Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,543
Default G**gle goes political...

On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 03:58:23 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:



Funny how that works ain't it. Even though we don't all know each
other, or even agree politically, we are brought together by a mutual
disrespect for you...You have done this to yourself with your bull****
and psudo-intellectual attitude. So quit your cryin' get in the barrel
and pucker up...


I'll tell you what, Clevis: You start writing content that wouldn't get a
6th grader a failing grade, and I'll change my tune. Until that time, your
turn in the barrel's going to be a rough one. All you need to do is write,
walk away from the computer, get some fresh air, come back, read it again,
and edit before you click send. I don't even give a damn about your
infantile spelling. It's the content, like criticizing a corporation for
doing what's best for its bottom line.


He needs to do all that stuff, like you do...correct?

Doug, reread the paragraph above yours.

I need a bag of New Jersey tomatoes. That'll give you something to work on
for a few days.
  #32   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,892
Default G**gle goes political...

On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling
him names! Precious!

  #33   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,590
Default G**gle goes political...

On Oct 14, 11:05 am, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote:





On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:


wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling
him names! Precious!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -





And of course you misrepresented my statements (anyone surprised?). I
never said you called "me" names, I made reference to him calling
others
names, Coulter for instance. Another intellectually dishonest
progressive, who would have thought




  #34   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,892
Default G**gle goes political...

On Oct 13, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:13 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


groups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL


He's taking lessons from BoogerPicker.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Why the name calling?

  #35   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats,rec.gardens,alt.autos.toyota,rec.food.cooking,alt.guitar.bass
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
Default G**gle goes political Doug Kanter dances!


"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
John, go play in the street. Please.

Go dancing Dougie, err Joe.

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891




  #36   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats,rec.gardens,alt.autos.toyota,rec.food.cooking,alt.guitar.bass
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
Default G**gle goes political Doug Kanter dances!


"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
It's cute the way you girls need to work in teams.

Not as cute as you dancing dougie!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891



  #37   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,543
Default G**gle goes political...

On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:48:13 -0000, wrote:

On Oct 13, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:13 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


groups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL


He's taking lessons from BoogerPicker.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Why the name calling?


If you're talking to me, 'BoogerPicker' is just much easier to remember
than 'LoogerPicker'. Is one, in your opinion, worse than the other?
  #38   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,892
Default G**gle goes political...

On Oct 14, 3:21 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:48:13 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:13 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


groups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL


He's taking lessons from BoogerPicker.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Why the name calling?


If you're talking to me, 'BoogerPicker' is just much easier to remember
than 'LoogerPicker'. Is one, in your opinion, worse than the other?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Not necessarily, but as newsgroup sheriff, and one who always wants
people to quit such practices, it seems damned ironic that you don't
practice what you preach.

  #39   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,892
Default G**gle goes political...

On Oct 14, 11:10 am, wrote:
On Oct 14, 11:05 am, wrote:





On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote:


On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:


wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling
him names! Precious!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


And of course you misrepresented my statements (anyone surprised?). I
never said you called "me" names, I made reference to him calling
others
names, Coulter for instance. Another intellectually dishonest
progressive, who would have thought- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Why do you call out people for name calling when you do exactly the
same thing? You should practice what you preach.

  #40   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,515
Default G**gle goes political...

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 14, 11:10 am, wrote:
On Oct 14, 11:05 am, wrote:





On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote:


On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:


wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am,
wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by
G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda
by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti
Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and
has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of
the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy"


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that
they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think
that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an
opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say
that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to
make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an
armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy...
(oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the
military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just
progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The
reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody.
If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or
maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of
service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to
understand this,
so
you are off the hook


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely
possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently
damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the
future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted
text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will
respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept
or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing
illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta
spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in
the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is
to
change feet


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't
you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling
him names! Precious!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


And of course you misrepresented my statements (anyone surprised?). I
never said you called "me" names, I made reference to him calling
others
names, Coulter for instance. Another intellectually dishonest
progressive, who would have thought- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Why do you call out people for name calling when you do exactly the
same thing? You should practice what you preach.


If you have enough people who agree with you, you can get away with that
sort of thing. So, for example, he says I'm a liar. But, he has problems
backing up this accusation.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some non political OT... Short Wave Sportfishing General 3 December 7th 04 03:57 PM
OT Political Martin Baxter ASA 0 October 26th 04 02:38 PM
( OT ) Non political Jim General 3 March 30th 04 07:30 PM
( OT) Not political Jim General 0 March 9th 04 10:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017