HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 20:22:25 -0500, HK wrote:

Your 49' RV sank at the dock, but was hoisted out and fixed up.
Nope, not even built yet. I hope you're not referring to the
election of Ronald Reagan. We
could use someone with his common sense approach to leadership and
management right now.


Please. Our ATC system has never recovered, and is rapidly heading
straight down the tubes.

They played the strike card and RWR played the you are fired card.
The system recovered. It is the incompetent government contracting
method that has caused the problems.

It's the result of over crowded flight paths, antiquated equipment and
increased demand for flights.
The people in the ATC system do an amazing job under the
circumstances. It has nothing to do with Ronny Wrinkles busting an
illegal strike 20 years ago.

Eisboch



Of course not! Hehehe.

Harry,
The ATC workers went on strike because they wanted a more money, a
reduced work week and a better retirement package. They did not address
or express any concerns about flight paths, equipment or an increase in
customer traffic.

Has anyone told you that your little hehehe does nothing to further a
discussion, but is very patronizing.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Has anyone told you that your little hehehe does nothing to further a
discussion, but is very patronizing.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie.

"HK" wrote in message
. ..



Go pee up a rope, Reggie.


Heh ... that's basically what the ATC said to Reagan in 1981. Didn't work.
:-)

Here's something to refresh your memory:

http://eightiesclub.tripod.com/id296.htm

Eisboch

HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Has anyone told you that your little hehehe does nothing to further a
discussion, but is very patronizing.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie.

Well that certainly contributed to the discussion.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Has anyone told you that your little hehehe does nothing to further a
discussion, but is very patronizing.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie.

Well that certainly contributed to the discussion.

More than you usually do.

HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Has anyone told you that your little hehehe does nothing to further
a discussion, but is very patronizing.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie.

Well that certainly contributed to the discussion.

More than you usually do.
Harry,
I thought you might like this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYo1-tc9Mzw