Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Vic Smith wrote: --Vic Vic, Harry knows everything about boating, so our comments are not directed towards him. If you have been around long enough, you will see he spends every weekend and weekday logged onto rec.boats. When he goes to sell this boat in a few years, you will see it has very very few hours on the engine meter. But if you also noticed, those regulars who actually use their boats and boat in salt water, no of them, would have picked a boat with an open transom. So this discussion of open transom vs. brackets or engine well is really designed for those people who don't know everything yet, but might be interested in buying a CC to actually use. I find any discussion that actually involves a boating topic to be far superior to one that involves cut and pasting a political argument into a boating NG, just so one can call other assholes. So in that respect, I would have to say the NG is the winner, and there are no losers. Vic, As someone who doesn't know everything there is to know about all subjects, I do learn something new just about everyday. David Pasco, a professional marine surveyor and author (http://www.yachtsurvey.com/surveyorrelated.htm) had this this to say about open transom boats: Open Transoms or boats with no transoms have been appearing on the market with more frequency lately, and many of these are just accidents waiting to happen. A boat without a transom cannot reasonably be called seaworthy unless the internal compartments of the hull are made absolutely watertight. This is almost never the case because the builders never put absolutely watertight hatches in the decks. They make a mistake by ignoring the probability that at some point in time the vessel will encounter circumstances where waves are crashing over the nonexistent transom, flooding the deck, and thereby endangering the vessel and its passengers. Builders of such boats don't have the foresight (which they should have) to consider what would happen if such a boat lost power while navigating a dangerous inlet, or breaks down while at sea. Under these circumstances, the lack of a transom becomes very dangerous. Even large sport fishermen with large, open cockpit scuppers or non-sealing transom doors have gotten into trouble under such conditions. If you are the owner of such a boat, you had better think carefully how you use it. I have no doubt Harry will not have any problem using his boat on perfect days in the Chesapeake Bay, so it is the perfect boat for his application, but if I was buying a boat to go offshore in less than perfect conditions. When I used to hear all of the Bayliner Bashers I said that they were a great boat for inland lakes, bays and close to shore use, but to compare them to a true offshore battlewagon (as Skipper used to do) was silly. I think before anyone purchased an open transom boat, they should review how they plan on actually using the boat. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Safe boating is no accident | ASA | |||
free safe boating class BELGRADE ,MAINE | General | |||
Boating is Dangerous, & that's no Croc! | General | |||
Boating is Dangerous, & that's no Croc! | General | |||
Safe Boating Reminders from the USCG | General |