Judging the performers...
 

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:


"Reproductive rights" has no meaning in the context of abortion.

Does religious freedom include the right to be atheist?

Judging the performers...
 

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:57:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

But why continue, this subject is a very personal matter and has to be
resolved by each person individually. Not a subject I like to get into a
****ing contest over like some of the entries in this group.

Good advice (for a duck).

Judging the performers...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:24:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:09:57 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"D.Duck" wrote in message
news:BOidnbj71r8Mo5DanZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@giganews .com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:05:41 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:rrbqg3p5spkcfh3iaqnc6uag3jrekmj281@4a x.com...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:45:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
news:hMidneFBRJUzgZDanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...


What do you think should happen if:

- A 16 year old girl is raped and becomes pregnant
- Her parents are fully aware of the rape
- Her parents are dead set against her having an abortion


How many abortions are performed due to rape versus the number
performed
following consenting sexual relations that results in an
inconvenient
pregnancy?

Eisboch


I don't know. Why is a statistic important to a girl who doesn't
want
to
carry a baby that was conceived in an act of violence?


The 'morning after' pill seems designed for just such an
eventuality.
I
think it should be part of any post-rape treatment.

Good for you. Unfortunately, certain cults think that pill is as bad
as
having an abortion a month or two later.



In my scenario, there is no 'knowingly' killing a kid. That's how I
can
resolve the issue.

John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to
kill
a
fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape
treatment.
How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts?

Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after?

No, but I *do* know that some women don't deal with the mess the very
next
day, for various reasons, at least one of which someone here will pounce
on
shortly, in a nauseatingly predictable fashion.


Are these women who wait five or six months and *then* decide they were
raped?

Why do you find it necessary to make personal attacks with every post?

Because you pounced as expected, which is nauseating. Either you're doing
it
intentionally to be annoying, or you're painfully stupid.

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few days. If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible after the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.

Judging the performers...
 

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

But why continue, this subject is a very personal matter and has to be
resolved by each person individually.

Bingo. The duck wins a lifetime supply of its favorite beer, and a freezer
full of Mrs Paul's fish sticks.

Judging the performers...
 

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:57:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

But why continue, this subject is a very personal matter and has to be
resolved by each person individually. Not a subject I like to get into a
****ing contest over like some of the entries in this group.

Good advice (for a duck).

Ya know, there are some intelligent Ducks. Look at Mr. Aflac.
We're not just all oily feathers. 8)

Judging the performers...
 

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

But why continue, this subject is a very personal matter and has to be
resolved by each person individually.

Bingo. The duck wins a lifetime supply of its favorite beer, and a freezer
full of Mrs Paul's fish sticks.


AF-LAC.....

Judging the performers...
 

On Oct 11, 12:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...





On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:24:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:09:57 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"D.Duck" wrote in message
news:BOidnbj71r8Mo5DanZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@giganews .com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
news:2lfqg390ei8nk7vak8imia2og62oj2ref0@4ax. com...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:05:41 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:rrbqg3p5spkcfh3iaqnc6uag3jrekmj281@4a x.com...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:45:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
news:hMidneFBRJUzgZDanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
y...

What do you think should happen if:

- A 16 year old girl is raped and becomes pregnant
- Her parents are fully aware of the rape
- Her parents are dead set against her having an abortion

How many abortions are performed due to rape versus the number
performed
following consenting sexual relations that results in an
inconvenient
pregnancy?

Eisboch

I don't know. Why is a statistic important to a girl who doesn't
want
to
carry a baby that was conceived in an act of violence?

The 'morning after' pill seems designed for just such an
eventuality.
I
think it should be part of any post-rape treatment.

Good for you. Unfortunately, certain cults think that pill is as bad
as
having an abortion a month or two later.

In my scenario, there is no 'knowingly' killing a kid. That's how I
can
resolve the issue.

John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to
kill
a
fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape
treatment.
How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts?

Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after?

No, but I *do* know that some women don't deal with the mess the very
next
day, for various reasons, at least one of which someone here will pounce
on
shortly, in a nauseatingly predictable fashion.

Are these women who wait five or six months and *then* decide they were
raped?

Why do you find it necessary to make personal attacks with every post?

Because you pounced as expected, which is nauseating. Either you're doing
it
intentionally to be annoying, or you're painfully stupid.

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few days. If
you're not aware of this....you know why.

Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible after the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape

Wow, what a hero... We notice you never talk about your own family.
Personally, I think you yourself show all the signs of an incest
victim, and with your self indulgent tendencies, I might imagine you
have passed along the favor. There is help for folks like you, clergy,
groups, suicide.. either way, it's not here, no one really cares Joe,
go get some help...

Judging the performers...
 

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...


John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to kill
a fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape
treatment. How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts?

Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after?


To me, if there was conception, then indeed, there is a fetus.

Eisboch

I was going to carry on this discussion based on the medical definition
that a "fetus" emerges at about eight weeks after conception. Prior to
being a "fetus" it's technical name is embryo.

I believe that's a pretty fine line.

But why continue, this subject is a very personal matter and has to be
resolved by each person individually. Not a subject I like to get into a
****ing contest over like some of the entries in this group.


You are right, of course, and it's why I wrote, "To me". I realize many
disagree, medically, morally and politically, but it is why I personally
cannot support across the board abortions.

Eisboch

Judging the performers...
 

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:52:49 -0700, -rick- wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:


"Reproductive rights" has no meaning in the context of abortion.

Does religious freedom include the right to be atheist?

Of course - it's just another belief system.

Which, when you think about it, is kind of ironic.

Judging the performers...
 

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:54:36 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:34:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

6. Admitted Yankees fan.

Number 5 (and 6) are bothersome for me.

I view #6 as a plus of course. It is doubtful that she knew anything
about the Yankees however before adopting NY as her home.

I have seen Hilary work from close up. She is very adept, shrewd and
does her homework very well. It's difficult to say what she really
believes in other than ambition.

I agree with you.

The one caveat is that I don't think she's as smart as her fans think
she is. And based on some of her recent proposals - "baby bounty"
comes to mind - math isn't her strong point either.

Judging the performers...
 

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:57:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Eisboch" wrote in message
m...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...


John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to kill
a fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape
treatment. How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts?

Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after?


To me, if there was conception, then indeed, there is a fetus.

Eisboch

I was going to carry on this discussion based on the medical definition that
a "fetus" emerges at about eight weeks after conception. Prior to being a
"fetus" it's technical name is embryo.

I believe that's a pretty fine line.

But why continue, this subject is a very personal matter and has to be
resolved by each person individually. Not a subject I like to get into a
****ing contest over like some of the entries in this group.

Here's my view - one time only. It's pretty simple.

If we can describe single cell micobes as "life" in the generic sense,
it only logical to extend that definition of "life" to conception -
the conceived "life" is human because the results are a human being.
From a logic standpoint, it can't be any other way.

Essentially, if you get caught, expect conseguences of your actions -
take some responsibility for your actions - don't foist your inability
to properly protect yourself on the unborn human.

I reluctantly support choice in the case of rape, inceest or extreme
physical/mental disability - that's a personal decision and I can't
foist my opinion on anybody else in that matter.

However, abortion as a function of birth control? No.

And that's the end of this discussion. :)

Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:08:40 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:24:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:09:57 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"D.Duck" wrote in message
news:BOidnbj71r8Mo5DanZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@giganew s.com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:05:41 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:rrbqg3p5spkcfh3iaqnc6uag3jrekmj281@4 ax.com...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:45:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
news:hMidneFBRJUzgZDanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@g iganews.com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...


What do you think should happen if:

- A 16 year old girl is raped and becomes pregnant
- Her parents are fully aware of the rape
- Her parents are dead set against her having an abortion


How many abortions are performed due to rape versus the number
performed
following consenting sexual relations that results in an
inconvenient
pregnancy?

Eisboch


I don't know. Why is a statistic important to a girl who doesn't
want
to
carry a baby that was conceived in an act of violence?


The 'morning after' pill seems designed for just such an
eventuality.
I
think it should be part of any post-rape treatment.

Good for you. Unfortunately, certain cults think that pill is as bad
as
having an abortion a month or two later.



In my scenario, there is no 'knowingly' killing a kid. That's how I
can
resolve the issue.

John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to
kill
a
fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape
treatment.
How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts?

Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after?

No, but I *do* know that some women don't deal with the mess the very
next
day, for various reasons, at least one of which someone here will pounce
on
shortly, in a nauseatingly predictable fashion.


Are these women who wait five or six months and *then* decide they were
raped?

Why do you find it necessary to make personal attacks with every post?

Because you pounced as expected, which is nauseating. Either you're doing
it
intentionally to be annoying, or you're painfully stupid.

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few days. If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible after the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments? Have I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in every
post?

Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:12:38 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:52:49 -0700, -rick- wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:


"Reproductive rights" has no meaning in the context of abortion.

Does religious freedom include the right to be atheist?

Of course - it's just another belief system.

Which, when you think about it, is kind of ironic.

I don't understand something. We are born not believing in God (agnostic?).
An atheist then develops the belief that what he didn't believe in (in the
first place) definitely does *not* exist. And then the atheist works to
convince others that what he didn't believe existed and now believes
doesn't exist, doesn't exist and should be shunned.

Life is rough.

Judging the performers...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message

snip

And that's the end of this discussion. :)


Amen....

Judging the performers...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments? Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer your
question.

Judging the performers...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.

Judging the performers...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

You have a dictionary. Use it.

Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments? Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:15:51 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

The one caveat is that I don't think she's as smart as her fans think
she is.

I don't consider myself a fan but I think you may be underestimating
her. In politics you don't have to be a rocket scientist to be well
above average.

Judging the performers...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax. com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition, I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".

Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

Judging the performers...
 

On Oct 11, 11:13 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...





On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax. com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.

Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.

If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.

I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.

So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?

I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"

I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition, I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

S.O.T. Sit-on-top. A small plastic kayak like a Pungo made for flat
water. You don't sit in them, you sit on top of them. Of course Joe
probably has some other meaning only he thinks is clever. I wonder if
there is anyone else on the group that could not get a single fishing
invite.. unless it's to beat the **** out of him and make a fool of
him;(

Judging the performers...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:13:27 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:r7esg3d21ae39kgia1hani1l0f427icser@4ax. com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4a x.com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in
a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".


Except in your mind, I've not imbibed alcoholic beverages for almost 20
years now. So, I'm guessing you've made up your own definition.

And, that's OK! :)

Well, then there must be some other explanation for some of your childish
messages. See your doctor.

Judging the performers...
 

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 11, 11:13 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...





On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax. com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.

Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.

If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack
in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.

I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could
find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.

So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling,
and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?

I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"

I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle
in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

S.O.T. Sit-on-top. A small plastic kayak like a Pungo made for flat
water. You don't sit in them, you sit on top of them. Of course Joe
probably has some other meaning only he thinks is clever. I wonder if
there is anyone else on the group that could not get a single fishing
invite.. unless it's to beat the **** out of him and make a fool of
him;(


Au contraire, Clevis. Captain Francis has invited me, although I suspect he
regrets having done so by now. :-)

Judging the performers...
 

John H. wrote:

I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?


it's OK with me, thats also my birthday.

Hope all goes well with you, John. and hope the surgery and recovery
is smooth.

Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition, I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

Judging the performers...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:24:22 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:13:27 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:dafsg31kckl75okvp5vptdumbr3ni133qs@4ax. com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:r7esg3d21ae39kgia1hani1l0f427icser@4a x.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@ 4ax.com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as
possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack
in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should
answer
your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could
find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling,
and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle
in
a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".


Except in your mind, I've not imbibed alcoholic beverages for almost 20
years now. So, I'm guessing you've made up your own definition.

And, that's OK! :)

Well, then there must be some other explanation for some of your childish
messages. See your doctor.


I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?

Doug, yesterday you got royally dumped on by just about everyone in the
group. Shouldn't you take a day or two off?

If you take off two days, I'll take off one.

Judging the performers...
 

On Oct 11, 11:26 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 11, 11:13 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

. ..

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax. com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.

Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.

If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack
in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.

I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could
find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.

So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling,
and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?

I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"

I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle
in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

S.O.T. Sit-on-top. A small plastic kayak like a Pungo made for flat
water. You don't sit in them, you sit on top of them. Of course Joe
probably has some other meaning only he thinks is clever. I wonder if
there is anyone else on the group that could not get a single fishing
invite.. unless it's to beat the **** out of him and make a fool of
him;(

Au contraire, Clevis. Captain Francis has invited me, although I suspect he
regrets having done so by now. :-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I doubt it. T is a charitable kind of guy.. Even takes me fishin'.
However iirc the invite was to beat the **** out of you fishin' and
make a fool of you. But after your initial "your spot, your terms",
you started changing the conditions....

Judging the performers...
 

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:03:01 -0700, Tim wrote:

John H. wrote:
I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?

it's OK with me, thats also my birthday.

Hope all goes well with you, John. and hope the surgery and recovery
is smooth.

The doctor says no golf for *four* months! Crap!


Neck operation? What did you do to yourself?

Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:13:27 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax .com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition, I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".


Except in your mind, I've not imbibed alcoholic beverages for almost 20
years now. So, I'm guessing you've made up your own definition.

And, that's OK! :)

Judging the performers...
 

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 11, 11:26 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 11, 11:13 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

. ..

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax. com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for
a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.

Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as
possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.

If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have
supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities,
questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal
attack
in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should
answer
your
question.

I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I
may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could
find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some
of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.

So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling,
and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others
in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and
within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?

I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one,
using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"

I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your
mettle
in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do
for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the
definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

S.O.T. Sit-on-top. A small plastic kayak like a Pungo made for flat
water. You don't sit in them, you sit on top of them. Of course Joe
probably has some other meaning only he thinks is clever. I wonder if
there is anyone else on the group that could not get a single fishing
invite.. unless it's to beat the **** out of him and make a fool of
him;(

Au contraire, Clevis. Captain Francis has invited me, although I suspect
he
regrets having done so by now. :-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I doubt it. T is a charitable kind of guy.. Even takes me fishin'.
However iirc the invite was to beat the **** out of you fishin' and
make a fool of you. But after your initial "your spot, your terms",
you started changing the conditions....


He offered a choice of venues, if I recall, Clevis.

Judging the performers...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:06:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:24:22 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:13:27 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:p4isg39922ve9lotcs8u0abtegk0pckann@4ax. com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:dafsg31kckl75okvp5vptdumbr3ni133qs@4a x.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:r7esg3d21ae39kgia1hani1l0f427icser@ 4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oenn ...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for
a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as
possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have
supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities,
questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal
attack
in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should
answer
your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I
may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could
find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some
of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling,
and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others
in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and
within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one,
using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your
mettle
in
a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do
for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the
definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".


Except in your mind, I've not imbibed alcoholic beverages for almost
20
years now. So, I'm guessing you've made up your own definition.

And, that's OK! :)

Well, then there must be some other explanation for some of your
childish
messages. See your doctor.


I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?

Doug, yesterday you got royally dumped on by just about everyone in the
group. Shouldn't you take a day or two off?

If you take off two days, I'll take off one.


OK, 29 and 30 November. Now which day will we not see your lovely attitude
around here.

Sunday Oct 14.

Judging the performers...
 

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:22:56 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:03:01 -0700, Tim wrote:

John H. wrote:
I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?

it's OK with me, thats also my birthday.

Hope all goes well with you, John. and hope the surgery and recovery
is smooth.
The doctor says no golf for *four* months! Crap!

Neck operation? What did you do to yourself?

Degenerative disc disease. This explains it all:

http://tinyurl.com/2vzzry




Arrrgh! Good luck.

Judging the performers...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:22:56 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:03:01 -0700, Tim wrote:

John H. wrote:
I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?

it's OK with me, thats also my birthday.

Hope all goes well with you, John. and hope the surgery and recovery
is smooth.

The doctor says no golf for *four* months! Crap!


Neck operation? What did you do to yourself?

Degenerative disc disease. This explains it all:

http://tinyurl.com/2vzzry



So, this is why you're such a pain in the neck. You're sharing.

Judging the performers...
 

John H. wrote:


Hope all goes well with you, John. and hope the surgery and recovery
is smooth.

The doctor says no golf for *four* months! Crap!

Good.

It'll give you time to redst up for spring.

Judging the performers...
 

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:22:56 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:03:01 -0700, Tim wrote:

John H. wrote:
I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?

it's OK with me, thats also my birthday.

Hope all goes well with you, John. and hope the surgery and recovery
is smooth.

The doctor says no golf for *four* months! Crap!


Neck operation? What did you do to yourself?

Degenerative disc disease. This explains it all:

http://tinyurl.com/2vzzry

My wife goes in for a total knee replacement the 29th fo this month.
the next few weeks afterwards will be "interesting" for me... to say
the least.

Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:24:22 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:13:27 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:r7esg3d21ae39kgia1hani1l0f427icser@4ax .com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4 ax.com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in
a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".


Except in your mind, I've not imbibed alcoholic beverages for almost 20
years now. So, I'm guessing you've made up your own definition.

And, that's OK! :)

Well, then there must be some other explanation for some of your childish
messages. See your doctor.


I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?

Doug, yesterday you got royally dumped on by just about everyone in the
group. Shouldn't you take a day or two off?

Judging the performers...
 

"Tim" wrote in message
ups.com...

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:22:56 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:03:01 -0700, Tim wrote:

John H. wrote:
I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?

it's OK with me, thats also my birthday.

Hope all goes well with you, John. and hope the surgery and recovery
is smooth.

The doctor says no golf for *four* months! Crap!


Neck operation? What did you do to yourself?

Degenerative disc disease. This explains it all:

http://tinyurl.com/2vzzry

My wife goes in for a total knee replacement the 29th fo this month.
the next few weeks afterwards will be "interesting" for me... to say
the least.


Uh oh. Can you cook?

Judging the performers...
 

On Oct 11, 12:47 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...





On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:22:56 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:03:01 -0700, Tim wrote:

John H. wrote:
I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?

it's OK with me, thats also my birthday.

Hope all goes well with you, John. and hope the surgery and recovery
is smooth.

The doctor says no golf for *four* months! Crap!

Neck operation? What did you do to yourself?

Degenerative disc disease. This explains it all:

http://tinyurl.com/2vzzry

So, this is why you're such a pain in the neck. You're sharing.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Does he have hemmroids, too?!

Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:03:01 -0700, Tim wrote:


John H. wrote:

I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?


it's OK with me, thats also my birthday.

Hope all goes well with you, John. and hope the surgery and recovery
is smooth.

The doctor says no golf for *four* months! Crap!