a larger percentage of the wealth is
getting concentrated into fewer and fewer individuals.
bb
Indeed it is.
BTW, I'm helping in a survey to find any manufacturing or service
companies around the nation that have done any significant amounts of
recent entry-level hiring at decent wages (at least twice minimum wage)
that can be directly related to Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy.
I have a service company and I recently increased the number of
employees by
more than 30%. The average pay for the new hires is $14. Why don't you
interview me?
Sure, Supply me with your name and phone number, and documentation that
you were able to increase your work force by one because of the Bush tax
cut.
--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.