Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
Find a real boating forum. This NG is a joke and nothing more than cheap
entertainment. Harry, Gould, bb, jps, Jim Dandy, ignoramus and the group have turned this into nothing more than a political chat room full of childish name calling and intolerance for opposing opinions. Don't blame me for what it is now. I came on board when the NG was already screwed up thanks to the members I mentioned above. I only joined in the fun. Email me if you want some serious boating forums. "noah" wrote in message ... When I first found rec.boats, I was thrilled (it doesn't take much anymore) at the idea of "fellow boaters" to talk with. Soon after, after wading through the political and personal bashing, I mentioned this in the group, and was told (about 3:1), to "get used to it". I have. I have researched the rec.boats Charter and,basically, the founders never anticipated that the group would be used for anything *but* boating posts, therefore did not include any language concerning OT posts. C'est dommage. I admit to joining the OT posts now and then. It's like a "free brunch". How can you resist? ) Sometimes, they are interesting. As regular posters to this group, would you support an amendment to the FAQ requiring that the letters "OT" precede any off-topic post? This would not limit any discussion, but would enable the boating purists to filter the background noise. The political warriors would remain free to eviscerate each other. As it stands, some do, some don't, "OT". Some posters have left the group, or have become "lurkers", because they are annoyed and frustrated with the OT postings. Perhaps a compromise is appropriate? I can appreciate the idea that rec.boats is like "the bar at the yacht club". I can also understand the plight of the weekend boater who comes here looking for boating info, and finds reps and dems ripping each others viscerals out. Viscerals are good, especially with garlic and wine sauce, but this isn't a cooking newsgroup. Is it worth the minimal effort to try to resolve these differences? I think so, but then again, I married my ex-wife. My judgement is suspect. I would appreciate the comments of the entire group on this issue. Regards, noah |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 02:31:04 GMT, "Jim"
wrote: Find a real boating forum. This NG is a joke and nothing more than cheap entertainment. I often find good advice in this group. But then, I own six boats, and read the on-topic posts. Harry, Gould, bb, jps, Jim Dandy, ignoramus and the group have turned this into nothing more than a political chat room full of childish name calling and intolerance for opposing opinions. ....and you had no part? Don't blame me for what it is now. I came on board when the NG was already screwed up thanks to the members I mentioned above. I only joined in the fun. OK. I won't blame you. Mom wasn't looking anyway. You could, however, improve it. Email me if you want some serious boating forums. Sounds like you're more interested in wrecked.boats than rec.boats. To each his own. Thanks for the response. noah "noah" wrote in message .. . When I first found rec.boats, I was thrilled (it doesn't take much anymore) at the idea of "fellow boaters" to talk with. Soon after, after wading through the political and personal bashing, I mentioned this in the group, and was told (about 3:1), to "get used to it". I have. I have researched the rec.boats Charter and,basically, the founders never anticipated that the group would be used for anything *but* boating posts, therefore did not include any language concerning OT posts. C'est dommage. I admit to joining the OT posts now and then. It's like a "free brunch". How can you resist? ) Sometimes, they are interesting. As regular posters to this group, would you support an amendment to the FAQ requiring that the letters "OT" precede any off-topic post? This would not limit any discussion, but would enable the boating purists to filter the background noise. The political warriors would remain free to eviscerate each other. As it stands, some do, some don't, "OT". Some posters have left the group, or have become "lurkers", because they are annoyed and frustrated with the OT postings. Perhaps a compromise is appropriate? I can appreciate the idea that rec.boats is like "the bar at the yacht club". I can also understand the plight of the weekend boater who comes here looking for boating info, and finds reps and dems ripping each others viscerals out. Viscerals are good, especially with garlic and wine sauce, but this isn't a cooking newsgroup. Is it worth the minimal effort to try to resolve these differences? I think so, but then again, I married my ex-wife. My judgement is suspect. I would appreciate the comments of the entire group on this issue. Regards, noah |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 02:31:04 GMT, "Jim"
wrote: Harry, Gould, bb, jps, Jim Dandy, ignoramus and the group have turned this into nothing more than a political chat room full of childish name calling and intolerance for opposing opinions. So the problem in this group, according you, is clearly caused by those who happen to be left of center, and those right of center don't contribute to the problem? Interesting you would be accusing others of intolerance. bb |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 14:15:54 -0400, "Paul Schilter"
paulschilter@comcast,dot,net wrote: I think the OT designation is a good idea, I just find it ironic that you didn't in this post. You don't think a post about rec.boats, in rec.boats, is on topic? bb |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
bb,
I guess it's how you want to define it. Some think all posts should be strictly about boats or boating, some don't. I don't think you could over use the OT designation. Guess I just figured that noah bringing up the subject would use the OT designation, either way not a big deal. Paul "bb" wrote in message ... On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 14:15:54 -0400, "Paul Schilter" paulschilter@comcast,dot,net wrote: I think the OT designation is a good idea, I just find it ironic that you didn't in this post. You don't think a post about rec.boats, in rec.boats, is on topic? bb |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
You are absolutely correct! (Good eye though!)
John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD The only criteria one must meet to have rights exterminated by the government is to be labeled as a "terrorist" by the Executive Branch. We should deny rights to convicted criminals, not foster the potential for persecution of the political adversaries of the sitting administration. You conservatives will be on the outside looking in again, someday. When you are, I hope to see all of your basic rights and freedoms protected. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 16:34:14 -0400, "Paul Schilter"
paulschilter@comcast,dot,net wrote: bb, I guess it's how you want to define it. Some think all posts should be strictly about boats or boating, some don't. I don't think you could over use the OT designation. Guess I just figured that noah bringing up the subject would use the OT designation, either way not a big deal. Paul "bb" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 14:15:54 -0400, "Paul Schilter" paulschilter@comcast,dot,net wrote: I think the OT designation is a good idea, I just find it ironic that you didn't in this post. You don't think a post about rec.boats, in rec.boats, is on topic? bb Paul, I appreciate the response. Maybe I'm hard-headed, but the group name is rec.boats. When the political acrimony and personal insults outweigh the boating responses, it's time to have a martini and chill. I like martinis. I like boats. It's a shame we don't have rec.boats.martinis. noah |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
Subject: Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 02:31:04 GMT, "Jim" wrote: Harry, Gould, bb, jps, Jim Dandy, ignoramus and the group have turned this into nothing more than a political chat room full of childish name calling and intolerance for opposing opinions. Another typical newsgroup whiner. Capt. Bill |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
LaBomba182 wrote:
Subject: Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 02:31:04 GMT, "Jim" wrote: Harry, Gould, bb, jps, Jim Dandy, ignoramus and the group have turned this into nothing more than a political chat room full of childish name calling and intolerance for opposing opinions. Another typical newsgroup whiner. Capt. Bill "Jim" is a horse's ass. -- * * * email sent to will *never* get to me. |