but I wasn't too
inclined to find out, considering they were four or five strappin' big
boys
carrying sidearms in a fast-looking aluminum boat with a machine gun on
the
front.

Sure, why grow a spine now?

On Oct 31, 8:19 pm, "Bill Kearney" wkearney-99@hot-mail-com wrote:
but I wasn't too
inclined to find out, considering they were four or five strappin' big
boys
carrying sidearms in a fast-looking aluminum boat with a machine gun on
the
front.

Sure, why grow a spine now?

Why pick a fight with someone doing his job?

wrote:
On Oct 31, 8:19 pm, "Bill Kearney" wkearney-99@hot-mail-com wrote:
but I wasn't too
inclined to find out, considering they were four or five strappin' big
boys
carrying sidearms in a fast-looking aluminum boat with a machine gun on
the
front.
Sure, why grow a spine now?

Why pick a fight with someone doing his job?


I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I felt
like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:04:14 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I felt
like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:35:24 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:04:14 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I felt
like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

Change 'agree' to 'argue' (one letter off) and see if that helps!

(You're getting pretty picky!)

"John H." wrote
I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I
felt like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

(You're getting pretty picky!)

Maybe he's just trying to push someone's bottoms...

"Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote
I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I
felt like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

(You're getting pretty picky!)

Maybe he's just trying to push someone's bottoms...


Or, perhaps he has a low transom.

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:50:30 -0400, "Ernest Scribbler"
wrote:

"John H." wrote
I agree, I would never agree with the cop or USCG at the time, if I
felt like my rights were violated, I would handle it after the fact.

Reggie, you need to take a bit more time proof reading your posts
before you hit that send bottom. Seriously.

(You're getting pretty picky!)

Maybe he's just trying to push someone's bottoms...


You need to proof read your post before you hit that button. You're liable
to **** someone off talking about the 'bottoms' they're pushing!