| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#17
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 13:46:38 -0400, Rick Kulesh penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: The single offers less hydrodynamic drag than the 2 do, and the 250 is probably about equal to the 2x150s. If you want twins purely for the "reliability" argumant, just get the big single and get a contract with BoatUS/SeaTow/(insert water-assistance company of choice in your area). You'll save a buncha dough and not really sacrifice anything. I don't include BoatUS/SeaTow as part of my planned safety equipment. They are a fall back position for things I can't plan for or take steps to avoid. Redundancies a 2 bilge pumps, 2 VHF radios, 2 engines.... that is planning for the eventual inevitability... You and I are on the same page on that one. 2 engines, 2 batteries, jumper cables, battery booster, 2 keys, 2 radios. 2 GPS's...on and on... My question to the fellow I had to tow home a few weeks ago... Do you have a spare batt? "NO" Do you have a battery booster? "NO" Do you have a paddle? "NO" "Im thinking of getting out of the boating business..." He said, with a grin, throwing me his tow line. db |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Single engine vs. twin engine | Cruising | |||
| Twin Keels are best!!! | ASA | |||
| Twin Keels are best!!! | ASA | |||
| Twin Keels are best!!! | ASA | |||
| Twin Keels again | Cruising | |||