Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 11, 8:46?am, John H. wrote: On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:26:49 -0400, HK wrote: US eyes boom in nuclear reactors By Laura Smith-Spark BBC News, Washington Almost three decades have passed since the last application was filed to build a new nuclear reactor in the US. Now, up to 30 are expected in the next three years. About time. The article doesn't mention that new technology greatly reduces the amount of waste from the plants. This is one case where the French have led the way. We've wasted too much time not following their lead. You've gotta admit that the Calvert plant has helped the fishing in the area! Especially at night. Aren't the fish easier to find when they glow in the dark? :-) Only disaster we had was the 3 mile island plant and that was mostly caused by a must hire person. Equal Opportunity. They overrode the computer and shut off the cooling water. Other problem we had, as there were only about 2 plants built from the same plans. And they built those in reverse image of each other. All the plants in France are exactly the same. Cookie Cutters! The bathrooms are in the same location, the doors are in the same location, the control rooms are exactly identical. Allows anyone trained in a plant to work in any plant, without further training. As to union being the only competent ones. Nope. They may have better training as a pipefitter, but not the only ones competent. My brother was a Seabee and was one of the welders on the Nuke at the American base in the Antarctic. Plant worked well, did not fail and was not union constructed. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
N. Loreans don't trust Bush, Announce Nukes | General | |||
OT--Israeli intelligence says Iran less than 12 months away from nukes | General |