Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um...

Whatever.

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html

"Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political
speech."

Subtle. Nuance.

On Oct 1, 7:41 am, Duke Nukem wrote:
Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um...

Whatever.

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html

"Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political
speech."

Subtle. Nuance.

Hey, only liberal spew is allowed here. Chucky is gonna' be ****ed...

On Oct 1, 7:35?am, wrote:
On Oct 1, 7:41 am, Duke Nukem wrote:

Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um...

Whatever.

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html

"Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political
speech."

Subtle. Nuance.

Hey, only liberal spew is allowed here. Chucky is gonna' be ****ed...


I just deleted my smart ass retort, leaving room here for you to post
an apology for your false and malicious characterization.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Oct 1, 12:19 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 1, 7:35?am, wrote:

On Oct 1, 7:41 am, Duke Nukem wrote:

Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um...

Whatever.

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html

"Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political
speech."

Subtle. Nuance.

Hey, only liberal spew is allowed here. Chucky is gonna' be ****ed...

I just deleted my smart ass retort, leaving room here for you to post
an apology for your false and malicious characterization.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-----------------------------------------------------------------

Fact is, last week you did not like what I said, so you outed me, the
nuclear option if you will in a news group. You have acted this way in
the past, no reason to think you won't do it again. Nothing more to
say about it.

On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:41:44 GMT, Duke Nukem wrote:

Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um...

Whatever.

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html

"Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political
speech."

Subtle. Nuance.

You shouldn't belittle moveon.org. Look how much it helped Kerry.

"John H." wrote in message
news
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:41:44 GMT, Duke Nukem wrote:

Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um...

Whatever.

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html

"Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political
speech."

Subtle. Nuance.

You shouldn't belittle moveon.org. Look how much it helped Kerry.

Take it to a.politics, hypocrite.

In article , jherring1
@yahoo.com says...
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:41:44 GMT, Duke Nukem wrote:

Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um...

Whatever.

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html

"Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political
speech."

Subtle. Nuance.

You shouldn't belittle moveon.org. Look how much it helped Kerry.

Didn't help him nearly as much as Swiftboaters did, eh?

Freakin' skanks.

In article om,
says...
On Oct 1, 7:41 am, Duke Nukem wrote:
Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um...

Whatever.

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html

"Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political
speech."

Subtle. Nuance.

Hey, only liberal spew is allowed here. Chucky is gonna' be ****ed...

Chuck reserves most of his netcoping for liberals. I don't suppose
you've noticed.

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article , jherring1
@yahoo.com says...
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:41:44 GMT, Duke Nukem wrote:

Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um...

Whatever.

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html

"Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political
speech."

Subtle. Nuance.

You shouldn't belittle moveon.org. Look how much it helped Kerry.

Didn't help him nearly as much as Swiftboaters did, eh?

Freakin' skanks.

All he had to do was sign his Form 180- then we'd all know the truth.

Probably could have sued the swift boaters for millions (if he wasn't lying)

On Oct 1, 9:30?am, wrote:
On Oct 1, 12:19 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:





On Oct 1, 7:35?am, wrote:

On Oct 1, 7:41 am, Duke Nukem wrote:

Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um...

Whatever.

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html

"Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political
speech."

Subtle. Nuance.

Hey, only liberal spew is allowed here. Chucky is gonna' be ****ed...

I just deleted my smart ass retort, leaving room here for you to post
an apology for your false and malicious characterization.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- -----------------------------------------------------------------

Fact is, last week you did not like what I said, so you outed me, the
nuclear option if you will in a news group. You have acted this way in
the past, no reason to think you won't do it again. Nothing more to
say about it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Odd. I don't seem to remember making any personal attack on you-
particularly of a "nuclear" caliber. Take another look, Scotty- it was
*another poster* who answered the question about your previous handles
in the NG. I merely stated that you had been posting here for years.

Your unprovoked personal attack in this thread is duly noted. While
you "think" that I "might" act a certain way in the future- you might
want to consider evaluating your own actions in the present.

I have commented unfavorably about political trolls from all sides.
Ask jps and Doug Kanter......and do try to pay some attention if
you're going to presume to be an authority on what I will or won't do.

Have a pleasant day.