Isn't this easier? (See below)



Bob Ward wrote:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 07:20:02 -0500, "JA" wrote:


sum(k=0)^N (-u_k+(u_k^2+2gh))/g=NUTBAG!

wrote in message
groups.com...

WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
By Herman Schoenfeld

In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
towers. A top-down controlled demolition can be simply characterized
as a "pancake collapse" of a building missing its support columns.
This demolition profile requires that the support columns holding a
floor be destroyed just before that floor is collided with by the
upper falling masses. The net effect is a pancake-style collapse at



What's worse? A Conspiracy kook, or someone who TOP POSTS a single
line, then quotes a 170 line rambling diatribe


I'll never understand the complaining about "top posting." If people
posted to the top you would not have to scroll down through an article
you just read to see the reply.

See above.