wrote in message
...
On Dec 20, 8:34 am, HK wrote:
wrote:

But you don't know what we listen to, and even if you did, you would
not listen to it so you would still not know what you are talking
about. It's ok Harry, we have gotten kind of used to it."

I've seen a few "reich wing radio" types on TV interview shows. They are
without exception scum. Note that I am not talking about responsible
conservatives espousing their point of view. I see those folks and I
listen to what they have to say. Sometimes I agree with some of what
they say and sometimes I don't. But I don't believe them to be
irresponsible buffoons.

The "reich wing radio" types I am talking about the douche bags, like
Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, O'Reilly, et cetera. Scum of the
earth.

Are there any "douche bags" on the left?

Ms. Clinton comes to mind.

wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:34 am, HK wrote:
wrote:

But you don't know what we listen to, and even if you did, you would
not listen to it so you would still not know what you are talking
about. It's ok Harry, we have gotten kind of used to it."
I've seen a few "reich wing radio" types on TV interview shows. They are
without exception scum. Note that I am not talking about responsible
conservatives espousing their point of view. I see those folks and I
listen to what they have to say. Sometimes I agree with some of what
they say and sometimes I don't. But I don't believe them to be
irresponsible buffoons.

The "reich wing radio" types I am talking about the douche bags, like
Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, O'Reilly, et cetera. Scum of the earth.

Are there any "douche bags" on the left?


Sure, but I don't spend any time listening to them, either. But there
are far more on the right, and they are far more successful, because
there is a large audience on the right for the sort of "put down crap"
delivered by the likes of Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, et al. The righties
apparently need their daily fix of hate.

On Dec 20, 9:11 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:34 am, HK wrote:
wrote:

But you don't know what we listen to, and even if you did, you would
not listen to it so you would still not know what you are talking
about. It's ok Harry, we have gotten kind of used to it."
I've seen a few "reich wing radio" types on TV interview shows. They are
without exception scum. Note that I am not talking about responsible
conservatives espousing their point of view. I see those folks and I
listen to what they have to say. Sometimes I agree with some of what
they say and sometimes I don't. But I don't believe them to be
irresponsible buffoons.

The "reich wing radio" types I am talking about the douche bags, like
Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, O'Reilly, et cetera. Scum of the earth.

Are there any "douche bags" on the left?

Sure, but I don't spend any time listening to them, either. But there
are far more on the right, and they are far more successful, because
there is a large audience on the right for the sort of "put down crap"
delivered by the likes of Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, et al. The righties
apparently need their daily fix of hate.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, who are they, name some names?

wrote in news:589a1f87-6d9d-41f3-83ae-
:

I would imagine he was refering to the pirated intellectual property
being sold over there on the streets for the worlds consumption...



He needs to visit the Middle East. I used to travel to Bahrain to fix Navy
ships in the 80's. There were huge stores FILLED with copied cassettes,
mostly from Bangledesh and India, but of every kind of music you ever
heard. Cassettes stacked from floor to ceiling. All were priced at about
$US1 ($US50 today after the Federal Reserve devaluations). Everyone came
home with bags of great cassettes. There's still a few in a drawer around
here, somewhere...

Most small countries don't HAVE a copyright law, making this perfectly
legal. RIAA and MPAA only control the UNITED STATES to the borders. This
bureaucrat needs to check his passport to see what country he represents
for them. It's not the whole planet....

Larry
--
QUOTE OF THE MONTH:
"I have been to several major Chinese cities and have seen first hand shops
crammed with obviously fake American products." - Jon Dudas, Undersecretary
of Commerce for Intellectual Property Rights.

How can they be fake? The Chinese make all "American Products" I use!

HK wrote:
wrote:


But you don't know what we listen to, and even if you did, you would
not listen to it so you would still not know what you are talking
about. It's ok Harry, we have gotten kind of used to it."

I've seen a few "reich wing radio" types on TV interview shows. They are
without exception scum. Note that I am not talking about responsible
conservatives espousing their point of view. I see those folks and I
listen to what they have to say. Sometimes I agree with some of what
they say and sometimes I don't. But I don't believe them to be
irresponsible buffoons.


What is your definition of a "responsible conservative?" What
characteristics do you use to identify a "responsible conservative?"


The "reich wing radio" types I am talking about the douche bags, like
Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, O'Reilly, et cetera. Scum of the earth.

Limbaugh is funny and entertaining.

Coulter is funny and entertaining.

Malkin is funny and entertaining.

Hannity is a pompous ass.

O'Reilly is a pompous ass.

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:22:00 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908

Another qualified voice of reason.
Refreshing.

Now, if we can stop the madness before we all go broke trying to fix a
nonexistent problem.

Eisboch



Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican. That tells me what I need to know about the
"opposition."

And almost everyone who has joined the Al Gore "Send Your Money" bandwagon
is a Democrat. That should tell you something also.
--
John H

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:04:23 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Dec 19, 4:08?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908

There is evidence as well as scientific opinion on both sides of the
human-influence factor. Neither your side or the other should trot out
a single study and say "see, that settles it." (Not that you are).

It's amazing the number of people who not only deny that many could
ever have any influence on his global environment, but also insist
that the climate is *not* changing at all...........

It's amazing the number of people who preach that man is solely responsible
for global warming and that many billions of dollars in the right pockets
will stop it.

*That's* what's amazing!
--
John H

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
HK wrote:
wrote:


But you don't know what we listen to, and even if you did, you would
not listen to it so you would still not know what you are talking
about. It's ok Harry, we have gotten kind of used to it."

I've seen a few "reich wing radio" types on TV interview shows. They are
without exception scum. Note that I am not talking about responsible
conservatives espousing their point of view. I see those folks and I
listen to what they have to say. Sometimes I agree with some of what they
say and sometimes I don't. But I don't believe them to be irresponsible
buffoons.


What is your definition of a "responsible conservative?" What
characteristics do you use to identify a "responsible conservative?"


The "reich wing radio" types I am talking about the douche bags, like
Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, O'Reilly, et cetera. Scum of the
earth.

Limbaugh is funny and entertaining.

Coulter is funny and entertaining.

Malkin is funny and entertaining.

Hannity is a pompous ass.

O'Reilly is a pompous ass.

Thank god Imus is back.;-)

On Dec 20, 1:02�am, WaIIy wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:26:31 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould

wrote:
I'm surprised you aren't seeing many folks in the "the earth isn't
even warming at all" category.

Duh, you see many folks, just not the ones that need government grants.

There's no proof of global warming, it doesn't even make sense.

There you go, JAFM. A good example of "there's no proof that earth is
even warming at all", and right here in the NG. I wouldn't be
surprised to find that almost 1/3 of Americans agree with that
sentiment.

I disagree, to the point where I believe the earth is in a warming
trend. I also believe that warming and cooling trends have long been a
part of the natural cycle. My concern is that we might warm too much
and too quickly; and *if* that's a possibility we should be concerned.
I don't subscribe to the "it's all man's fault" school of thinking,
but neither am I prepared at this point to say that we are unable to
screw up the climate just as we have screwed up much of the rest of
our environment.

wrote in message
...
On Dec 19, 7:08 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908

I've got a question. Why do you take this article as gospel, the end
all of all ends? After all, everything Canadian you instantly **** on
right here in rec.boats. Then you glean one single article coming from
the great white north, and it's the greatest piece ever written!
Pretty selective, don't you think?


Every day 30,000 people on this planet die of the diseases of poverty
A third of the planet doesn't have electricity.
A billion people have no clean water.
A half a billion people going to bed hungry every night.

Since almost every action called for by the global warming alarmists will
make life even worse for all these people, why do assholes like you care
more about what *may happen* a 100 years in the future instead of paying
attention to what's going on now?