Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 10:26 am, HK wrote:
especially since the jobs created will be union jobs. Yeah, we need unions to do to the nuke industry what they have done to the Grocery, Airline, Auto, Manufacturing, and so many other industries who have been driven over the borders, and into bankruptcy... |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 10:58 am, HK wrote:
wrote: On Oct 11, 10:26 am, HK wrote: especially since the jobs created will be union jobs. Yeah, we need unions to do to the nuke industry what they have done to the Grocery, Airline, Auto, Manufacturing, and so many other industries who have been driven over the borders, and into bankruptcy... Please. The skills required by the steamfitters who build nuke plants are not easily found among the non-unionized workforce. You need years of specialized training for that kind of work. Just because you don't have the skills necessary for high-end work doesn't mean you have to take potshots at those who do. My friend was an inspector/engineer at Haddam Neck... I know a lot more than you would think. I am not sure I want an organizaton that serves to protect the lowest common denominator from getting fired for not doing their job, building a nuke plant. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 11:07 am, HK wrote:
wrote: On Oct 11, 10:58 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Oct 11, 10:26 am, HK wrote: especially since the jobs created will be union jobs. Yeah, we need unions to do to the nuke industry what they have done to the Grocery, Airline, Auto, Manufacturing, and so many other industries who have been driven over the borders, and into bankruptcy... Please. The skills required by the steamfitters who build nuke plants are not easily found among the non-unionized workforce. You need years of specialized training for that kind of work. Just because you don't have the skills necessary for high-end work doesn't mean you have to take potshots at those who do. My friend was an inspector/engineer at Haddam Neck... I know a lot more than you would think. I am not sure I want an organizaton that serves to protect the lowest common denominator from getting fired for not doing their job, building a nuke plant. Ahh, lowest common denominator...the Bush clowns.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Even you can't defend unions. Bush has nothing to do with it. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 11:02 am, wrote:
.. I am not sure I want an organizaton that serves to protect the lowest common denominator from getting fired for not doing their job, building a nuke plant. Specialized training Mandatory drug testing Safety training Turnover problems And on and on...... |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 10:58 am, HK wrote:
The skills required by the steamfitters who build nuke plants are not easily found among the non-unionized workforce. And this is just bull****. More than likely, just the opposite. Unions protect those who could not compete in a free market society. Please Harry, show me some statistics or research that backs up this statement. Or, just put me in the bozo bin again ![]() |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 7:44?am, wrote:
On Oct 11, 10:26 am, HK wrote: especially since the jobs created will be union jobs. Yeah, we need unions to do to the nuke industry what they have done to the Grocery, Airline, Auto, Manufacturing, and so many other industries who have been driven over the borders, and into bankruptcy... One batch of *******s steals for one group of special interests, and the other batch of *******s steals for the other. Industries haven't been "driven over the borders", they have moved to where socialist economies, substandard "standards" of living, and very little expectation of property ownership or wealth accumulation among the working class provide unlimited numbers of people willing to work for $50-$100 US per week. I'm sure that if there were enough people in the US willing to sleep in cardboard boxes along side the road, eat 600 calories a day, die of simple diseases before age 45 and therefore able to work for that same $50-$100 a week the industries that have been "driven away" would come back in a heartbeat. But we can't simply blame the industrialists. (On topic, here..). Certain products wouldn't even exist if they had to be built in the US. Sure, when WalMart dictates to an appliance company that it will only pay $6 for a waffle iron (but will buy a million of them a year) a lot of companies are forced to move offshore to compete. That $6 wholesale allows Walmart to sell that waffle iron for $19.99 and come out OK. If Walmart would pay $10 for the same waffle iron, consumers might have to pay $25, but there would be a waffle iron factory in Chicago rather than in Shanghai..... but that's waffle irons, and not what I'm referring to. When it comes to boats it's not so simple. Even manufacturing in China results in 7-figure price tages on 55-60 foot boats. Having $1-million puts you somewhere near upper-middle class these days, (70,000 families in my home county are reputed to have $1 million or more in net financial assets *excluding* equity in a home), but still there are a limited number of people who have the means and will so prioritize their spending to sink $1,2, or 3 million into a boat. Manufacturing some of the larger yacts in the US, even in a "right to work (for less)" environment would probably double the pricing on many large yachts. Case in point: Recently compared two very nice boats. One built in the US selling for just under $900,000 and one bult in China selling for just over $1mm. The US boat is a 42-footer, the boat built in China is 59 feet. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
N. Loreans don't trust Bush, Announce Nukes | General | |||
OT--Israeli intelligence says Iran less than 12 months away from nukes | General |