Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Dec 19, 7:08 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908 I've got a question. Why do you take this article as gospel, the end all of all ends? After all, everything Canadian you instantly **** on right here in rec.boats. Then you glean one single article coming from the great white north, and it's the greatest piece ever written! Pretty selective, don't you think? Every day 30,000 people on this planet die of the diseases of poverty A third of the planet doesn't have electricity. A billion people have no clean water. A half a billion people going to bed hungry every night. Since almost every action called for by the global warming alarmists will make life even worse for all these people, why do assholes like you care more about what *may happen* a 100 years in the future instead of paying attention to what's going on now? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 20, 10:33 am, "BillP" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Dec 19, 7:08 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908 I've got a question. Why do you take this article as gospel, the end all of all ends? After all, everything Canadian you instantly **** on right here in rec.boats. Then you glean one single article coming from the great white north, and it's the greatest piece ever written! Pretty selective, don't you think? Every day 30,000 people on this planet die of the diseases of poverty A third of the planet doesn't have electricity. A billion people have no clean water. A half a billion people going to bed hungry every night. Since almost every action called for by the global warming alarmists will make life even worse for all these people, why do assholes like you care more about what *may happen* a 100 years in the future instead of paying attention to what's going on now? Your childish and low-life name calling shows that you aren't bright enough to understand an intelligent response, or you're too narrow minded. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 20, 10:57 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:46:07 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 20, 10:33 am, "BillP" wrote: wrote in message ... On Dec 19, 7:08 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908 I've got a question. Why do you take this article as gospel, the end all of all ends? After all, everything Canadian you instantly **** on right here in rec.boats. Then you glean one single article coming from the great white north, and it's the greatest piece ever written! Pretty selective, don't you think? Every day 30,000 people on this planet die of the diseases of poverty A third of the planet doesn't have electricity. A billion people have no clean water. A half a billion people going to bed hungry every night. Since almost every action called for by the global warming alarmists will make life even worse for all these people, why do assholes like you care more about what *may happen* a 100 years in the future instead of paying attention to what's going on now? Your childish and low-life name calling shows that you aren't bright enough to understand an intelligent response, or you're too narrow minded. Here, Loogy, same question for you but restated: "Since almost every action called for by the global warming alarmists will make life even worse for all these people, why do you care more about what *may happen* a 100 years in the future instead of paying attention to what's going on now? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I, and a lot of others ARE concerned about what's happening now. Does that somehow negate the effort to give our progeny an environment to live in at least as good as ours? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Dec 20, 10:33 am, "BillP" wrote: wrote in message ... On Dec 19, 7:08 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908 I've got a question. Why do you take this article as gospel, the end all of all ends? After all, everything Canadian you instantly **** on right here in rec.boats. Then you glean one single article coming from the great white north, and it's the greatest piece ever written! Pretty selective, don't you think? Every day 30,000 people on this planet die of the diseases of poverty A third of the planet doesn't have electricity. A billion people have no clean water. A half a billion people going to bed hungry every night. Since almost every action called for by the global warming alarmists will make life even worse for all these people, why do assholes like you care more about what *may happen* a 100 years in the future instead of paying attention to what's going on now? Your childish and low-life name calling shows that you aren't bright enough to understand an intelligent response, or you're too narrow minded. Sally, you sound *exactly* like Kevin/Walter/Basskisser. Coincidence? Not a chance. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:33:29 GMT, "BillP" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Dec 19, 7:08 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908 I've got a question. Why do you take this article as gospel, the end all of all ends? After all, everything Canadian you instantly **** on right here in rec.boats. Then you glean one single article coming from the great white north, and it's the greatest piece ever written! Pretty selective, don't you think? Every day 30,000 people on this planet die of the diseases of poverty A third of the planet doesn't have electricity. A billion people have no clean water. A half a billion people going to bed hungry every night. Since almost every action called for by the global warming alarmists will make life even worse for all these people, why do assholes like you care more about what *may happen* a 100 years in the future instead of paying attention to what's going on now? Sounds very much like Bjorn Lomborg ( http://www.lomborg.com/cool_it/ ). When the Senate held their hearings on Global Warming, in which Al Gore was the star, the Democrats walked out when Lomborg came on. That one act said a lot about the Dems and Global Warming. -- John H |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Science wins again! | ASA | |||
Sport Science | General | |||
( OT ) It's not rocket science. | General | |||
Science Marches On!! | ASA |