Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:03:32 -0500, John H.
wrote:

if you don't want comments about the decisions you make, why do you
continue to tell us all your decisions?

It's a given that all decisions and opinions posted here will be
examined, parsed and discussed in great detail.

Not by me. I already know whose posts are worth reading carefully and
whose are not. These days, I give your posts the 10 seconds they
deserve, but you do get more time than Reggie and a few others.

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:35:27 -0400, HK wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:03:32 -0500, John H.
wrote:

if you don't want comments about the decisions you make, why do you
continue to tell us all your decisions?

It's a given that all decisions and opinions posted here will be
examined, parsed and discussed in great detail.

Not by me. I already know whose posts are worth reading carefully and
whose are not. These days, I give your posts the 10 seconds they
deserve, but you do get more time than Reggie and a few others.

Do you spend a lot of time analyzing Jimh's decisions?

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:35:27 -0400, HK wrote:

Not by me. I already know whose posts are worth reading carefully and
whose are not. These days, I give your posts the 10 seconds they
deserve, but you do get more time than Reggie and a few others.

Harry, it bothers me not whether you read my posts or otherwise. Like
a good umpire, I'll continue to call things as I see them.