On Nov 12, 2:52 pm, Gene Kearns
wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:03:05 -0000, penned the
following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|
|You do realize that water vapor has risen rapidly, don't you? Do you
|have any idea why?

Watch out, man, watch out..... when he realizes it is the same
document he wanted to quote with me, but wouldn't accept as fact, he's
probably going to cut and run........

I don't think he has a grasp on what drivel he's posted!

..... and then you'll be piled on by his small town janitor sock
puppet that brags about not being married and still lives with his
mommy in a 700 sq ft house in Podunk, NY! Duck, because he might
actually use the "P" word! He might even make disparaging remarks
about your family!

Ohhhhh.... they're a dangerous pair, they are.....

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats
-----------------www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com- *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

Yep, I already predicted such behavior, and your prediction about the
other pig piling lowlife seems to be coming to fruition, also!

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Nov 12, 2:34 pm, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In messagenews:qo5hj3t2c7bvhid1joj28lvenotn7l2g1e@4ax .com, Gene Kearns
sprach forth the following:





On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:42:28 GMT, BillP penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|
|"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
. ..
| On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:44:15 GMT, BillP penned the following well
| considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
|
| |
| |"Gene Kearns" wrote in
| |
| | Wonderful textbook example of both hasty generalization and false
| | dilemma. Don't they teach logic in schools any more?
| |
| |My statement is logical, sorry if that doesn't fit your religion.
| |
| |Lets make it easy for you- we'll take one at a time.
| |
| |
| |1- Atmospheric CO2 is not the only, not even the primary greenhouse
| |gas. Water Vapor is the major component (95%).
| |
| |Is this a true or false statement ?
| |
|
| Do you accept the entire FAQ document published by NOAA, that
| suggests that CO2 is the second most abundant greenhouse gas, as a
| factual document?
|
|
|Yes I agree that CO2 (approx 3.5% of all greenhouse gases) is the
|second most abundant greenhouse gas behind water vapor, but back to my
|question-
|
|1- Atmospheric CO2 is not the only, not even the primary greenhouse
|gas.
||Water Vapor is the major component (95%).
|
|True or false?
|

Nice try, but either you accept the document as factual or not.

I'm not going to engage is some sort of pointless verbal excursion
with you while you cherry pick passages, from however many documents,
you feel support your pre-defined position.

What a ****ing pussy. With the world's ugliest wife.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


You hide behind usenet calling people names, saying crappy things
about their families, etc, again all the while hiding like a scared
little punk, then have the audacity to call someone else a pussy? Look
in the mirror, lowlife.


What mirror? They're not allowed in his cell.

wrote
I guess that you aren't bright enough or just don't want to think
about things IN CONTEXT, eh?

That, or I'm just not taking you seriously. I retort, you decide...

wrote:
On Nov 12, 9:14 am, "BillP" wrote:
wrote in message

I notice your head is still firmly planted in the sand!
Do The Math
1- Atmospheric CO2 is not the only, not even the primary greenhouse gas.
Water Vapor is the major component (95%).
2- All atmospheric CO2 from all sources is less than (three hundredths) .03
of the total of all greenhouse gases.
3- All man made atmospheric CO2 is less than (nine ten thousandths) .0009 of
all greenhouse gases.
4- All US produced atmospheric CO2 is less than (three hundred twenty four
millionths) .000324 of all greenhouse gases.
5- The Kyoto Protocol requires the US to reduce our atmospheric CO2
production by (four hundred eighty six ten millionths) .0000486 of all
greenhouse gases.
6- This US CO2 reduction is equivalent to reducing a full to the brim
standard US bathtub by 3/4 of a teaspoon. A ratio of 1 to 20,576.

A- It is mathematically unlikely that atmospheric CO2 is the cause of global
warming.
B- It is mathematically improbable that MAN MADE atmospheric CO2 causes
global warming.
C- It is mathematically impossible that US PRODUCED atmospheric CO2 is a
cause of global warming.
D- It is mathematically 20,576 times MORE IMPOSSIBLE that reducing US
produced atmospheric CO2 will have ANY IMPACT at all on global warming.

Do you want to raise all US prices by 32%, raise unemployment by 300%, and
give up US sovereignty to the United Nations in order to remove 3/4 teaspoon
of water from a full bathtub?

Cutting US CO2 production to the levels required by the Kyoto Protocols
results in NO STATISTICAL IMPACT on total atmospheric CO2 and NO PRACTICAL
IMPACT on global warming.

CONCLUSION

There can be only 3 logical reasons why some people are man-made global
warming proponents.
They are either:

1- Ignorant: They don't know the truth.
2- Delusional: They know the truth but refuse to believe it.
3- Liars: They know the truth and believe it, but they promote the lie for
personal benefit.

The world is warming but not because of man's activity.

Yeah, sure, a very few scientists, and only one's with an agenda, come
up with that drivel, while thousands upon thousands (and yes, some of
them have an agenda too) have good hard data to show otherwise. People
like you and Shortwave prefer to stick your heads in the sand and
ignore that data, and will only look at data that you THINK helps make
your point.


Take a stab at telling us why Mars is heating up at the same rate as
Earth. Tell us how the Martians have increased the level of greenhouse
gases in the Martian atmosphere.

You can't look at the Earth without looking at the surrounding planets.

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..


Take a stab at telling us why Mars is heating up at the same rate as
Earth. Tell us how the Martians have increased the level of greenhouse
gases in the Martian atmosphere.

copycats.

Eisboch

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:10:40 -0500, BAR wrote:


Take a stab at telling us why Mars is heating up at the same rate as
Earth. Tell us how the Martians have increased the level of greenhouse
gases in the Martian atmosphere.

Apples and oranges. First, we don't know if Mars is warming. So, no one
can be sure of it's rate. Second, Mars' atmosphere *is* a greenhouse
gas, predominately carbon dioxide.

You can't look at the Earth without looking at the surrounding planets.

And you can't look at the surrounding planets without taking into
consideration their differences, only three have atmospheres, and the
duration of their orbits vary considerably.

I'm guessing that you think the Sun is to blame for our recent
temperature increase. I'd point out, the Sun is the second most studied
body in this Solar System.

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:10:40 -0500, BAR wrote:

Take a stab at telling us why Mars is heating up at the same rate as
Earth. Tell us how the Martians have increased the level of greenhouse
gases in the Martian atmosphere.

Martians, as we all know, live under the surface and have been
hibernating for the last million or so years.

They recently discovered Spirit and Opportunity wandering around on
the surface and believing they are under attack, have awakened and are
now rewarming the surface and reestablishing the atmosphere prepatory
to invading Earth.

You heard it here first.

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:41:34 -0000, wrote:

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:10:40 -0500, BAR wrote:


Take a stab at telling us why Mars is heating up at the same rate as
Earth. Tell us how the Martians have increased the level of greenhouse
gases in the Martian atmosphere.

Apples and oranges. First, we don't know if Mars is warming. So, no one
can be sure of it's rate. Second, Mars' atmosphere *is* a greenhouse
gas, predominately carbon dioxide.

You can't look at the Earth without looking at the surrounding planets.

And you can't look at the surrounding planets without taking into
consideration their differences, only three have atmospheres, and the
duration of their orbits vary considerably.

I'm guessing that you think the Sun is to blame for our recent
temperature increase. I'd point out, the Sun is the second most studied
body in this Solar System.

Nah - not even close. I'd suspect more like, oh I don't know, not
even ranked.

Playboy models are probably the most studied bodies in this Solar
System.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:10:40 -0500, BAR wrote:

Take a stab at telling us why Mars is heating up at the same rate as
Earth. Tell us how the Martians have increased the level of greenhouse
gases in the Martian atmosphere.

Martians, as we all know, live under the surface and have been
hibernating for the last million or so years.

Don't Martians spew CO2 flatulnce?

They recently discovered Spirit and Opportunity wandering around on
the surface and believing they are under attack, have awakened and are
now rewarming the surface and reestablishing the atmosphere prepatory
to invading Earth.

You heard it here first.

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:11:53 GMT, "BillP"
wrote:


"Gene Kearns"
Nice try, but either you accept the document as factual or not.

I'm not going to engage is some sort of pointless verbal excursion
with you while you cherry pick passages, from however many documents,
you feel support your pre-defined position.


LOL, bye............


Oops, sorry Bill. You can't be Bassy.
He never gives up in under two weeks. LOL
Mark E. Williams