| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
"John H." wrote in message
news  On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax. com... There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few days. If you're not aware of this....you know why. Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education in school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible after the rape. Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise that she might wait before dealing with the results of rape. If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported their taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible. Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments? Have I called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in every post? Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer your question. I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may have found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find. I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of them can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment. So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or your nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons to call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the group, so I don't feel too badly. How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit? I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the same criteria you desire for 'socialism'? " I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause conflict. Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in a political forum. I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for you. The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition, I'll be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it." You forgot to look up "sot". |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| judging current; rules of thumb? | ASA | |||
| Judging by the large number of military... | General | |||
| you won't reject me judging before your sharp hallway | ASA | |||
| get your wickedly judging exit towards my hair | ASA | |||
| you won't tease me judging over your smart doorway | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
