About Us

BAR

Jim wrote:

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
Jim wrote:

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
HK wrote:
wrote:

But you don't know what we listen to, and even if you did, you would
not listen to it so you would still not know what you are talking
about. It's ok Harry, we have gotten kind of used to it."

I've seen a few "reich wing radio" types on TV interview shows.
They are without exception scum. Note that I am not talking about
responsible conservatives espousing their point of view. I see
those folks and I listen to what they have to say. Sometimes I
agree with some of what they say and sometimes I don't. But I don't
believe them to be irresponsible buffoons.

What is your definition of a "responsible conservative?" What
characteristics do you use to identify a "responsible conservative?"

The "reich wing radio" types I am talking about the douche bags,
like Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, O'Reilly, et cetera. Scum
of the earth.

Limbaugh is funny and entertaining.

Coulter is funny and entertaining.

Malkin is funny and entertaining.

Hannity is a pompous ass.

O'Reilly is a pompous ass.

Thank god Imus is back.;-)

I can't stand Imus, I put him in the Hannity O'Reilly bucket.

Imus fills all the buckets. He is a funny, entertaining, pompus ass,
among other things. I'd put all the other numbskulls in a bucket with
Harry.

That would be fun to watch.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Science wins again!	Bill[_4_]	ASA	1	October 20th 07 07:06 PM
Sport Science	[email protected]	General	0	July 6th 06 06:51 AM
( OT ) It's not rocket science.	Jim,	General	0	April 19th 05 05:40 PM
Science Marches On!!	Bob Crantz	ASA	1	June 27th 04 06:37 AM

Menu

About Us