| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Settled science? HA!!
"BAR" wrote in message . .. HK wrote: wrote: But you don't know what we listen to, and even if you did, you would not listen to it so you would still not know what you are talking about. It's ok Harry, we have gotten kind of used to it." I've seen a few "reich wing radio" types on TV interview shows. They are without exception scum. Note that I am not talking about responsible conservatives espousing their point of view. I see those folks and I listen to what they have to say. Sometimes I agree with some of what they say and sometimes I don't. But I don't believe them to be irresponsible buffoons. What is your definition of a "responsible conservative?" What characteristics do you use to identify a "responsible conservative?" The "reich wing radio" types I am talking about the douche bags, like Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, O'Reilly, et cetera. Scum of the earth. Limbaugh is funny and entertaining. Coulter is funny and entertaining. Malkin is funny and entertaining. Hannity is a pompous ass. O'Reilly is a pompous ass. Thank god Imus is back.;-) |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Science wins again! | ASA | |||
| Sport Science | General | |||
| ( OT ) It's not rocket science. | General | |||
| Science Marches On!! | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
