![]() |
Well, I've made up my mind...
On Sep 26, 8:25 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: Because I can and I'm tired of fishing inshore. If that be the case, then Tom, you need a Russian Meteor! http://en.wikivisual.com/images/8/84...rHydrofoil.jpg Very fast, very furious, and very BIG! 1000 hp v-12 turbo diesel, and all the room you need for that fishing gear! One sold on ebay last year for (I think) about $50,000.00 USD |
Well, I've made up my mind...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
http://www.contender.com/boats.aspx?id=494 Pobbisly with F350s - I want to test drive a few first before I make up my mind on power. Damn, I thought you were moving to SC, inland and were looking for a Pontoon Boat. It is a wild ride to go from a pontoon boat to a Canyon Battleship. When I saw you were thinking about twin F350's I thought it might be overkill, until I saw the boat. |
Well, I've made up my mind...
On Sep 26, 5:28?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: http://www.contender.com/boats.aspx?id=494 Pobbisly with F350s - I want to test drive a few first before I make up my mind on power. If you would consider "settling" for a 36 footer instead of the 38, this might be a good buy. Only 200 hours on this 2 year old boat. Under $250k. Not all that far from you, either. http://yachtworld.com/core/listing/b...id=4184&url = |
Well, I've made up my mind...
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:12:11 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: When I saw you were thinking about twin F350's I thought it might be overkill, until I saw the boat. I'd go for the triples 350s if you really want outboards. It should still run on plane with 2, problematic with one. You can always tilt up the middle and run on twins for "economy" mode, such as it is. Personally I'd prefer twin inboard diesels on a boat that size. |
Well, I've made up my mind...
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:12:11 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: When I saw you were thinking about twin F350's I thought it might be overkill, until I saw the boat. I'd go for the triples 350s if you really want outboards. It should still run on plane with 2, problematic with one. You can always tilt up the middle and run on twins for "economy" mode, such as it is. Personally I'd prefer twin inboard diesels on a boat that size. I agree. It's funny that for a guy who drives and appreciates a diesel powered truck, SWF seems to have an aversion to diesel powered boats. It's not all about speed offshore as the boats get bigger, although with the right turbo diesels, he'd have plenty of it. Diesel inboards would be better for close quarter handling, fuel economy and, (arguably) reliability for long runs. Eisboch |
Well, I've made up my mind...
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:56:49 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
It's not all about speed offshore as the boats get bigger, although with the right turbo diesels, he'd have plenty of it. It's been my experience that when conditions get rough, we all run at the same speed. The only difference is that I don't have to slow down. :-) |
Well, I've made up my mind...
Eisboch wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:12:11 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: When I saw you were thinking about twin F350's I thought it might be overkill, until I saw the boat. I'd go for the triples 350s if you really want outboards. It should still run on plane with 2, problematic with one. You can always tilt up the middle and run on twins for "economy" mode, such as it is. Personally I'd prefer twin inboard diesels on a boat that size. I agree. It's funny that for a guy who drives and appreciates a diesel powered truck, SWF seems to have an aversion to diesel powered boats. It's not all about speed offshore as the boats get bigger, although with the right turbo diesels, he'd have plenty of it. Diesel inboards would be better for close quarter handling, fuel economy and, (arguably) reliability for long runs. Eisboch But the Yamahas give him a chance to buy into solid, four cycle outboard technology! |
Well, I've made up my mind...
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:19:29 -0400, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:12:11 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: When I saw you were thinking about twin F350's I thought it might be overkill, until I saw the boat. I'd go for the triples 350s if you really want outboards. It should still run on plane with 2, problematic with one. You can always tilt up the middle and run on twins for "economy" mode, such as it is. Personally I'd prefer twin inboard diesels on a boat that size. I agree. It's funny that for a guy who drives and appreciates a diesel powered truck, SWF seems to have an aversion to diesel powered boats. It's not all about speed offshore as the boats get bigger, although with the right turbo diesels, he'd have plenty of it. Diesel inboards would be better for close quarter handling, fuel economy and, (arguably) reliability for long runs. Eisboch But the Yamahas give him a chance to buy into solid, four cycle outboard technology! I've had lots of 'boat ho's' in the bay contribute $20 for gas. I don't know if I could ask them to chip in $220! You should be well pleased with the fuel burn on your new Yamaha. |
Well, I've made up my mind...
On Sep 27, 2:56 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:12:11 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: When I saw you were thinking about twin F350's I thought it might be overkill, until I saw the boat. I'd go for the triples 350s if you really want outboards. It should still run on plane with 2, problematic with one. You can always tilt up the middle and run on twins for "economy" mode, such as it is. Personally I'd prefer twin inboard diesels on a boat that size. I agree. It's funny that for a guy who drives and appreciates a diesel powered truck, Not anymore;) SWF seems to have an aversion to diesel powered boats. It's not all about speed offshore as the boats get bigger, although with the right turbo diesels, he'd have plenty of it. Diesel inboards would be better for close quarter handling, fuel economy and, (arguably) reliability for long runs. Eisboch |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com