CNN sandbags the republican candidates with hostile questions provided
by paid plants. No less than 7 of the 33 were known democratic
supporters, advocates, pundits, or employees....... Who knows how many
of the others were plants too. Yesterday PBS continued by not giving
the republicans a debate, asking only questions that democratic voters
would want answered and avoiding, even disallowing questions about
huge republican issues such as immigration. Today PBS is asking only
leading questions designed to give each a platform to campaign with
their own special issues... What a ****ing joke...

Then the dems say they can't go on FOX because they may have to face
real questions. Note, the repubs have stood in and addressed all
Americans, the dems just dismiss the ones that may not agree with
them. Funny seeing the tape of Hillary a few months back kicking a
"suspected republican" out of a news conference for asking a tough
question.

wrote:
CNN sandbags the republican candidates with hostile questions provided
by paid plants. No less than 7 of the 33 were known democratic
supporters, advocates, pundits, or employees....... Who knows how many
of the others were plants too. Yesterday PBS continued by not giving
the republicans a debate, asking only questions that democratic voters
would want answered and avoiding, even disallowing questions about
huge republican issues such as immigration. Today PBS is asking only
leading questions designed to give each a platform to campaign with
their own special issues... What a ****ing joke...

Then the dems say they can't go on FOX because they may have to face
real questions. Note, the repubs have stood in and addressed all
Americans, the dems just dismiss the ones that may not agree with
them. Funny seeing the tape of Hillary a few months back kicking a
"suspected republican" out of a news conference for asking a tough
question.


They don't go on Faux because it is not a news network, it is a
propaganda network made up of Republican whores.

Next...

On Dec 13, 3:46 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
CNN sandbags the republican candidates with hostile questions provided
by paid plants. No less than 7 of the 33 were known democratic
supporters, advocates, pundits, or employees....... Who knows how many
of the others were plants too. Yesterday PBS continued by not giving
the republicans a debate, asking only questions that democratic voters
would want answered and avoiding, even disallowing questions about
huge republican issues such as immigration. Today PBS is asking only
leading questions designed to give each a platform to campaign with
their own special issues... What a ****ing joke...

Then the dems say they can't go on FOX because they may have to face
real questions. Note, the repubs have stood in and addressed all
Americans, the dems just dismiss the ones that may not agree with
them. Funny seeing the tape of Hillary a few months back kicking a
"suspected republican" out of a news conference for asking a tough
question.

They don't go on Faux because it is not a news network, it is a
propaganda network made up of Republican whores.

Next...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And you defend what CNN and PBS did? You are either ignorant or a
liar.. The next segment on CNN is going to be "undecided
voters" (Hillary campaign workers), CNN proved last week beyond doubt
that they can not be trusted, say what you want about FOX, but at
least the repubs got the balls to face hostile questions and address
other than the choir. The democrats are ALL afraid to address real
issues so they only play to friendly, fixed, forums... I do not want a
president that dismisses me.

wrote:
On Dec 13, 3:46 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
CNN sandbags the republican candidates with hostile questions provided
by paid plants. No less than 7 of the 33 were known democratic
supporters, advocates, pundits, or employees....... Who knows how many
of the others were plants too. Yesterday PBS continued by not giving
the republicans a debate, asking only questions that democratic voters
would want answered and avoiding, even disallowing questions about
huge republican issues such as immigration. Today PBS is asking only
leading questions designed to give each a platform to campaign with
their own special issues... What a ****ing joke...
Then the dems say they can't go on FOX because they may have to face
real questions. Note, the repubs have stood in and addressed all
Americans, the dems just dismiss the ones that may not agree with
them. Funny seeing the tape of Hillary a few months back kicking a
"suspected republican" out of a news conference for asking a tough
question.
They don't go on Faux because it is not a news network, it is a
propaganda network made up of Republican whores.

Next...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And you defend what CNN and PBS did? You are either ignorant or a
liar.. The next segment on CNN is going to be "undecided
voters" (Hillary campaign workers), CNN proved last week beyond doubt
that they can not be trusted, say what you want about FOX, but at
least the repubs got the balls to face hostile questions and address
other than the choir. The democrats are ALL afraid to address real
issues so they only play to friendly, fixed, forums... I do not want a
president that dismisses me.


Fear of Hillary...what could be sweeter?

If Hillary wins the nomination, the Republicans are going to be staining
their shorts, because not one of their possible nominees has the balls
or brains to take her on.

Guiliani? Mr. Family Values? Mr. No Scandals?
Romney? Mr. Flip-Flop?
Huckabee? Mr. Jesus? (Nice guy, though.)
Thompson? Mr. Dead? Stick a fork in him; he's done.
Paul? Mr. Screwball? Bring him on!
McCain? Mr. Experienced? But facing the longest odds
Hunter Mr. Who?
Tancredo Mr. Who's cousin?


None of these losers can face down Hillary *or* Obama.

Gotta love it!

On Dec 13, 3:10 pm, wrote:
CNN sandbags the republican candidates with hostile questions provided
by paid plants. No less than 7 of the 33 were known democratic
supporters, advocates, pundits, or employees....... Who knows how many
of the others were plants too. Yesterday PBS continued by not giving
the republicans a debate, asking only questions that democratic voters
would want answered and avoiding, even disallowing questions about
huge republican issues such as immigration. Today PBS is asking only
leading questions designed to give each a platform to campaign with
their own special issues... What a ****ing joke...

Then the dems say they can't go on FOX because they may have to face
real questions. Note, the repubs have stood in and addressed all
Americans, the dems just dismiss the ones that may not agree with
them. Funny seeing the tape of Hillary a few months back kicking a
"suspected republican" out of a news conference for asking a tough
question.

Yeah, the republicans wouldn't ever think of doing anything of the
sort, huh?

HK wrote:

None of these losers can face down Hillary *or* Obama.

Gotta love it!

But Harry, it seems to me that hillary and Hussian can't face down
each other....

I really think they'll skin each other blind.

On Dec 13, 12:53�pm, wrote:
The democrats are ALL afraid to address real
issues so they only play to friendly, fixed, forums... I do not want a
president that dismisses me.


Time out.

google up: George Bush Free Speech Zone

or: George Bush Protest Zone

think about what you see there, in relationship to what you just
posted above.

No further comment from me, you and Harry carry on. :-)

wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:08:19 -0500, HK wrote:

If Hillary wins the nomination, the Republicans are going to be staining
their shorts, because not one of their possible nominees has the balls
or brains to take her on.

Just be prepared for all the 90s scandals to float back up out of the
muck. We are going to hear about the The Rose Law firm, futures
trades, Whitewater and Vince Foster again. She is running on her past
and it is still all back there. There may not be any substance but
even the most left leaning TV networks can't resist a scandal.
Hillary is not innocent in all of this either, her people have already
attacked things Obama wrote in elementry school and today they accused
him of being a drug dealer. Can the "n" word be far behind?

I am still asking myself, out of 300 million people, perhaps 200
million who are constituionally able to run for president, is this
really the best we can do? If ANY of these weasels can be president,
perhaps we don't even need one.

Maybe we could just have a lottery. We could get an envelope in the
mail with Ed McMahon's picture on it saying
"You may have already won the White House" and we find out we have to
buy a war bond or something to enter.


It's a crappy job and it doesn't pay that well for all the aggravation.

For some reason, Guiliani is still the GOP frontrunner nationally. He
has a scandal to match any and all of Hillary's.

wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:54:25 -0500, HK wrote:

For some reason, Guiliani is still the GOP frontrunner nationally. He
has a scandal to match any and all of Hillary's.

I doubt Rudy will survive February


I dunno. It is not easy trying to handicap the GOP side this year,
because almost all of them seem to be clones of each other or far-out
religiosos or nutcases. The only one I have any respect for is John McCain.

On Dec 13, 10:18 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:54:25 -0500, HK wrote:

For some reason, Guiliani is still the GOP frontrunner nationally. He
has a scandal to match any and all of Hillary's.

I doubt Rudy will survive February

I dunno. It is not easy trying to handicap the GOP side this year,
because almost all of them seem to be clones of each other or far-out
religiosos or nutcases. The only one I have any respect for is John McCain.

Yeah, and the dems cause not one of them has had a real news confernce
or answered real questions. When you are afraid of your posititions
and have no convictions, it is pretty daunting the idea of facing a
followup questions during one of the debates, er, uh, network
sponsored press confreneces