On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:04:14 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I felt
like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:35:24 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:04:14 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I felt
like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

Change 'agree' to 'argue' (one letter off) and see if that helps!

(You're getting pretty picky!)

"John H." wrote
I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I
felt like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

(You're getting pretty picky!)

Maybe he's just trying to push someone's bottoms...

"Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote
I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I
felt like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

(You're getting pretty picky!)

Maybe he's just trying to push someone's bottoms...


Or, perhaps he has a low transom.

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:53:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote
I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I
felt like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

(You're getting pretty picky!)

Maybe he's just trying to push someone's bottoms...


Or, perhaps he has a low transom.

I'm telling you - that is never going to end.

Never. :)

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:53:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote
I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I
felt like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.
Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.
(You're getting pretty picky!)
Maybe he's just trying to push someone's bottoms...

Or, perhaps he has a low transom.

I'm telling you - that is never going to end.

Never. :)


Saw a beautiful boat today parked in front of West Marine. It's owner
was in the store, shopping. It was a 2007 (I checked the transom)
Seacrat 23. Classic lines. Seen many of those around, Tom?

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:46:51 -0400, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:53:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote
I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I
felt like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.
Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.
(You're getting pretty picky!)
Maybe he's just trying to push someone's bottoms...

Or, perhaps he has a low transom.

I'm telling you - that is never going to end.

Never. :)

Saw a beautiful boat today parked in front of West Marine. It's owner
was in the store, shopping. It was a 2007 (I checked the transom)
Seacrat 23. Classic lines. Seen many of those around, Tom?

SeaCraft boats? Sure - Johnny Morris owns SeaCraft as part of the
Tracker Marine franchise.

Nice boats, but not what they used to be.

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:40:31 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:53:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote
I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I
felt like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

(You're getting pretty picky!)

Maybe he's just trying to push someone's bottoms...


Or, perhaps he has a low transom.

I'm telling you - that is never going to end.

Never. :)

Heh.

Dangerously low transom...

You know, this low transom stuff is serious business. Seriously.

:-)

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:40:31 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:53:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote
I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I
felt like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.
Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.
(You're getting pretty picky!)
Maybe he's just trying to push someone's bottoms...

Or, perhaps he has a low transom.
I'm telling you - that is never going to end.

Never. :)

Heh.

Dangerously low transom...

You know, this low transom stuff is serious business. Seriously.

:-)


Only to the newsgroup jackoffs. No names, of course.

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:50:30 -0400, "Ernest Scribbler"
wrote:

"John H." wrote
I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I
felt like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

(You're getting pretty picky!)

Maybe he's just trying to push someone's bottoms...


You need to proof read your post before you hit that button. You're liable
to **** someone off talking about the 'bottoms' they're pushing!