|
Spam Filter Help Reqd
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
... On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:51:45 GMT, JoeSpareBedroom penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:03:22 GMT, JoeSpareBedroom penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Accidental deletion of what? Email messages? Yes, although The Bat! has an available NNTP add-on, it just isn't a news reader and I wouldn't recommend it as such.... Mail... for example, you can set the program to automatically delete all mail over X days old, but the parked messages will not be deleted. Messages can be parked and unparked manually or automatically, based on highly configurable filters. If I delete email from OE's inbox, it lands in the Deleted folder. Now, there are two ways that folder can be emptied: 1) I set the "Delete on exit" option to do its thing. This can't be done by accident unless you're blind or illiterate. 2) I use 3 specific keystrokes to do it manually. If this happens, it's because I wanted it to happen. Neither is the fault of the program. Give you an example.... Instead of fighting with one inbox.... if you sent me an email it would put the message into the folder "Personal Correspondence" and sub-folder JoeSpareBedroom. I have the option of making sure I save the item... say the word "boat" is there. I could park the message, optionally play a sound, and/or change the color or font. If you sent it to my public boating email address, it would be saved under that personna.... perhaps based on previous conditions it could be archived in another personna. Outlook Express can do all this, except (AFAIK) customizing sound for certain emails. It might even post itself to my calendar for future action. Or certain information found in header or body might cause the previously parked message to become of lesser importance and become unparked.... or subject to automatic deletion at the next purge cycle. OE can't do this, because it's not designed for scheduling. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
Get a real news reader and dump Outlook Express for news. In fact,
you'd be well served to dump Outlook and/or Outlook Express even for mail. No problems with OE here... been using it for years. Filters are easy. --Mike "HK" wrote in message ... Gene Kearns wrote: On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:17:29 GMT, Mike Harrison penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Can anyone help me block these MI5 messages. I've tried using M***5 as a subject line filter in Outlook Express (filtering the root newsgroup directory), but it doesn't do the job. Get a real news reader and dump Outlook Express for news. In fact, you'd be well served to dump Outlook and/or Outlook Express even for mail. In fact, house of you out there using Google Groups should make a new year's resolution to start using a standards compliant news reader..... It's hard to dump Outlook if the company you work for is large and has it integrated into its IT functions and services. But not using Outlook Express is the way to go. It's just awful. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
Just type "outlook express problems" into your web browser and have fun.
Most people only post when they have problems... rarely when things are just fine. I'm very confident there are far more folks in the latter group, than the former... --Mike "HK" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:25:46 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:17:10 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: That's like saying a vacuum cleaner does a lousy job of toasting bagels, so you're going to shop for a better vacuum cleaner. I don't know about you, but I toast my bagels on the muffler of my lawn tractor. Or at this time of year, my big snow blower. Yeah, but that makes perfect sense. Not a vacuum cleaner, though. Why not? There is heat generated by the motor - seems to me to be a pretty simple adaptation. There was a paperback published some years ago that certainly would interest Tom if not others. It was a book of roadkill recipes. These were recipes you could use to heat up on the radiator of your car while you are driving. Now, there are other roadkill recipes around, but these were for meals you could prepare while you travel. On your car engine. Yeah anyway...back to the subject. Why is Outlook Express awful? Just type "outlook express problems" into your web browser and have fun. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
I thought you sang hymans.... :-
--Mike "CalifBill" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:25:46 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:17:10 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: That's like saying a vacuum cleaner does a lousy job of toasting bagels, so you're going to shop for a better vacuum cleaner. I don't know about you, but I toast my bagels on the muffler of my lawn tractor. Or at this time of year, my big snow blower. Yeah, but that makes perfect sense. Not a vacuum cleaner, though. Why not? There is heat generated by the motor - seems to me to be a pretty simple adaptation. There was a paperback published some years ago that certainly would interest Tom if not others. It was a book of roadkill recipes. These were recipes you could use to heat up on the radiator of your car while you are driving. Now, there are other roadkill recipes around, but these were for meals you could prepare while you travel. On your car engine. Yeah anyway...back to the subject. Why is Outlook Express awful? Just type "outlook express problems" into your web browser and have fun. I haven't had a single problem with OE since I began using it several years ago for email & news. I want to know what YOU have PERSONALLY WITNESSED. I personally witnessed Jesus restoring the hymens of prostitutes at The Fuzzy Bunny Ranch out in Nevada. Most of us do not frequent Houses of Ill Repute, so most here will miss that experience of healing hymans. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:09:53 -0800, "Mike" wrote:
No problems with OE here... been using it for years. Filters are easy. I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. Also, a lot of the better .mp3, mp4 files have been compressed using other than those recognised by MS. I tried a few newsreaders, but settled on Forte' Agent. I've gotten used to it, but it does have some strange "quirks". |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part
binaries very well. I generally don't use it for that, but when I have, it's worked ok. I guess what I mean is that I get mp3s and whatnot, from other sources, not usenet. I will admit though, that it aint perfect, but then again, nothing is... except for Harry of course. :-? --Mike "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:09:53 -0800, "Mike" wrote: No problems with OE here... been using it for years. Filters are easy. I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. Also, a lot of the better .mp3, mp4 files have been compressed using other than those recognised by MS. I tried a few newsreaders, but settled on Forte' Agent. I've gotten used to it, but it does have some strange "quirks". |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
Mike wrote:
I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. I generally don't use it for that, but when I have, it's worked ok. I guess what I mean is that I get mp3s and whatnot, from other sources, not usenet. I will admit though, that it aint perfect, but then again, nothing is... except for Harry of course. :-? --Mike I don't bother with multi-part binaries. I don't see the point. I download MP4s from Russia (with Love), and any movies I might want are available from various sites in *.RAR file format. Same with MP3's. The problem with usenet music binaries is that you never really know what the hell you are getting, quality-wise. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
|
Spam Filter Help Reqd
WaIIy wrote: On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:17:29 GMT, "Mike Harrison" wrote: Can anyone help me block these MI5 messages. I've tried using M***5 as a subject line filter in Outlook Express (filtering the root newsgroup directory), but it doesn't do the job. You really can't, he's too changeable. I couldn't wade through all this thread, but I did try to set up a filter in Mozilla and Firefox. I couldn't get it to work, mainly because I couldn't get the wildcard feature to kick in. I need a filter that looks for "M", "I", and "5" in succession but not necessarily adjacent. Maybe this was already covered? |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
Mike wrote:
Just type "outlook express problems" into your web browser and have fun. Most people only post when they have problems... rarely when things are just fine. I'm very confident there are far more folks in the latter group, than the former... --Mike Type in "Vista Problems" and see what pops up. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
HK wrote:
Mike wrote: I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. I generally don't use it for that, but when I have, it's worked ok. I guess what I mean is that I get mp3s and whatnot, from other sources, not usenet. I will admit though, that it aint perfect, but then again, nothing is... except for Harry of course. :-? --Mike I don't bother with multi-part binaries. I don't see the point. I download MP4s from Russia (with Love), and any movies I might want are available from various sites in *.RAR file format. Same with MP3's. You do know you are stealing intellectual property when you download from those Russian sites. They DO NOT PAY royalties and have been the bane of MPAA who are trying to close down these sites. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 02:03:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:09:53 -0800, "Mike" wrote: No problems with OE here... been using it for years. Filters are easy. I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. Also, a lot of the better .mp3, mp4 files have been compressed using other than those recognised by MS. I tried a few newsreaders, but settled on Forte' Agent. I've gotten used to it, but it does have some strange "quirks". I tried a new version a year or two ago and didn't like it. Too many features. I'm back to 1.91, and have no problems with it. It works well, as a newsreader. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:09:32 -0500, HK wrote:
Mike wrote: I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. I generally don't use it for that, but when I have, it's worked ok. I guess what I mean is that I get mp3s and whatnot, from other sources, not usenet. I will admit though, that it aint perfect, but then again, nothing is... except for Harry of course. :-? I don't bother with multi-part binaries. I don't see the point. I download MP4s from Russia (with Love), and any movies I might want are available from various sites in *.RAR file format. Same with MP3's. Right - I'm going to give a Russian mob a valid credit card number. Not to mention that these are non-royalty paying sites and are essentially pirating the music and movies. Which I would think should be a problem for you being a professional writer and such. The problem with usenet music binaries is that you never really know what the hell you are getting, quality-wise. The better groups all use the higher compression. The stuff I download is mostly experimental/trance/ambient stuff that has never seen a recording studio. Most of it is junk - some of it is quite good. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 02:03:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:09:53 -0800, "Mike" wrote: No problems with OE here... been using it for years. Filters are easy. I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. Also, a lot of the better .mp3, mp4 files have been compressed using other than those recognised by MS. I tried a few newsreaders, but settled on Forte' Agent. I've gotten used to it, but it does have some strange "quirks". If you are into binaries try this one..... http://www.newsrover.com/ -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 071226-0, 12/26/2007 Tested on: 12/26/2007 9:41:30 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com I've used NewsRover for several years and also find it quite capable. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
"HK" wrote in message ... Mike wrote: I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. I generally don't use it for that, but when I have, it's worked ok. I guess what I mean is that I get mp3s and whatnot, from other sources, not usenet. I will admit though, that it aint perfect, but then again, nothing is... except for Harry of course. :-? --Mike I don't bother with multi-part binaries. I don't see the point. I download MP4s from Russia (with Love), and any movies I might want are available from various sites in *.RAR file format. Same with MP3's. The problem with usenet music binaries is that you never really know what the hell you are getting, quality-wise. MP3, MP4, JPEG, etc compress very little using any compression technique. That applies to YENC, RAR, TAR, ZIP, etc. So unless you use the various compressors to break a large file into parts (multi-part files), there is no good reason to use one. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:21:23 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Mike wrote: I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. I generally don't use it for that, but when I have, it's worked ok. I guess what I mean is that I get mp3s and whatnot, from other sources, not usenet. I will admit though, that it aint perfect, but then again, nothing is... except for Harry of course. :-? --Mike I don't bother with multi-part binaries. I don't see the point. I download MP4s from Russia (with Love), and any movies I might want are available from various sites in *.RAR file format. Same with MP3's. The problem with usenet music binaries is that you never really know what the hell you are getting, quality-wise. MP3, MP4, JPEG, etc compress very little using any compression technique. That applies to YENC, RAR, TAR, ZIP, etc. So unless you use the various compressors to break a large file into parts (multi-part files), there is no good reason to use one. True enough, but with files using the large sample rates - say CD quality sample rates of 44.1 KHz at 16 bits - the various compressors are handy to break up the one file into smaller files for uploading to the servers. I think that figures to like 85 kB/s - did it in my head - double that for stereo. Is that right? Doesn't sound right. Anyway... |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Mike wrote: I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. I generally don't use it for that, but when I have, it's worked ok. I guess what I mean is that I get mp3s and whatnot, from other sources, not usenet. I will admit though, that it aint perfect, but then again, nothing is... except for Harry of course. :-? --Mike I don't bother with multi-part binaries. I don't see the point. I download MP4s from Russia (with Love), and any movies I might want are available from various sites in *.RAR file format. Same with MP3's. The problem with usenet music binaries is that you never really know what the hell you are getting, quality-wise. MP3, MP4, JPEG, etc compress very little using any compression technique. That applies to YENC, RAR, TAR, ZIP, etc. So unless you use the various compressors to break a large file into parts (multi-part files), there is no good reason to use one. I agree. I think "multi-part files" are a pain in the ass. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:09:32 -0500, HK wrote: Mike wrote: I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. I generally don't use it for that, but when I have, it's worked ok. I guess what I mean is that I get mp3s and whatnot, from other sources, not usenet. I will admit though, that it aint perfect, but then again, nothing is... except for Harry of course. :-? I don't bother with multi-part binaries. I don't see the point. I download MP4s from Russia (with Love), and any movies I might want are available from various sites in *.RAR file format. Same with MP3's. Right - I'm going to give a Russian mob a valid credit card number. Not to mention that these are non-royalty paying sites and are essentially pirating the music and movies. Which I would think should be a problem for you being a professional writer and such. The problem with usenet music binaries is that you never really know what the hell you are getting, quality-wise. The better groups all use the higher compression. The stuff I download is mostly experimental/trance/ambient stuff that has never seen a recording studio. Most of it is junk - some of it is quite good. Okay. One of the sites I visit has acres of "trance" music. What the hell is it? |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:48:03 -0500, HK wrote:
Okay. One of the sites I visit has acres of "trance" music. What the hell is it? You wouldn't like it. Don't bother. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:48:03 -0500, HK wrote: Okay. One of the sites I visit has acres of "trance" music. What the hell is it? You wouldn't like it. Don't bother. Well, that's helpful. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:31 -0500, HK wrote:
D.Duck wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Mike wrote: I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. I generally don't use it for that, but when I have, it's worked ok. I guess what I mean is that I get mp3s and whatnot, from other sources, not usenet. I will admit though, that it aint perfect, but then again, nothing is... except for Harry of course. :-? --Mike I don't bother with multi-part binaries. I don't see the point. I download MP4s from Russia (with Love), and any movies I might want are available from various sites in *.RAR file format. Same with MP3's. The problem with usenet music binaries is that you never really know what the hell you are getting, quality-wise. MP3, MP4, JPEG, etc compress very little using any compression technique. That applies to YENC, RAR, TAR, ZIP, etc. So unless you use the various compressors to break a large file into parts (multi-part files), there is no good reason to use one. I agree. I think "multi-part files" are a pain in the ass. That's because you're using software which wasn't designed to handle them. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:09:32 -0500, HK wrote: Mike wrote: I used it for a long time, but found it didn't handle multi-part binaries very well. I generally don't use it for that, but when I have, it's worked ok. I guess what I mean is that I get mp3s and whatnot, from other sources, not usenet. I will admit though, that it aint perfect, but then again, nothing is... except for Harry of course. :-? I don't bother with multi-part binaries. I don't see the point. I download MP4s from Russia (with Love), and any movies I might want are available from various sites in *.RAR file format. Same with MP3's. Right - I'm going to give a Russian mob a valid credit card number. Not to mention that these are non-royalty paying sites and are essentially pirating the music and movies. Which I would think should be a problem for you being a professional writer and such. I wonder what the Russian Mob could do with a credit card with a $20,000 credit limit. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
"HK" wrote in message ... I agree. I think "multi-part files" are a pain in the ass. One advantage of using multi-part files is that you can sample the music for quality without having to download the whole song file. I occasionally check the binary music newsgroups mainly for acoustical music or unusual recordings that you don't find everywhere. I simply download the first one or two sections of the multi-part file, then open them and listen to the first 10-15 seconds of the music. It only takes a couple of seconds to do. If it sounds promising and is of decent quality, I'll go back and highlight all the files and get the whole recording. BTW ... there's a few little tricks I've stumbled across that makes downloading multi-part files fast and easy using OE. For example, it you click and highlight the first file, the scroll down to the last one, hit "Shift" and click on it at the same time, it highlights all the multi-part files associated with the particular song. Then right click, click on "Combine and decode" and it automatically downloads and combines the song files. When I first discovered multi-part files I was clicking away on each section which was a pain. Doing it as described above can't be much easier or faster. Often I'll find two or three songs that I like and download them all at once while I use the browser for something else. Eisboch |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... The problem with usenet music binaries is that you never really know what the hell you are getting, quality-wise. The better groups all use the higher compression. The stuff I download is mostly experimental/trance/ambient stuff that has never seen a recording studio. Most of it is junk - some of it is quite good. I've got one that I downloaded quite a while ago. I think I mentioned it before .... Sousa's "Stars and Stripes". It's an excellent performance and was done at a very high bit rate. It sounds better than many of my CD's or music DVD's on the Martin-Logan's. You can clearly hear every instrument in the band. Eisboch |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... I agree. I think "multi-part files" are a pain in the ass. One advantage of using multi-part files is that you can sample the music for quality without having to download the whole song file. I occasionally check the binary music newsgroups mainly for acoustical music or unusual recordings that you don't find everywhere. Whatever floats. I mostly d/l music I want. I have three different cast versions of La Traviata, for example, all "MP4" quality, and I got them in about 15 minutes from the same site. One of the Russian sites I frequent has a huge backlist of "classicial" CDs, and another is up to date on popular music. I also get music from the Rapidshare servers. It's all top-drawer sound quality, no muss, no fuss. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:18:17 -0500, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I agree. I think "multi-part files" are a pain in the ass. One advantage of using multi-part files is that you can sample the music for quality without having to download the whole song file. I occasionally check the binary music newsgroups mainly for acoustical music or unusual recordings that you don't find everywhere. Whatever floats. I mostly d/l music I want. That's a lot smarter than mostly downloading music you *don't* want. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
"HK" wrote in message
... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I agree. I think "multi-part files" are a pain in the ass. One advantage of using multi-part files is that you can sample the music for quality without having to download the whole song file. I occasionally check the binary music newsgroups mainly for acoustical music or unusual recordings that you don't find everywhere. Whatever floats. I mostly d/l music I want. I have three different cast versions of La Traviata, for example, all "MP4" quality, and I got them in about 15 minutes from the same site. One of the Russian sites I frequent has a huge backlist of "classicial" CDs, and another is up to date on popular music. I also get music from the Rapidshare servers. It's all top-drawer sound quality, no muss, no fuss. mp3sparks.com? What's the other one? |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I agree. I think "multi-part files" are a pain in the ass. One advantage of using multi-part files is that you can sample the music for quality without having to download the whole song file. I occasionally check the binary music newsgroups mainly for acoustical music or unusual recordings that you don't find everywhere. Whatever floats. I mostly d/l music I want. I have three different cast versions of La Traviata, for example, all "MP4" quality, and I got them in about 15 minutes from the same site. One of the Russian sites I frequent has a huge backlist of "classicial" CDs, and another is up to date on popular music. I also get music from the Rapidshare servers. It's all top-drawer sound quality, no muss, no fuss. mp3sparks.com? What's the other one? Is that a working email you show here? Never heard of mp3sparks before, looks interesting for a 102kbps site, though its prices are a bit high. Did see an old Richter piano performance from 1951 right on the front page of the classical page, though, which impressed me. He did a performance of Pictures at an Exhibition in Moscow many years ago that to this day is the best ever recorded, audience coughs and all. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
"HK" wrote in message
. .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I agree. I think "multi-part files" are a pain in the ass. One advantage of using multi-part files is that you can sample the music for quality without having to download the whole song file. I occasionally check the binary music newsgroups mainly for acoustical music or unusual recordings that you don't find everywhere. Whatever floats. I mostly d/l music I want. I have three different cast versions of La Traviata, for example, all "MP4" quality, and I got them in about 15 minutes from the same site. One of the Russian sites I frequent has a huge backlist of "classicial" CDs, and another is up to date on popular music. I also get music from the Rapidshare servers. It's all top-drawer sound quality, no muss, no fuss. mp3sparks.com? What's the other one? Is that a working email you show here? Yes, the email works, although I only check it if I know something legit is on the way. Or, if I'm in the mood for unique opportunities in the Nigerian banking industry. Never heard of mp3sparks before, looks interesting for a 102kbps site, though its prices are a bit high. I think it's hosted on an old 286, or maybe a Casio calculator. So, take into account the time zone in Russia. When kids get home from school, until bedtime, it can be really slow. Avoid that time slot. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"HK" wrote in message Is that a working email you show here? Yes, the email works, although I only check it if I know something legit is on the way. Or, if I'm in the mood for unique opportunities in the Nigerian banking industry. I just sent you an email to two "old" email addresses I had for you. Let me know if you get the message. H. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
"HK" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message Is that a working email you show here? Yes, the email works, although I only check it if I know something legit is on the way. Or, if I'm in the mood for unique opportunities in the Nigerian banking industry. I just sent you an email to two "old" email addresses I had for you. Let me know if you get the message. H. Got it. Now, if I could just stop the phone from ringing, I could read what you sent...these customers don't understand that they're interrupting life. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message Is that a working email you show here? Yes, the email works, although I only check it if I know something legit is on the way. Or, if I'm in the mood for unique opportunities in the Nigerian banking industry. I just sent you an email to two "old" email addresses I had for you. Let me know if you get the message. H. Got it. Now, if I could just stop the phone from ringing, I could read what you sent...these customers don't understand that they're interrupting life. let me know if you need help with setting up the "rapid" stuff. It's directions were written by someone from Karachi who moved to Bangladore. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
"HK" wrote in message
. .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message Is that a working email you show here? Yes, the email works, although I only check it if I know something legit is on the way. Or, if I'm in the mood for unique opportunities in the Nigerian banking industry. I just sent you an email to two "old" email addresses I had for you. Let me know if you get the message. H. Got it. Now, if I could just stop the phone from ringing, I could read what you sent...these customers don't understand that they're interrupting life. let me know if you need help with setting up the "rapid" stuff. It's directions were written by someone from Karachi who moved to Bangladore. If I can decipher Bush, I can decipher anything. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I agree. I think "multi-part files" are a pain in the ass. One advantage of using multi-part files is that you can sample the music for quality without having to download the whole song file. I occasionally check the binary music newsgroups mainly for acoustical music or unusual recordings that you don't find everywhere. Whatever floats. I mostly d/l music I want. I have three different cast versions of La Traviata, for example, all "MP4" quality, and I got them in about 15 minutes from the same site. One of the Russian sites I frequent has a huge backlist of "classicial" CDs, and another is up to date on popular music. I also get music from the Rapidshare servers. It's all top-drawer sound quality, no muss, no fuss. Harry, Whatever happened to you placing a value on intellectual property? |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 12:30:03 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
[email protected] wrote: HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I agree. I think "multi-part files" are a pain in the ass. One advantage of using multi-part files is that you can sample the music for quality without having to download the whole song file. I occasionally check the binary music newsgroups mainly for acoustical music or unusual recordings that you don't find everywhere. Whatever floats. I mostly d/l music I want. I have three different cast versions of La Traviata, for example, all "MP4" quality, and I got them in about 15 minutes from the same site. One of the Russian sites I frequent has a huge backlist of "classicial" CDs, and another is up to date on popular music. I also get music from the Rapidshare servers. It's all top-drawer sound quality, no muss, no fuss. Harry, Whatever happened to you placing a value on intellectual property? Same thing that happened to his anti-handgun stance. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 12:30:03 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" [email protected] wrote: HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I agree. I think "multi-part files" are a pain in the ass. One advantage of using multi-part files is that you can sample the music for quality without having to download the whole song file. I occasionally check the binary music newsgroups mainly for acoustical music or unusual recordings that you don't find everywhere. Whatever floats. I mostly d/l music I want. I have three different cast versions of La Traviata, for example, all "MP4" quality, and I got them in about 15 minutes from the same site. One of the Russian sites I frequent has a huge backlist of "classicial" CDs, and another is up to date on popular music. I also get music from the Rapidshare servers. It's all top-drawer sound quality, no muss, no fuss. Harry, Whatever happened to you placing a value on intellectual property? Same thing that happened to his anti-handgun stance. and his anti-Walmart stance. Actually he still doesn't want anyone else to shop at WalMart and he only buys from them when they have a good deal. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:02:22 -0500, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:48:03 -0500, HK wrote: Okay. One of the sites I visit has acres of "trance" music. What the hell is it? You wouldn't like it. Don't bother. Well, that's helpful. Well, I just don't think you will like it - not your thing. However, trance a type of heavily synthesized/sampled dance music - some is vocal -most of it high tempo, but some slow tempo is included in the genre. Try some and see - if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
... On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:02:22 -0500, HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:48:03 -0500, HK wrote: Okay. One of the sites I visit has acres of "trance" music. What the hell is it? You wouldn't like it. Don't bother. Well, that's helpful. Well, I just don't think you will like it - not your thing. However, trance a type of heavily synthesized/sampled dance music - some is vocal -most of it high tempo, but some slow tempo is included in the genre. Try some and see - if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. What if you're NOT wrong? |
Spam Filter Help Reqd
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:02:22 -0500, HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:48:03 -0500, HK wrote: Okay. One of the sites I visit has acres of "trance" music. What the hell is it? You wouldn't like it. Don't bother. Well, that's helpful. Well, I just don't think you will like it - not your thing. However, trance a type of heavily synthesized/sampled dance music - some is vocal -most of it high tempo, but some slow tempo is included in the genre. Try some and see - if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. You're not wrong. It's sorta like elevator music, though less honest. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com