http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908

Another qualified voice of reason.
Refreshing.

Now, if we can stop the madness before we all go broke trying to fix a
nonexistent problem.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908

Another qualified voice of reason.
Refreshing.

Now, if we can stop the madness before we all go broke trying to fix a
nonexistent problem.

Eisboch



Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican. That tells me what I need to know about the
"opposition."

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:22:00 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908

Another qualified voice of reason.
Refreshing.

Now, if we can stop the madness before we all go broke trying to fix a
nonexistent problem.

Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican. That tells me what I need to know about the
"opposition."

So if I were to tell you that a quick search of the FEC database pulls
up two of those contributors and they both are donors to the DNC,
would that change your opinion on their veracity?

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:22:00 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908
Another qualified voice of reason.
Refreshing.

Now, if we can stop the madness before we all go broke trying to fix a
nonexistent problem.

Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican. That tells me what I need to know about the
"opposition."

So if I were to tell you that a quick search of the FEC database pulls
up two of those contributors and they both are donors to the DNC,
would that change your opinion on their veracity?
Nope.
My statement stands..."almost everyone..."

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:16:07 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908

Another qualified voice of reason.
Refreshing.

Now, if we can stop the madness before we all go broke trying to fix a
nonexistent problem.

Why, that can't be true - The Goracle has pronounced it "settled
science".

We must spend zillions of dollars on solving the problem that doesn't
exist.

It's the American way.

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:34:53 -0500, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:22:00 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908
Another qualified voice of reason.
Refreshing.

Now, if we can stop the madness before we all go broke trying to fix a
nonexistent problem.

Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican. That tells me what I need to know about the
"opposition."

So if I were to tell you that a quick search of the FEC database pulls
up two of those contributors and they both are donors to the DNC,
would that change your opinion on their veracity?

Nope.
My statement stands..."almost everyone..."

Ah - I see.

You are truly amazing.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:34:53 -0500, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:22:00 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908
Another qualified voice of reason.
Refreshing.

Now, if we can stop the madness before we all go broke trying to fix a
nonexistent problem.

Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican. That tells me what I need to know about the
"opposition."
So if I were to tell you that a quick search of the FEC database pulls
up two of those contributors and they both are donors to the DNC,
would that change your opinion on their veracity?
Nope.
My statement stands..."almost everyone..."

Ah - I see.

You are truly amazing.


Because I can construct simple sentences to say what I mean with a bit
of precision?


"Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican." What is there about that sentence you find
confusing?

On Dec 19, 7:48 pm, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:34:53 -0500, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:22:00 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
om...

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908
Another qualified voice of reason.
Refreshing.

Now, if we can stop the madness before we all go broke trying to fix a
nonexistent problem.

Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican. That tells me what I need to know about the
"opposition."
So if I were to tell you that a quick search of the FEC database pulls
up two of those contributors and they both are donors to the DNC,
would that change your opinion on their veracity?
Nope.
My statement stands..."almost everyone..."

Ah - I see.

You are truly amazing.

Because I can construct simple sentences to say what I mean with a bit
of precision?

"Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican." What is there about that sentence you find
confusing?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The source

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:48:19 -0500, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:34:53 -0500, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:22:00 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908
Another qualified voice of reason.
Refreshing.

Now, if we can stop the madness before we all go broke trying to fix a
nonexistent problem.

Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican. That tells me what I need to know about the
"opposition."
So if I were to tell you that a quick search of the FEC database pulls
up two of those contributors and they both are donors to the DNC,
would that change your opinion on their veracity?
Nope.
My statement stands..."almost everyone..."

Ah - I see.

You are truly amazing.

Because I can construct simple sentences to say what I mean with a bit
of precision?

"Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican." What is there about that sentence you find
confusing?

It's not - I understood it perfectly.

Its' just an example of your ability to blame one group while at the
same time absolving your chosen group of any responsibility even
though they both believe the same thing.

It is truly amazing.