Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,635
Default BoatUS- The dangers of low transom boats

Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:57:54 -0400, HK wrote:

Once again, I find it sad that usenet allows "anonymous" posters.


A little strong for someone who edits out the HIN on their boat photos
don't you think?



I don't post here anonymously. My email is real, and so is my IP.
If I published a photo of my autos, I'd blank out the license plate.

BTW, I thought it funny that you actually believed all the rocks around
the Thimbles were marked on charts. They aren't. I would be delighted to
point you and your floating RV to several areas along the Connecticut
shoreline in the Sound where there are rocks not marked on the charts.
There are several, for example, right here in an area I know very, very
well:

http://tinyurl.com/2r4joa


A couple of the larger ones are marked. Several of the smaller ones that
are subrosa are not marked at all and in fact are not visible in this
aerial shot.


  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,557
Default BoatUS- The dangers of low transom boats

HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:57:54 -0400, HK wrote:

Once again, I find it sad that usenet allows "anonymous" posters.


A little strong for someone who edits out the HIN on their boat photos
don't you think?



I don't post here anonymously. My email is real, and so is my IP.
If I published a photo of my autos, I'd blank out the license plate.

BTW, I thought it funny that you actually believed all the rocks around
the Thimbles were marked on charts. They aren't. I would be delighted to
point you and your floating RV to several areas along the Connecticut
shoreline in the Sound where there are rocks not marked on the charts.
There are several, for example, right here in an area I know very, very
well:

http://tinyurl.com/2r4joa


A couple of the larger ones are marked. Several of the smaller ones that
are subrosa are not marked at all and in fact are not visible in this
aerial shot.


Harry Krause,
To forge an IP is against my ISP, and most ISP TOS. If you think anyone
has forged their ISP, you should report them and they will lose their
access to their internet. If you really want to get rid of me, and you
think I have ever forged my IP, send that post to .
They will cut my service off immediately.

If you remember, when you used a sock puppet to talk about your lobster
boat, that is the way someone realized it you were actually caring on an
NG conversation with yourself. You both had the exact same IP, the same
one you had had for years.

  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Dan Dan is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 355
Default BoatUS- The dangers of low transom boats

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:



Harry Krause,
To forge an IP is against my ISP, and most ISP TOS. If you think anyone
has forged their ISP, you should report them and they will lose their
access to their internet. If you really want to get rid of me, and you
think I have ever forged my IP, send that post to .
They will cut my service off immediately.

If you remember, when you used a sock puppet to talk about your lobster
boat, that is the way someone realized it you were actually caring on an
NG conversation with yourself. You both had the exact same IP, the same
one you had had for years.


crickets
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,536
Default BoatUS- The dangers of low transom boats

On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:32:04 -0400, HK wrote:

BTW, I thought it funny that you actually believed all the rocks around
the Thimbles were marked on charts.


So far we've had the good fortune not to hit any of them.

They aren't. I would be delighted to
point you and your floating RV to several areas along the Connecticut
shoreline in the Sound where there are rocks not marked on the charts.
There are several, for example, right here in an area I know very, very
well:

http://tinyurl.com/2r4joa


A couple of the larger ones are marked. Several of the smaller ones that
are subrosa are not marked at all and in fact are not visible in this
aerial shot.


What town?

We would not usually not push our luck that close to the Connecticut
shore except in a well marked channel. Prop repairs on a big boat get
to be fairly expensive and can take you out of service until you find
a diver with the right tools.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
further to the avoidable dangers post Hoges in WA Cruising 2 December 21st 05 04:24 AM
OnTopic:BoatUS Insurance Issue akheel General 15 November 3rd 04 11:25 AM
More on ICW Dangers anchorlt Cruising 6 March 13th 04 04:00 PM
West Marine/BoatUS-Happy Story Bobsprit ASA 2 November 22nd 03 03:09 PM
BoatUS/WestMarine Happy Story Bobsprit Cruising 0 November 22nd 03 02:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017