LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,536
Default Will gyros replace "fin" stabilizers on larger boats?

On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 21:12:45 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

In this case I think you do. The spinning gyro is within the vacuum
enclosure which is, in turn, on a single axis gimble. The enclosure is used
to transfer the stabilizing force to the beams or stringers on the boat.


Yes, the patent application refers to a gimbal which is dynamically
positioned by an active servo mechanism.

"The drum rotor is mounted in a frame, which in turn is mounted on
gimbals so that the rotor can nutate under the control of the system's
servo system. The servo system's operation is managed by a control
system having input from the ship angular position and rate sensors."

That implies to me that they use the servos to reposition the spin
axis to maximize its effectiveness but I'm not sure.

One of the nice things about using a large gyro stabilizer is that the
system is effective even while anchored or drifting. The Naiad active
fin stabilizers that we have on the GB49 require the boat to be moving
forward at least 6 knots or so to be effective.

I have heard some interesting reports of a much simpler anti-roll
system using port and starboard water tanks connected with a tunnel
which provides a controlled rate of flow between tanks. The size of
the tanks, amount of water and the flow rate of the connecting tunnel
are all carefully calibrated to counteract the natural roll frequency
of the boat. Conceptually it is very simple, uses no power, has no
mechanical or electrical components and is reasonably inexpensive to
implement. One of the guys on the trawler mailing list has it on a 59
footer and is very pleased with it. As with the gyro, it works all
the time, even when the boat is not moving forward. I believe that
his system was designed by a professor at MIT but I could be wrong
about that.

I was thinking about buying a couple of cheap dock boxes, putting them
on the flybridge with some connecting pipes, and doing some
experimentation just for the heck of it. It would be a nice backup
for the Naiads and solve the rolling at anchor problem but the
flybridge cosmetic issue may turn out to be a show stopper. I've got
to figure out a way to hide those pipes or convince Mrs B that the
scientific method can be beautiful! :-)

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...&b tnG=Search

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Jeffrey Boyd" is an anagram of "Midget Runt" in Japanese Steve Leyland ASA 5 October 21st 07 04:54 PM
Battery with "Double the Power" or that takes up "Half the Space" Bart ASA 2 December 6th 06 01:26 AM
Coast Guard says number of "numbered" boats is declining....... [email protected] General 2 June 17th 06 12:29 PM
Towing larger "dingy" John Glynn Cruising 12 February 3rd 06 03:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017