Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 11:26 am, HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:34:33 -0400, HK wrote: How many times do you have to be told, Reggie? Don't offer me advice and don't ask me questions. Make that read "embarassing" questions. No, Wayne, that isn't it. Sorry. Harry, I am sure many people would want to know what changed in 4 stroke tech. vs 2 stroke tech. that made you change your mind? From what I can tell, the ETEC is an improvement over the Optimax you had, and 4 stroke is 4 stroke. There were no changes in 4 v. 2 technology that made me change my mind. Hope that helps. So why did you change your mind? About what, specifically?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I don't really remember but I think he is suggesting that you used to be against 4 strokes, now you swear by them. Personally I don't see a problem with that as long as the 4 have "come around". Technology advances, smart folks adjust. I remember an old tech teacher talking about all the mechanics that refused to change over when cars went from generators, to alternators. He noted however that most of them had put windows in place of garage doors and made their living selling milk, cigs, and bread ![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
my website demise | Boat Building | |||
OT-Ebbers blames union for demise of MCI | ASA |