Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
JimH wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:04:39 -0400, HK wrote: VISTA isn't slow if you are running the right processor and an appropriate amount of memory for the applications you use. You really shouldn't need a state-of-the-art, multi-core, multi processor, 2 Gig PC just to support the operating system, although I have to admit that IBM has frequently moved in that direction. Today's VISTA compatible PCs have more hardware resources available to them than a corporate mainframe computer 15 years ago. To do what? Browse the web, type EMAILs, run spreadsheets, play music.... Ridiculous. "640k of memory should be enough for anybody" Bill Gates, circa 1981 Old Wayne sounds like those losing control IT managers of the mid 1980s who were terrified by PCs because they meant that users could kind of do things their way instead of his way. You haven't got a clue about being an IT manager. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More on Vista......... | General | |||
Yo - Red Sox fans... | General | |||
Yo - Red Sox fans... | General | |||
Yo - Red Sox fans... | General | |||
Yo - Red Sox fans... | General |