Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been thinking about this and haven't really come to any
conclusion, But While in S. Florida this summer I was looking at the fishing boats. and of course you had your diesel or large gas powered Bluewater battlewagons, as Chuck would mention, they 40 footers with three tier tuna towers etc. But then you had the smaller center console sport fisherman craft, like the 22' - 27' Makos, Gradys, Parkers, etc Thhat were all equipped with large outboard single or dual. I was wondering why, especially in the smaller craft there was the absense of I/O's Like Mercruiser, volvo penta, etc. Anyone I've talked to has never given me a direct conclusive answer. Does it have to do with the salt water? handling charistics? etc? I don't know why the I/O's arn't popular for intermediate sport fishing. Thats why I'm asking. THANKS! |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim" wrote in message ups.com... I've been thinking about this and haven't really come to any conclusion, But While in S. Florida this summer I was looking at the fishing boats. and of course you had your diesel or large gas powered Bluewater battlewagons, as Chuck would mention, they 40 footers with three tier tuna towers etc. But then you had the smaller center console sport fisherman craft, like the 22' - 27' Makos, Gradys, Parkers, etc Thhat were all equipped with large outboard single or dual. I was wondering why, especially in the smaller craft there was the absense of I/O's Like Mercruiser, volvo penta, etc. Anyone I've talked to has never given me a direct conclusive answer. Does it have to do with the salt water? handling charistics? etc? I don't know why the I/O's arn't popular for intermediate sport fishing. Thats why I'm asking. THANKS! All those intermediate sport fishing boats with big outboards are owned by people that used to have an I/O. That's why. Eisboch |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim wrote:
I've been thinking about this and haven't really come to any conclusion, But While in S. Florida this summer I was looking at the fishing boats. and of course you had your diesel or large gas powered Bluewater battlewagons, as Chuck would mention, they 40 footers with three tier tuna towers etc. But then you had the smaller center console sport fisherman craft, like the 22' - 27' Makos, Gradys, Parkers, etc Thhat were all equipped with large outboard single or dual. I was wondering why, especially in the smaller craft there was the absense of I/O's Like Mercruiser, volvo penta, etc. Anyone I've talked to has never given me a direct conclusive answer. Does it have to do with the salt water? handling charistics? etc? I don't know why the I/O's arn't popular for intermediate sport fishing. Thats why I'm asking. THANKS! Because: Their drive system is more complicated (more turns) than an outboard, Their boots can leak offshore, causing the boat to sink, Their lower units cannot be raised completely out of the water when the boat is not being used, leading to interesting corrosion, galvanic action, and marine growth problems, Their engines tend to take up lots of fishing space in the stern of the boat, Their engines are heavier, putting more weight in the stern, Their exhaust systems and manifolds tend to rust out in five years or less. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a previous owner of a 200hp Evinrude on a bass boat all I can say is it
was the biggest pile of junk I have ever owned in my life. It put me out of the bass fishing craze. Wouldn't idle and blew ever 25 hours. It wasn't long after that time that Evinrude went under. In two summers it had 3 power heads put on at a cool 12k a piece, two under warranty and one after I unloaded it to a car dealership owner. Later, Brad "HK" wrote in message ... Tim wrote: I've been thinking about this and haven't really come to any conclusion, But While in S. Florida this summer I was looking at the fishing boats. and of course you had your diesel or large gas powered Bluewater battlewagons, as Chuck would mention, they 40 footers with three tier tuna towers etc. But then you had the smaller center console sport fisherman craft, like the 22' - 27' Makos, Gradys, Parkers, etc Thhat were all equipped with large outboard single or dual. I was wondering why, especially in the smaller craft there was the absense of I/O's Like Mercruiser, volvo penta, etc. Anyone I've talked to has never given me a direct conclusive answer. Does it have to do with the salt water? handling charistics? etc? I don't know why the I/O's arn't popular for intermediate sport fishing. Thats why I'm asking. THANKS! Because: Their drive system is more complicated (more turns) than an outboard, Their boots can leak offshore, causing the boat to sink, Their lower units cannot be raised completely out of the water when the boat is not being used, leading to interesting corrosion, galvanic action, and marine growth problems, Their engines tend to take up lots of fishing space in the stern of the boat, Their engines are heavier, putting more weight in the stern, Their exhaust systems and manifolds tend to rust out in five years or less. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:36:36 -0400, HK wrote: Tim wrote: I've been thinking about this and haven't really come to any conclusion, But While in S. Florida this summer I was looking at the fishing boats. and of course you had your diesel or large gas powered Bluewater battlewagons, as Chuck would mention, they 40 footers with three tier tuna towers etc. But then you had the smaller center console sport fisherman craft, like the 22' - 27' Makos, Gradys, Parkers, etc Thhat were all equipped with large outboard single or dual. I was wondering why, especially in the smaller craft there was the absense of I/O's Like Mercruiser, volvo penta, etc. Anyone I've talked to has never given me a direct conclusive answer. Does it have to do with the salt water? handling charistics? etc? I don't know why the I/O's arn't popular for intermediate sport fishing. Thats why I'm asking. THANKS! Because: Their drive system is more complicated (more turns) than an outboard, Their boots can leak offshore, causing the boat to sink, Their lower units cannot be raised completely out of the water when the boat is not being used, leading to interesting corrosion, galvanic action, and marine growth problems, Their engines tend to take up lots of fishing space in the stern of the boat, Their engines are heavier, putting more weight in the stern, Their exhaust systems and manifolds tend to rust out in five years or less. I'll add a couple mo Rubber couplers between the engine and outdrive that wear out and shred. (Usually means pulling the engine to replace) Hydraulic lines for tilt/trim that leak. Shift cables that get worn. "Flappers" that rot and seize. Can be susceptible to hydrolocking the engine if a large wave or wake hits the stern hard with the engine off ... especially after the "flappers" freeze up in the open position. Eisboch |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Eisboch" wrote in message
... On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:36:36 -0400, HK wrote: Tim wrote: I've been thinking about this and haven't really come to any conclusion, But While in S. Florida this summer I was looking at the fishing boats. and of course you had your diesel or large gas powered Bluewater battlewagons, as Chuck would mention, they 40 footers with three tier tuna towers etc. But then you had the smaller center console sport fisherman craft, like the 22' - 27' Makos, Gradys, Parkers, etc Thhat were all equipped with large outboard single or dual. I was wondering why, especially in the smaller craft there was the absense of I/O's Like Mercruiser, volvo penta, etc. Anyone I've talked to has never given me a direct conclusive answer. Does it have to do with the salt water? handling charistics? etc? I don't know why the I/O's arn't popular for intermediate sport fishing. Thats why I'm asking. THANKS! Because: Their drive system is more complicated (more turns) than an outboard, Their boots can leak offshore, causing the boat to sink, Their lower units cannot be raised completely out of the water when the boat is not being used, leading to interesting corrosion, galvanic action, and marine growth problems, Their engines tend to take up lots of fishing space in the stern of the boat, Their engines are heavier, putting more weight in the stern, Their exhaust systems and manifolds tend to rust out in five years or less. I'll add a couple mo Rubber couplers between the engine and outdrive that wear out and shred. (Usually means pulling the engine to replace) Hydraulic lines for tilt/trim that leak. Shift cables that get worn. "Flappers" that rot and seize. Can be susceptible to hydrolocking the engine if a large wave or wake hits the stern hard with the engine off ... especially after the "flappers" freeze up in the open position. Eisboch Having read all this, what is the advantage to an I/O engine, if any? |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message news ![]() "Eisboch" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:36:36 -0400, HK wrote: Tim wrote: I've been thinking about this and haven't really come to any conclusion, But While in S. Florida this summer I was looking at the fishing boats. and of course you had your diesel or large gas powered Bluewater battlewagons, as Chuck would mention, they 40 footers with three tier tuna towers etc. But then you had the smaller center console sport fisherman craft, like the 22' - 27' Makos, Gradys, Parkers, etc Thhat were all equipped with large outboard single or dual. I was wondering why, especially in the smaller craft there was the absense of I/O's Like Mercruiser, volvo penta, etc. Anyone I've talked to has never given me a direct conclusive answer. Does it have to do with the salt water? handling charistics? etc? I don't know why the I/O's arn't popular for intermediate sport fishing. Thats why I'm asking. THANKS! Because: Their drive system is more complicated (more turns) than an outboard, Their boots can leak offshore, causing the boat to sink, Their lower units cannot be raised completely out of the water when the boat is not being used, leading to interesting corrosion, galvanic action, and marine growth problems, Their engines tend to take up lots of fishing space in the stern of the boat, Their engines are heavier, putting more weight in the stern, Their exhaust systems and manifolds tend to rust out in five years or less. I'll add a couple mo Rubber couplers between the engine and outdrive that wear out and shred. (Usually means pulling the engine to replace) Hydraulic lines for tilt/trim that leak. Shift cables that get worn. "Flappers" that rot and seize. Can be susceptible to hydrolocking the engine if a large wave or wake hits the stern hard with the engine off ... especially after the "flappers" freeze up in the open position. Eisboch Having read all this, what is the advantage to an I/O engine, if any? Cheaper than comparable power outboards. Eisboch |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:36:36 -0400, HK wrote: Tim wrote: I've been thinking about this and haven't really come to any conclusion, But While in S. Florida this summer I was looking at the fishing boats. and of course you had your diesel or large gas powered Bluewater battlewagons, as Chuck would mention, they 40 footers with three tier tuna towers etc. But then you had the smaller center console sport fisherman craft, like the 22' - 27' Makos, Gradys, Parkers, etc Thhat were all equipped with large outboard single or dual. I was wondering why, especially in the smaller craft there was the absense of I/O's Like Mercruiser, volvo penta, etc. Anyone I've talked to has never given me a direct conclusive answer. Does it have to do with the salt water? handling charistics? etc? I don't know why the I/O's arn't popular for intermediate sport fishing. Thats why I'm asking. THANKS! Because: Their drive system is more complicated (more turns) than an outboard, Their boots can leak offshore, causing the boat to sink, Their lower units cannot be raised completely out of the water when the boat is not being used, leading to interesting corrosion, galvanic action, and marine growth problems, Their engines tend to take up lots of fishing space in the stern of the boat, Their engines are heavier, putting more weight in the stern, Their exhaust systems and manifolds tend to rust out in five years or less. I'll add a couple mo Rubber couplers between the engine and outdrive that wear out and shred. (Usually means pulling the engine to replace) Hydraulic lines for tilt/trim that leak. Shift cables that get worn. "Flappers" that rot and seize. Can be susceptible to hydrolocking the engine if a large wave or wake hits the stern hard with the engine off ... especially after the "flappers" freeze up in the open position. Eisboch Having read all this, what is the advantage to an I/O engine, if any? They look pretty and are bigger. Size does matter. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:19:15 -0700, Tim wrote:
I've been thinking about this and haven't really come to any conclusion, But While in S. Florida this summer I was looking at the fishing boats. and of course you had your diesel or large gas powered Bluewater battlewagons, as Chuck would mention, they 40 footers with three tier tuna towers etc. But then you had the smaller center console sport fisherman craft, like the 22' - 27' Makos, Gradys, Parkers, etc Thhat were all equipped with large outboard single or dual. I was wondering why, especially in the smaller craft there was the absense of I/O's Like Mercruiser, volvo penta, etc. Anyone I've talked to has never given me a direct conclusive answer. Does it have to do with the salt water? handling charistics? etc? I don't know why the I/O's arn't popular for intermediate sport fishing. Thats why I'm asking. THANKS! Tim, I had an I/O in my 21' Proline. I'll never have another I/O. They must be winterized and de-winterized. Changing the oil is a nightmare. In fact, almost any maintenance, other than checking the belt, is a nightmare. Replacing manifolds and risers is a pain, besides being costly. In the Ches Bay, they should be changed about every 7-8 years. I waited until the ninth year. Had to be towed in. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:31:25 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message oups.com... I've been thinking about this and haven't really come to any conclusion, But While in S. Florida this summer I was looking at the fishing boats. and of course you had your diesel or large gas powered Bluewater battlewagons, as Chuck would mention, they 40 footers with three tier tuna towers etc. But then you had the smaller center console sport fisherman craft, like the 22' - 27' Makos, Gradys, Parkers, etc Thhat were all equipped with large outboard single or dual. I was wondering why, especially in the smaller craft there was the absense of I/O's Like Mercruiser, volvo penta, etc. Anyone I've talked to has never given me a direct conclusive answer. Does it have to do with the salt water? handling charistics? etc? I don't know why the I/O's arn't popular for intermediate sport fishing. Thats why I'm asking. THANKS! All those intermediate sport fishing boats with big outboards are owned by people that used to have an I/O. That's why. Eisboch And I'll soon be one of those! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sailboat Popularity Question ... $4 per gal fuel | Cruising | |||
Outboard question. | General | |||
Bush's Popularity Reaches New Low | General | |||
Question about an outboard that won't run wet - Please help! | UK Power Boats | |||
Is Harry Potter's popularity a sign of the coming end of Christianity and rebirth of Paganism? | ASA |