Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
MoveOn suppressing free speech?
Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um...
Whatever. http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html "Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political speech." Subtle. Nuance. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
MoveOn suppressing free speech?
On Oct 1, 7:41 am, Duke Nukem wrote:
Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um... Whatever. http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html "Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political speech." Subtle. Nuance. Hey, only liberal spew is allowed here. Chucky is gonna' be ****ed... |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
MoveOn suppressing free speech?
On Oct 1, 7:35?am, wrote:
On Oct 1, 7:41 am, Duke Nukem wrote: Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um... Whatever. http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html "Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political speech." Subtle. Nuance. Hey, only liberal spew is allowed here. Chucky is gonna' be ****ed... I just deleted my smart ass retort, leaving room here for you to post an apology for your false and malicious characterization. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
MoveOn suppressing free speech?
On Oct 1, 12:19 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 1, 7:35?am, wrote: On Oct 1, 7:41 am, Duke Nukem wrote: Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um... Whatever. http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html "Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political speech." Subtle. Nuance. Hey, only liberal spew is allowed here. Chucky is gonna' be ****ed... I just deleted my smart ass retort, leaving room here for you to post an apology for your false and malicious characterization. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*----------------------------------------------------------------- Fact is, last week you did not like what I said, so you outed me, the nuclear option if you will in a news group. You have acted this way in the past, no reason to think you won't do it again. Nothing more to say about it. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
MoveOn suppressing free speech?
On Oct 1, 9:30?am, wrote:
On Oct 1, 12:19 pm, Chuck Gould wrote: On Oct 1, 7:35?am, wrote: On Oct 1, 7:41 am, Duke Nukem wrote: Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um... Whatever. http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html "Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political speech." Subtle. Nuance. Hey, only liberal spew is allowed here. Chucky is gonna' be ****ed... I just deleted my smart ass retort, leaving room here for you to post an apology for your false and malicious characterization. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Fact is, last week you did not like what I said, so you outed me, the nuclear option if you will in a news group. You have acted this way in the past, no reason to think you won't do it again. Nothing more to say about it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Odd. I don't seem to remember making any personal attack on you- particularly of a "nuclear" caliber. Take another look, Scotty- it was *another poster* who answered the question about your previous handles in the NG. I merely stated that you had been posting here for years. Your unprovoked personal attack in this thread is duly noted. While you "think" that I "might" act a certain way in the future- you might want to consider evaluating your own actions in the present. I have commented unfavorably about political trolls from all sides. Ask jps and Doug Kanter......and do try to pay some attention if you're going to presume to be an authority on what I will or won't do. Have a pleasant day. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
MoveOn suppressing free speech?
On Oct 1, 1:52 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 1, 9:30?am, wrote: On Oct 1, 12:19 pm, Chuck Gould wrote: On Oct 1, 7:35?am, wrote: On Oct 1, 7:41 am, Duke Nukem wrote: Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um... Whatever. http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html "Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political speech." Subtle. Nuance. Hey, only liberal spew is allowed here. Chucky is gonna' be ****ed... I just deleted my smart ass retort, leaving room here for you to post an apology for your false and malicious characterization. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Fact is, last week you did not like what I said, so you outed me, the nuclear option if you will in a news group. You have acted this way in the past, no reason to think you won't do it again. Nothing more to say about it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Odd. I don't seem to remember making any personal attack on you- particularly of a "nuclear" caliber. Take another look, Scotty- it was *another poster* who answered the question about your previous handles in the NG. I merely stated that you had been posting here for years. Your unprovoked personal attack in this thread is duly noted. While you "think" that I "might" act a certain way in the future- you might want to consider evaluating your own actions in the present. I have commented unfavorably about political trolls from all sides. Ask jps and Doug Kanter......and do try to pay some attention if you're going to presume to be an authority on what I will or won't do. Have a pleasant day.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You too... still think your unlimited hydro driver and sponsorship is cool, we'll get over it. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
MoveOn suppressing free speech?
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:52:52 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote: Odd. I don't seem to remember making any personal attack on you- particularly of a "nuclear" caliber. Take another look, Scotty- it was *another poster* who answered the question about your previous handles in the NG. I merely stated that you had been posting here for years. Chuck is correct. I am the one who highlighted some of your previous posts but I don't regard that as "outing" some one. Everything we post on Usenet is preserved for history somewhere. Google knows all and tells all. That said, most of us who have been around for awhile recognize writing styles, ISPs, geographic references and other little factoids that make it difficult to hide behind a new handle. How many conservative leaning boat builders, on the Connecticut River, and active on the internet do you think there are? Just another good reasons to take political posts somewhere else... |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
MoveOn suppressing free speech?
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:41:44 GMT, Duke Nukem wrote:
Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um... Whatever. http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html "Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political speech." Subtle. Nuance. You shouldn't belittle moveon.org. Look how much it helped Kerry. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
MoveOn suppressing free speech?
"John H." wrote in message
news On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:41:44 GMT, Duke Nukem wrote: Say it ain't so!! I thought they were all about - um... Whatever. http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...orgs-thin.html "Beyond that, it's amazing that MoveOn would try to squelch political speech." Subtle. Nuance. You shouldn't belittle moveon.org. Look how much it helped Kerry. Take it to a.politics, hypocrite. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
( OT ) Free Speech Impediment | General |