On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:24:50 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:34:12 -0500, "jamesgangnc"
wrote:

Canada, there's a real brain trust.

Took time to read that did you?

Obviously not.

Fortunately the majority of the world now recognizes that what people do
is
having an impact on the global environment. So you can disbelieve all you
want and it won't matter ****. Let me guess, you stock piled for y2k too,
right? yuyuk.

Actually no. I made money off of clowns who did.

And I'm making money hand over fist off those who are throwing the
rest of you sheeple to the wolves making you believe their bull****.

I'm laughing all the way to the bank.

Seems as if only Al was making money. The alternative enegy world is just
not profitable yet to make money hand over foot.

Email on the way - hot stock tip.

731% in three years.

And it's only going to go up more.

WaIIy wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:26:31 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

I'm surprised you aren't seeing many folks in the "the earth isn't
even warming at all" category.

Duh, you see many folks, just not the ones that need government grants.

There's no proof of global warming, it doesn't even make sense.


Leave it to Wally... :}

On Dec 20, 1:26Â*am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 19, 8:26Â*pm, wrote:





On Dec 19, 11:04Â*pm, Chuck Gould wrote:

On Dec 19, 4:08�pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908

There is evidence as well as scientific opinion on both sides of the
human-influence factor. Neither your side or the other should trot out
a single study and say "see, that settles it." (Not that you are).

It's amazing the number of people who not only deny that many could
ever have any influence on his global environment, but also insist
that the climate is *not* changing at all...........

Funny, I don't see a lot of folks in that camp, although the Global
Taxing advocates keep citing them. I guess sooner or later I will find
one. My best guess though is it is more of a talking point to
villanize the sceptics.. I guess however if you can keep the arguement
there, where there is really no arguement (weather the earth is
cycling hotter again or not) you don't have to address the very
credible science that says we are not causing it, it's just another
cycle...

I'm surprised you aren't seeing many folks in the "the earth isn't
even warming at all" category. I listen to right-wing talk shows on a
regular basis, (20-30 minutes, a couple of times per week). I have
heard some of the talk show hosts make the following statements, and
every time they do their screeners pass through the predictable 2-3
"confirming" callers that agree with whatever outrageous statement the
host made.

Two of my favorites heard within the last few months:

1. The liberals deliberately put the temperature probes used to
measure global heat trends in the hottest places they could find. Over
asphalt parking lots, on the sunny sides of brick buildings, etc.

2. There are a handful of glaciers actually *increasing* in size, and
if the whole earth was warming like the tax and spend liberals want us
to believe, then no glaciers would be able to grow.

(Sometimes there's a carefully selected individual scientist to add
some crediblity to the schtick).

Not heard on the radio, but heard commonly enough elsewhe "Global
warming is bullship".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Stop listening to hate radio then. I deal with rational folks whenever
I can. And those quotes supposedly made by one and agreed on by
another is not really credible, in fact I suspect the quotes are
"representitive" of what you heard, but not what they said...

wrote:
On Dec 20, 1:26 am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 19, 8:26 pm, wrote:





On Dec 19, 11:04 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 19, 4:08�pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908
There is evidence as well as scientific opinion on both sides of the
human-influence factor. Neither your side or the other should trot out
a single study and say "see, that settles it." (Not that you are).
It's amazing the number of people who not only deny that many could
ever have any influence on his global environment, but also insist
that the climate is *not* changing at all...........
Funny, I don't see a lot of folks in that camp, although the Global
Taxing advocates keep citing them. I guess sooner or later I will find
one. My best guess though is it is more of a talking point to
villanize the sceptics.. I guess however if you can keep the arguement
there, where there is really no arguement (weather the earth is
cycling hotter again or not) you don't have to address the very
credible science that says we are not causing it, it's just another
cycle...
I'm surprised you aren't seeing many folks in the "the earth isn't
even warming at all" category. I listen to right-wing talk shows on a
regular basis, (20-30 minutes, a couple of times per week). I have
heard some of the talk show hosts make the following statements, and
every time they do their screeners pass through the predictable 2-3
"confirming" callers that agree with whatever outrageous statement the
host made.

Two of my favorites heard within the last few months:

1. The liberals deliberately put the temperature probes used to
measure global heat trends in the hottest places they could find. Over
asphalt parking lots, on the sunny sides of brick buildings, etc.

2. There are a handful of glaciers actually *increasing* in size, and
if the whole earth was warming like the tax and spend liberals want us
to believe, then no glaciers would be able to grow.

(Sometimes there's a carefully selected individual scientist to add
some crediblity to the schtick).

Not heard on the radio, but heard commonly enough elsewhe "Global
warming is bullship".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Stop listening to hate radio then. I deal with rational folks whenever
I can. And those quotes supposedly made by one and agreed on by
another is not really credible, in fact I suspect the quotes are
"representitive" of what you heard, but not what they said...



Indeed. The participants on Republican Hate Radio all sound like Archie
Bunker and wouldn't know a glacier from a glazier.

On Dec 20, 7:52Â*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 20, 1:26 am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 19, 8:26 pm, wrote:

On Dec 19, 11:04 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 19, 4:08�pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908
There is evidence as well as scientific opinion on both sides of the
human-influence factor. Neither your side or the other should trot out
a single study and say "see, that settles it." (Not that you are).
It's amazing the number of people who not only deny that many could
ever have any influence on his global environment, but also insist
that the climate is *not* changing at all...........
Funny, I don't see a lot of folks in that camp, although the Global
Taxing advocates keep citing them. I guess sooner or later I will find
one. My best guess though is it is more of a talking point to
villanize the sceptics.. I guess however if you can keep the arguement
there, where there is really no arguement (weather the earth is
cycling hotter again or not) you don't have to address the very
credible science that says we are not causing it, it's just another
cycle...
I'm surprised you aren't seeing many folks in the "the earth isn't
even warming at all" category. I listen to right-wing talk shows on a
regular basis, (20-30 minutes, a couple of times per week). I have
heard some of the talk show hosts make the following statements, and
every time they do their screeners pass through the predictable 2-3
"confirming" callers that agree with whatever outrageous statement the
host made.

Two of my favorites heard within the last few months:

1. The liberals deliberately put the temperature probes used to
measure global heat trends in the hottest places they could find. Over
asphalt parking lots, on the sunny sides of brick buildings, etc.

2. There are a handful of glaciers actually *increasing* in size, and
if the whole earth was warming like the tax and spend liberals want us
to believe, then no glaciers would be able to grow.

(Sometimes there's a carefully selected individual scientist to add
some crediblity to the schtick).

Not heard on the radio, but heard commonly enough elsewhe "Global
warming is bullship".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Stop listening to hate radio then. I deal with rational folks whenever
I can. And those quotes supposedly made by one and agreed on by
another is not really credible, in fact I suspect the quotes are
"representitive" of what you heard, but not what they said...

Indeed. The participants on Republican Hate Radio all sound like Archie
Bunker and wouldn't know a glacier from a glazier.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And your make them all sound like Mother Theresa... Harry, you are an
hater, pure and simple. What's worse is you seem to just do it for
fun.. And by the way, nothing compares to the filth and disrespect
of modern liberal radio, see Air America for reference...

wrote:
On Dec 20, 7:52 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 20, 1:26 am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 19, 8:26 pm, wrote:
On Dec 19, 11:04 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 19, 4:08�pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908
There is evidence as well as scientific opinion on both sides of the
human-influence factor. Neither your side or the other should trot out
a single study and say "see, that settles it." (Not that you are).
It's amazing the number of people who not only deny that many could
ever have any influence on his global environment, but also insist
that the climate is *not* changing at all...........
Funny, I don't see a lot of folks in that camp, although the Global
Taxing advocates keep citing them. I guess sooner or later I will find
one. My best guess though is it is more of a talking point to
villanize the sceptics.. I guess however if you can keep the arguement
there, where there is really no arguement (weather the earth is
cycling hotter again or not) you don't have to address the very
credible science that says we are not causing it, it's just another
cycle...
I'm surprised you aren't seeing many folks in the "the earth isn't
even warming at all" category. I listen to right-wing talk shows on a
regular basis, (20-30 minutes, a couple of times per week). I have
heard some of the talk show hosts make the following statements, and
every time they do their screeners pass through the predictable 2-3
"confirming" callers that agree with whatever outrageous statement the
host made.
Two of my favorites heard within the last few months:
1. The liberals deliberately put the temperature probes used to
measure global heat trends in the hottest places they could find. Over
asphalt parking lots, on the sunny sides of brick buildings, etc.
2. There are a handful of glaciers actually *increasing* in size, and
if the whole earth was warming like the tax and spend liberals want us
to believe, then no glaciers would be able to grow.
(Sometimes there's a carefully selected individual scientist to add
some crediblity to the schtick).
Not heard on the radio, but heard commonly enough elsewhe "Global
warming is bullship".- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Stop listening to hate radio then. I deal with rational folks whenever
I can. And those quotes supposedly made by one and agreed on by
another is not really credible, in fact I suspect the quotes are
"representitive" of what you heard, but not what they said...
Indeed. The participants on Republican Hate Radio all sound like Archie
Bunker and wouldn't know a glacier from a glazier.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And your make them all sound like Mother Theresa... Harry, you are an
hater, pure and simple. What's worse is you seem to just do it for
fun.. And by the way, nothing compares to the filth and disrespect
of modern liberal radio, see Air America for reference...


Sorry, never heard "Air America." The only radio stations we listen to
are the public radio stations.

I have noticed, though, that those fans of "reich wing radio" who post
here are without exception...well, Wallies. :}

On Dec 20, 8:14Â*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 20, 7:52 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 20, 1:26 am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 19, 8:26 pm, wrote:
On Dec 19, 11:04 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 19, 4:08�pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908
There is evidence as well as scientific opinion on both sides of the
human-influence factor. Neither your side or the other should trot out
a single study and say "see, that settles it." (Not that you are).
It's amazing the number of people who not only deny that many could
ever have any influence on his global environment, but also insist
that the climate is *not* changing at all...........
Funny, I don't see a lot of folks in that camp, although the Global
Taxing advocates keep citing them. I guess sooner or later I will find
one. My best guess though is it is more of a talking point to
villanize the sceptics.. I guess however if you can keep the arguement
there, where there is really no arguement (weather the earth is
cycling hotter again or not) you don't have to address the very
credible science that says we are not causing it, it's just another
cycle...
I'm surprised you aren't seeing many folks in the "the earth isn't
even warming at all" category. I listen to right-wing talk shows on a
regular basis, (20-30 minutes, a couple of times per week). I have
heard some of the talk show hosts make the following statements, and
every time they do their screeners pass through the predictable 2-3
"confirming" callers that agree with whatever outrageous statement the
host made.
Two of my favorites heard within the last few months:
1. The liberals deliberately put the temperature probes used to
measure global heat trends in the hottest places they could find. Over
asphalt parking lots, on the sunny sides of brick buildings, etc.
2. There are a handful of glaciers actually *increasing* in size, and
if the whole earth was warming like the tax and spend liberals want us
to believe, then no glaciers would be able to grow.
(Sometimes there's a carefully selected individual scientist to add
some crediblity to the schtick).
Not heard on the radio, but heard commonly enough elsewhe "Global
warming is bullship".- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Stop listening to hate radio then. I deal with rational folks whenever
I can. And those quotes supposedly made by one and agreed on by
another is not really credible, in fact I suspect the quotes are
"representitive" of what you heard, but not what they said...
Indeed. The participants on Republican Hate Radio all sound like Archie
Bunker and wouldn't know a glacier from a glazier.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And your make them all sound like Mother Theresa... Harry, you are an
hater, pure and simple. What's worse is you seem to just do it for
fun.. Â* And by the way, nothing compares to the filth and disrespect
of modern liberal radio, see Air America for reference...

Sorry, never heard "Air America." The only radio stations we listen to
are the public radio stations.

I have noticed, though, that those fans of "reich wing radio" who post
here are without exception...well, Wallies. Â* :}- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But you don't know what we listen to, and even if you did, you would
not listen to it so you would still not know what you are talking
about. It's ok Harry, we have gotten kind of used to it. Man, I wish
the weather would warm up. I mean, your shortcomings are numerous to
say the least and I could tease you for ever, but I would rather get
back to boating I know, I know, I am simple...

On Dec 19, 7:08 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908

I've got a question. Why do you take this article as gospel, the end
all of all ends? After all, everything Canadian you instantly **** on
right here in rec.boats. Then you glean one single article coming from
the great white north, and it's the greatest piece ever written!
Pretty selective, don't you think?

wrote:


But you don't know what we listen to, and even if you did, you would
not listen to it so you would still not know what you are talking
about. It's ok Harry, we have gotten kind of used to it."

I've seen a few "reich wing radio" types on TV interview shows. They are
without exception scum. Note that I am not talking about responsible
conservatives espousing their point of view. I see those folks and I
listen to what they have to say. Sometimes I agree with some of what
they say and sometimes I don't. But I don't believe them to be
irresponsible buffoons.



The "reich wing radio" types I am talking about the douche bags, like
Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, O'Reilly, et cetera. Scum of the earth.

On Dec 20, 8:34 am, HK wrote:
wrote:

But you don't know what we listen to, and even if you did, you would
not listen to it so you would still not know what you are talking
about. It's ok Harry, we have gotten kind of used to it."

I've seen a few "reich wing radio" types on TV interview shows. They are
without exception scum. Note that I am not talking about responsible
conservatives espousing their point of view. I see those folks and I
listen to what they have to say. Sometimes I agree with some of what
they say and sometimes I don't. But I don't believe them to be
irresponsible buffoons.

The "reich wing radio" types I am talking about the douche bags, like
Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, O'Reilly, et cetera. Scum of the earth.

Are there any "douche bags" on the left?